Journal of Prosthodontic Research
Online ISSN : 1883-9207
Print ISSN : 1883-1958
ISSN-L : 1883-1958
Original Articles
Biomechanical behavior of adhesive cement layer and periodontal tissues on the restored teeth with zirconia RBFDPs using three-kinds of framework design: 3D FEA study
Ayana UrabaReina NemotoKosuke NozakiTasuku InagakiSatoshi OmoriHiroyuki Miura
Author information
JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS

2018 Volume 62 Issue 2 Pages 227-233

Details
Abstract

Purpose: To investigate stress and strain concentrations on resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs) frameworks of different design using finite element analysis.

Methods: A human dry skull was scanned and models were produced using three-dimensional printer. After abutment preparation, three frameworks, including a three-unit RBFDP, and two-unit cantilevered RBFDPs using #21 and #23 for the abutment tooth, were fabricated. Scanned data were subtracted to define boundary of each structure. Occlusal force (200 N) was loaded at 45° to long axis of the pontic. The distributions of shear stress and principal strain in the RBFDP models were measured to evaluate the risk for framework-debonding from the abutment teeth and the impact on periodontal tissue.

Results: The percentage voxels with shear stress >11 MPa in adhesive cement layer of three-unit RBFDP using #21 and #23 were 4.16% and 2.25%, respectively; in two-unit cantilevered RBFDPs, it was 19.25% using #21, and 23.4% using #23. The maximum principal strain on periodontal ligaments in two-unit cantilevered RBFDPs using #21 was the largest, and smallest in the three-unit RBFDP. The maximum principal strain in framework was largest in the two-unit cantilevered RBFDP using #23, and smallest in the three-unit RBFDP.

Conclusions: The risk for framework-debonding in three-unit RBFDPs was substantially lower than that in two-unit RBFDPs. In difficult cases with indication for three-unit RBFDPs, two-unit cantilever design using the canine would be more advantageous for preservation of periodontal tissue, while for risk of framework-debonding, the design using the central incisor would be more advantageous.

Content from these authors

This article cannot obtain the latest cited-by information.

© 2018 Japan Prosthodontic Society

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY 4.0), which allows users to distribute and copy the material in any format so long as attribution is given to the Japan Prosthodontic Society.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top