Abstract
This paper compares results via Reynolds stress model (RSM) with those via standard k-εmodel (KEM) for the flow field around the ASMO vehicle body. Positive diffusion is maintained for RSM by applying eddy viscosity type isotropic model. RSM shows a better body surface pressure distribution and CD than KEM. Secondly, effects of three imitated underbody configurations, i.e.,exhaust pipe, rear suspension and tire house, on CD value of the vehicle are clarified both via RSM and KEM. A rough underbody configuration does not necessarily increase CD value compared with flat underbody, showing possibility of the detailed optimization approach for a better underbody configuration.