Abstract
Applicability of ovulation synchronization protocol using GnRH and PGF2α (PGF) injection to anestrous beef cows remains controversial. We compared the effectiveness of the protocol in the anestrous stage of the beef cow with that in the cycling stage using the same animals. Ovaries of five Japanese Black and three Japanese Shorthorn cows were ultrasonographically examined, and blood samples were collected daily for hormonal analyses. Each animal received the protocol twice (Day -6 to -8: GnRH, Day 0: PGF, Day 2: GnRH). Additional blood samples were taken before and after GnRH injection for LH and FSH measurements to evaluate the pituitary function. For the ovarian status at the onset of the protocol cows were divided into anestrous (n=8) and cycling (n=8) stages. There was no significant difference in size of the dominant follicle at the first and second GnRH injections, and in the magnitude of the pituitary response to GnRH between the two stages. However, the size of the corpus luteum and progesterone concentrations at the PGF injection in the anestrous stage were significantly smaller and lower (P<0.01), respectively, and ovulation synchronization rate in the anestrous stage was significantly lower (P<0.05) than in the cycling stage. In conclusion, ovulation synchronization protocol in anestrous beef cows has limited effectiveness.
