Journal of Prosthodontic Research
Online ISSN : 1883-9207
Print ISSN : 1883-1958
ISSN-L : 1883-1958
Original Articles
Reproducibility of intraoral photography for pink and white tissue assessment — Is it worth the hassle?
Kristina BertlMichael H. BertlKlaus GotfredsenPatrick HeimelStefan LettnerWolfgang BertlAndreas Stavropoulos
Author information
JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS

2019 Volume 63 Issue 4 Pages 404-410

Details
Abstract

Purpose: To assess the effect of the shooting angle variation on linear and planimetric measurements of the pink and white tissues on intraoral photographs.

Methods: From intraoral three-dimensional (3D) scans of the anterior region in 10 patients, ninety-nine two-dimensional (2D) "scan pictures" each were generated with different shooting angles, each varying in 5° horizontal and vertical increments. Eleven intraoral photographs of each patient and tooth site were taken free-hand: one shot at baseline and 5 shots after 3 and 6 months at slightly varying shooting angles. Papilla height (PH) and area (PA) and tooth crown area (TCA) were estimated on all photographs; the "best-match-to-baseline" photograph from those taken at 3 and 6 months was chosen by 6 evaluators.

Results: Within the first 10° of deviation from the baseline shooting angle, measurements on the 2D "scan pictures" distorted ≤0.5 mm for PH and ≥10% for PA and TCA. Compared to baseline, only 6 out of 100 photographs presented ≥0.5 mm difference in PH, none of the TCA measurements showed distortion ≥10%, and only in 4 instances a ≥10% distortion of the PA was observed. Poor to moderate inter- and intra-rater agreement in choosing the "best-match-to-baseline" photograph was found, but photographs with clinically relevant changes were only seldomly chosen.

Conclusions: Deviations in the shooting angle ≤10° from the baseline shot cause clinically negligible distortions in linear and planimetric measurements. Highly comparable intraoral photographs of the anterior maxillary teeth can be captured "free-hand" in slightly varying perspective, and then selecting the "best-match-to-baseline".

Content from these authors

This article cannot obtain the latest cited-by information.

© 2019 Japan Prosthodontic Society

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY 4.0), which allows users to distribute and copy the material in any format so long as attribution is given to the Japan Prosthodontic Society.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top