Journal of Reproduction and Development
Online ISSN : 1348-4400
Print ISSN : 0916-8818
ISSN-L : 0916-8818
Original Articles
Influence of Nutrition on Seasonal Variations in Testicular Morphology and Function in Corriedale Rams
Alejandro BIELLITeresa GASTELRaquel PÉREZAlvaro LÓPEZAlejandro CASTRILLEJOMariel REGUEIROMats FORSBERGNils LUNDEHEIMHeriberto RODRIGUEZ-MARTINEZ
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

1997 Volume 43 Issue 2 Pages 171-180

Details
Abstract
To test the hypothesis that seasonal variations in testicular morphology and function differ in Corriedale rams subject to different feeding levels, 24 spring-born Corriedale rams, aged 14-15 months at the beginning of the trial and raised under extensive grazing conditions in Uruguay, were allotted at random to two groups: Group H, that grazed on improved (sown) pastures, and Group L, the control, that grazed on natural pastures (range). Clinical data (live weight, scrotal circumference), semen, blood and tissue samples (testis, epididymis and seminal vesicle) were collected during each of four seasons (for one month/season) of the year. According to data measured, testicular form and function had its peak in autumn followed by a decline in winter and a subsequent recovery in spring and summer. Live weight loss during winter was significantly decreased in Group L but not in Group H. Scrotal circumference, seminiferous tubules diameter and seminal vesicle epithelial height decreased significantly during winter in both groups. Group H scrotal circumference returned earlier (spring) than Group L (summer) to autumn values. By summer, seminiferous tubules and seminal vesicle epithelial height had returned to autumn values in Group H, but not in Group L. Decrements of scrotal circumference in winter and spring were milder in Group H than in Group L animals. Group H testosterone values in autumn were higher than those from Group L in spring. In summary: 1) differences existed in seasonal variations in testicular morphology and function between Corriedale rams subjected to different feeding levels and, 2) the findings suggest that nutritional factors contributed, at least partly, to the differences in variations observed throughout the experiment.
Content from these authors
© 1997 Society for Reproduction and Development

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons [Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International] license.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top