Journal of Rural Medicine
Online ISSN : 1880-4888
Print ISSN : 1880-487X
ISSN-L : 1880-487X
Original article
For which lung cancer patients is re-administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors effective?
Takanobu SasakiToshiharu TabataNaruo Yoshimura
Author information
JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS

2021 Volume 16 Issue 4 Pages 256-262

Details
Abstract

Objective: Currently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) play a central role in the treatment of lung cancer. However, ICI re-administration is still uncommon, and its utility should be evaluated as early as possible.

Patients and Methods: Twenty-five patients who received ICIs twice or more in any of the drug treatment lines for advanced/relapsed non-small cell lung cancer were included. OS, PFS, ORR, and DCR were examined, and factors such as age, sex, histopathological type, PD-L1 expression, whether radical surgery was performed, driver gene mutations, and immune-related adverse events (irAEs), were evaluated for their relevance and as prognostic factors.

Results: Of the 25 patients, 17 were men and 8 were women, with an average age of 68 ± 8.4 (range, 48–85 years), and histology was non-squamous cell carcinoma/squamous cell carcinoma in 19/6 cases. One driver gene mutation positive case was included. PD-L1 TPS was ≥50%/1–49%/0–1%/ unknown in 7/8/5/5 cases. The first ICI administered was pembrolizumab/nivolumab/atezolizumab in 5/13/7 cases. The median number of courses was 9 (range, 1–52) months, and the median PFS was 9 (95% CI, 6.0–12.0) months. Cytotoxic chemotherapy or radiation therapy was administered to 6 patients during the interval up to re-administration. The second ICI administered was pembrolizumab/nivolumab/atezolizumab in 5/8/12 cases, and all patients received antibody drugs different from those given as the first ICI. The median number of courses was 5 (range, 1–24), and the median PFS was 3 months (95% CI, 1.0–5.0) months. In 5 of the 6 patients (24%) who achieved PFS of 6 months or longer after re-administration, the order of administration was anti-PD-1 antibody to anti-PD-L1 antibody.

Conclusion: The effect of re-administration is limited, but it may be effective depending on the type of cases and the order of ICI administration. Further studies are required to verify its effectiveness.

Content from these authors
© 2021 by THE JAPANESE ASSOCIATION OF RURAL MEDICINE
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top