Journal of Rural Medicine
Online ISSN : 1880-4888
Print ISSN : 1880-487X
ISSN-L : 1880-487X
Original article
Exploration of factors associated with eGFR slope improvement before and after intensive treatment of patients with diabetic nephropathy at high risk of disease progression: a retrospective cohort study
Mayumi KikuSaori SakoTomomi InadaSachiyo HayashiMitsuhiro TeradaKazuhiko ShibataKosuke Robert Shima
Author information
JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS
Supplementary material

2026 Volume 21 Issue 2 Pages 128-135

Details
Abstract

Objective: To explore the factors that contribute to the improvement in the annual change in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR slope) in patients with diabetic nephropathy at high risk of disease progression, particularly those with an eGFR of less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2.

Methods: We analyzed 64 patients with diabetic nephropathy who underwent treatment to prevent dialysis. We compared data between the eGFR slope maintenance improvement and worsening groups and explored the factors associated with improvement in eGFR slope using multivariable analyses (UMIN000050610).

Results: The mean eGFR before the interventions was 29.6 ± 11.6 mL/min/1.73 m2, and the eGFR slope was −4.1 ± 7.7 mL/min/1.73 m2/year. In the univariable analyses, the eGFR slope was improved by treatment with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) (−5.0 ± 8.3 to −1.1 ± 4.6 mL/min/1.73 m2/year, P<0.01) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) (−5.5 ± 7.3 to −1.3 ± 4.5 mL/min/1.73 m2/year, P<0.01) before and after the interventions. In multivariate analyses, no significant association was observed between eGFR slope and BMI, blood pressure, or HbA1c level. However, there was a significant association between the eGFR slope and treatment with GLP-1RAs ([95% CI −10.17 to −2.70], P<0.01).

Conclusions: GLP-1RAs treatment was notably associated with improvement in eGFR slope in patients with diabetic nephropathy. However, this study has several limitations, including its retrospective design, small sample size, and lack of distinction between monotherapy and combination therapy.

Content from these authors
© 2026 by THE JAPANESE ASSOCIATION OF RURAL MEDICINE

この記事はクリエイティブ・コモンズ [表示 - 非営利 - 改変禁止 4.0 国際]ライセンスの下に提供されています。
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.ja
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top