Journal of Prosthodontic Research
Online ISSN : 1883-9207
Print ISSN : 1883-1958
ISSN-L : 1883-1958

This article has now been updated. Please use the final version.

Patient satisfaction with conventional dentures vs. digital dentures fabricated using 3D-printing: A randomized crossover trial
Katsura OharaYukari Isshiki Noriyuki HoshiAkinori OhnoNorishige KawanishiShintaro NagashimaMakoto InoueDaijiro KuboKatsuhiko YamayaErika InoueKatsuhiko Kimoto
Author information
JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS Advance online publication

Article ID: JPR_D_21_00048

Details
Abstract

Purpose: Evidence regarding the performance of digital dentures (DDs) fabricated using 3D printing is insufficient. This study aimed to evaluate patient satisfaction with conventional dentures (CDs) and DDs fabricated using 3D printing.

Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted between November 2017 and May 2020. In the CD-DD group, CDs were fabricated before DDs, while the protocol was reversed in the DD-CD group. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction, quantified using a 100-mm visual analog scale, which assessed chewing efficiency, pain, stability, retention, comfort, esthetics, ease of cleaning, phonetics, and general satisfaction. Secondary outcomes were quality of life (QOL), number of visits, time required for definitive denture fabrication, number of adjustment appointments, and time required for denture stabilization after denture delivery.

Results: Patient satisfaction with CDs was superior in terms of phonetics, ease of cleaning, stability, comfort, and general satisfaction. Secondary outcomes such as social disability and the number of clinic visits were significantly lower in patients with DDs. However, the two groups showed no significant differences in the other outcomes. Although patient satisfaction with DDs was inferior to that with CDs, 20% of patients preferred and used DDs (12 patients preferred CDs, and three patients opted for DDs).

Conclusion: Although patient satisfaction or QOL with DDs may be somewhat inferior to that with CDs, 20% of patients preferred and used DDs daily. Thus, DDs fabricated using 3D printing may have comparable practicality and efficacy to CDs.

Content from these authors
© 2022 Japan Prosthodontic Society

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BYNC 4.0), which allows users to distribute and copy the material in any format as long as credit is given to the Japan Prosthodontic Society. It should be noted however, that the material cannot be used for commercial purposes.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
feedback
Top