Journal of Prosthodontic Research
Online ISSN : 1883-9207
Print ISSN : 1883-1958
ISSN-L : 1883-1958
Original articles
Influence of different flask systems on tooth displacement and framework misfit in mandibular fixed implant-supported complete dentures
Conrado Reinoldes CaetanoRafael Leonardo Xediek ConsaniAtaís BacchiAmérico Bortolazzo CorrerMateus Bertolini Fernandes dos Santos
Author information
JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS

2013 Volume 57 Issue 3 Pages 213-218

Details
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the influence of different metallic flask systems for acrylic resin denture processing on tooth displacement and framework misfit of mandibular fixed implant-supported complete dentures.
Methods: Standard mandibular implant-supported complete dentures in five implants were waxed and randomly assigned to three groups: G1 – conventional flask, G2 – double flask, and G3 – occlusion flask. Framework misfit in all the implants and the linear distances between teeth (I-I – incisor-to-incisor; P-P – premolar-to-premolar; M-M – molar-to-molar; RI-RM – right-incisor-to-right-molar; and LI-LM – left-incisor-to-left-molar) were measured before and after denture processing using an optical microscope. Dentures were processed by hot water curing cycle (9 h/74 °C). Collected data were analyzed by paired Student's t-test and one-way ANOVA (α = 0.05).
Results: All the measured distances presented changes in tooth displacement after denture processing. However, the M-M distance for G1 (p = 0.003) and the P-P (p = 0.042) and LI-LM (p = 0.044) distances for G3 showed statistically significant differences. Differences between the flask systems were not statistically significant. Statistically significant differences in the framework misfit due to denture processing were found for all the implants and groups, with the exception of right median implant for G2 and right distal implant for G3. A comparison of the flask systems found statistically significant differences in which G1 presented an increase in the misfit values and G2 and G3 a decrease.
Conclusions: Different flask systems did not cause significant changes in tooth displacement. Frameworks misfit values were influenced by the different flask systems. The conventional flask presented an increase in the framework misfit, while the experimental flasks showed a decrease.
Content from these authors

This article cannot obtain the latest cited-by information.

© 2013 Japan Prosthodontic Society

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY 4.0), which allows users to distribute and copy the material in any format so long as attribution is given to the Japan Prosthodontic Society.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top