Article ID: JPR_D_24_00283
Purpose: This review critically examined the impact of various whitening toothpaste formulations on color stability, surface roughness, gloss, and microhardness of dental restorative materials.
Study selection: A comprehensive literature search yielded 101 articles from PubMed, 159 from Embase, and 617 from SCOPUS, spanning 1983–2024, of which 33 met the inclusion criteria.
Results: Studies have shown that whitening toothpastes influence color change and surface characteristics. Hydrogen peroxide (HP) formulations are generally effective in achieving color alteration, although their impact on microhardness and roughness varies. Charcoal-based toothpastes tend to increase surface roughness because of their abrasive nature, whereas blue covarine toothpaste provide some brightening effects but are also associated with higher roughness. Results regarding nanohybrid and microhybrid composites were mixed; some studies found nanohybrids to be superior in color stability, whereas others favored microhybrids. However, nanohybrids are more susceptible to roughness changes due to whitening agents, whereas nanofilled composites consistently demonstrate better surface integrity under abrasive conditions.
Conclusions: These findings highlight the importance of selecting toothpaste formulations that align with restorative material properties to optimize esthetic results without compromising durability. Although HP formulations show promise in balancing whitening efficacy with surface preservation, their long-term effects require further study. Additionally, continued research is needed to refine the formulations, particularly for charcoal and blue covarine, to reduce abrasiveness and extend restoration longevity.
