2024 Volume 68 Issue 4 Pages 615-623
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate whether the presence of a mesial cantilever influences the biomechanical behavior and screw loosening in fixed partial dentures (FPDs) with a distally tilted implant in the atrophic posterior maxilla and where to best place the distal implant.
Methods: Two configurations of implant-supported four-unit FPDs were modelled using finite element analysis. Five interabutment distances were considered. The stress and strain distributions in the implants, abutments, and prosthetic screws were verified under occlusal loading. The development of the axial force on the abutments and screws was also examined. Two-sample t-tests were used to identify differences (P < 0.05).
Results: The von Mises stress distributions of the components in the two configurations were similar, as were the maximum plastic strains of the distal prosthetic screws, distal implants, and 30° abutments. The difference in the maximum plastic strains of the straight abutments was statistically significant. The preload of the 30° abutment screws was significantly reduced after the initial loading. In the absence of a mesial cantilever, the axial force on the straight abutments increased. However, when a mesial cantilever was used, the preload of the straight abutments was maintained, and the axial force on the prosthetic screws fluctuated less. The axial force fluctuation of the abutments gradually decreased as the interabutment distance increased.
Conclusions: Mesial cantilever usage had minimal effect on stress or strain distribution in FPD implants, abutments, or prostheses. However, it helped resist screw loosening. The distal screw access hole was preferably positioned close to the prosthetic end.
