Abstract
Purpose: In the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), there is not yet a convenient tool for deciding whether a mandibular advancement oral appliance (OA) is adequately adjusted or when to perform post-treatment sleep-testing. We hypothesized that a gradual reduction in the STOP (snoring, tiredness during daytime, observed apnea, high blood pressure) score, i.e., fewer Yes responses in the STOP questionnaire, in patients undergoing OA treatment could be an indicator of better OA adjustment and, thus, the best timing for follow-up polysomnography.
Methods: The STOP score was recorded at every patient visit when the OA was adjusted ventrally as necessary (i.e., STOP group). We considered that the appropriate timing for follow-up polysomnography was when the STOP score stopped decreasing. A historical control group was established from consecutive patients without a STOP score.
Results: In the STOP group (n=57), the median (interquartile range) of STOP scores gradually decreased with OA treatment, from 3 (2-3) to 0 (0-1) (p<0.05). While the apnea hypopnea index (AHI) was improved in both the STOP group (19±10 to 5±4 /hr, p<0.01) and the control group (n=61; 19±7 to 8±7 /hr, p<0.01), there was a significant difference in follow-up AHI between the two groups (p<0.05) after controlling for gender (male), age, body mass index, and baseline AHI: a superior treatment outcome in the STOP group.
Conclusions: The appropriate timing for follow-up sleep-testing in OSA patients undergoing OA therapy is when the STOP score stopped decreasing. This evaluation using the STOP score partly resolves the current “trial-and-error nature” of OA adjustment and facilitates proper post-treatment sleep-testing.
