Journal of the Philosophy of Sport and Physical Education
Online ISSN : 1884-4553
Print ISSN : 0915-5104
ISSN-L : 0915-5104
Sovereignty and paternalism in sports through the case of a professional boxer, Jouichirou Tatsuyoshi
Yoshitaka KONDO
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

1998 Volume 20 Issue 1 Pages 15-30

Details
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to clarify the issue of an individual's sovereignty over his own body and person in the field of professional boxing.
This study is based on the debate between the well-known principles of individual sovereignty as presented by John Stuart Mill and the paternalistic regulations issued by the Japanese Boxing Commission (JBC).
The results here are as follows:
1. In a free society which emphasizes individual autonomy, a professional boxer such as J. Tatsuyoshi has sovereignty over his own body, the reason being that strong paternalism cannot be justified in the case of adult athletes.
2. In order to promote sound professional boxing, JBC should provide safe athletic settings and examine the medical condition of all boxers by means of medical examinations and empirical studies.
3. A balance of sovereignty and paternalism in sports should be achieved in an open system for all athletes. Moreover, unfair regulations should be replaced with fair ones.
Content from these authors
© Japan Society for the Philosophy of Sport and Physical Education
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top