Journal of Radiation Research
Online ISSN : 1349-9157
Print ISSN : 0449-3060
Regular Papers
Individual Differences in the Radiosensitivity of Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells Detected in Steady-State Human Peripheral Blood
Asami ORIYAKenji TAKAHASHIOsamu INANAMIToshiaki MIURAYoshinao ABEMikinori KUWABARAIkuo KASHIWAKURA
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2008 Volume 49 Issue 2 Pages 113-121

Details
Abstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate the individual differences in radiosensitivity of lineage-committed myeloid hematopoietic progenitors, colony-forming cells (CFC), detected in steady-state human peripheral blood (PB). Mononuclear cells were prepared from the buffy-coat of 30 individuals PB, and were assayed for CFC by semi-solid culture supplemented with cytokines. X irradiation was performed in the range of 0.5-4 Gy at a dose rate of about 80 cGy/min. The mean number of hematopoietic progenitor cells is 5866 α 3408 in 1 ml of buffy-coat, suggesting that the erythroid progenitor cells are the major population. The total CFC radiosensitivity parameter D0 and n value are 1.18 α 0.24 and 1.89 α 0.98, respectively. Using a linear regression analysis, a statistically significant correlation is observed between the D0 value and the surviving fraction at 4 Gy (r = 0.611 p < 0.001). Furthermore, we evaluate the relationship between individual radiosensitivity and the level of antioxidants, plasma uric acid, plasma bilirubin, and intracellular glutathione. No statistically significant correlations are observed, however, between the D0 parameter and the level of antioxidants, plasma uric acid, plasma bilirubin, and intracellular glutathione. The present study demonstrates that there are large individual differences in the radiosensitivity of hematopoietic progenitor cells as detected in steady-state human PB. These differences demonstrate almost no correlation with plasma or intracellular antioxidants. The prediction of individual differences in radiosensitivity of CFC can only be measured by 4 Gy irradiation.
Content from these authors

This article cannot obtain the latest cited-by information.

© 2008 by Journal of Radiation Research Editorial Committee
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top