Breeding Science
Online ISSN : 1347-3735
Print ISSN : 1344-7610
ISSN-L : 1344-7610
Cassava breeding and agronomy in Asia: 50 years of history and future directions
Al Imran MalikPasajee KongsilVũ Anh NguyễnWenjun OuSholihinPao SreanMN SheelaLuis Augusto Becerra López-LavalleYoshinori UtsumiCheng LuPiya KittipadakulHữu Hỷ NguyễnHernan CeballosTrọng Hiển NguyễnMichael Selvaraj GomezPornsak AiemnakaRicardo LabartaSongbi ChenSuwaluk AmawanSophearith SokLaothao YouabeeMotoaki SekiHiroki TokunagaWenquan WangKaimian LiHai Anh NguyễnVăn Đồng NguyễnLê Huy HàmManabu Ishitani
Author information

2020 Volume 70 Issue 2 Pages 145-166


In Asia, cassava (Manihot esculenta) is cultivated by more than 8 million farmers, driving the rural economy of many countries. The International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), in partnership with national agricultural research institutes (NARIs), instigated breeding and agronomic research in Asia, 1983. The breeding program has successfully released high-yielding cultivars resulting in an average yield increase from 13.0 t ha–1 in 1996 to 21.3 t ha–1 in 2016, with significant economic benefits. Following the success in increasing yields, cassava breeding has turned its focus to higher-value traits, such as waxy cassava, to reach new market niches. More recently, building resistance to invasive pests and diseases has become a top priority due to the emergent threat of cassava mosaic disease (CMD). The agronomic research involves driving profitability with advanced technologies focusing on better agronomic management practices thereby maintaining sustainable production systems. Remote sensing technologies are being tested for trait discovery and large-scale field evaluation of cassava. In summary, cassava breeding in Asia is driven by a combination of food and market demand with technological innovations to increase the productivity. Further, exploration in the potential of data-driven agriculture is needed to empower researchers and producers for sustainable advancement.


Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz), a tropical root crop native to South America, is commonly called as Brazilian arrow root, manioc, tapioca, or yucca, was introduced to Asia in the 1800’s and extensively cultivated in the 20th century in the Philippines, India, Indonesia and later to the rest of Asia (i.e., Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam and China). Today, it is estimated that more than 8 million farmers grow cassava in Asia covering approximately 4.2 million ha (Howeler et al. 2013). Over the last 40 years, the demand for cassava has changed rapidly from a direct food crop to an industrial crop to use mainly as an animal feed and also processing into many different products such as sweeteners and starch as forecasted by Cock (1982), thus driving the rural economies of many countries in Asia.

In the late 1970’s, CIAT started to focus on cassava breeding and agronomy during this time of industrialization since different Asian countries differ in their objectives for cassava production, which indicates the diversity of development needed in this sector. For example, Thailand, Cambodia and Vietnam largely cultivate cassava as an industrial crop, processed and exported to China, Europe and the United States whereas cassava continued to be an important food crop in India, Indonesia, and the Philippines.

Despite its economic importance, breeding for crop improvement has been difficult in the past years that might be due to the heterozygous genetic makeup of the crop, improved varieties have been developed only recently, when compared with other crops (Ceballos et al. 2004, Kawano et al. 1978, Kawano 2003, 2011, Lynam and Byerlee 2017). Nevertheless, research on improved agronomic practices, such as identifying optimum planting time, tillage operation, preparation of planting material, weed control, intercropping and soil erosion control (Howeler 1991, Howeler and Aye 2014) has resulted in the better understanding of the crop potential to improve production. In early 1980’s, CIAT initiated the cassava breeding program in Asia jointly with NARIs and within a short period of time, a significant progress in adopting new cassava varieties was achieved as the major biotic constraints did not appear until more recently. Over the years, cassava production in Asia has increased 4.5 fold, due to a 1.8-fold increase in cultivation area and 2.5-fold increase in yield (FAO 2018, and calculated from Table 1).

Table 1. Cassava production and agronomic practices in Asia (adopted and modified from Howeler and Aye 2014)
Cambodia China India Indonesia Lao PDR Philippines Thailand Vietnam
1Production (’000 t) 10,207 4,794 4,554 20,775 3,096 2,815 31,161 11,045
1Harvest area (’000 ha) 388 291 204 867 94 225 1,462 580
1Yield (t ha–1) 25.9 16.2 21.9 23.5 32.2 12.3 21.0 18.7
2Cropping system:
Monocrop (%) 95 40 70 40 66 60 95 65
Intercrop (%) 5 60 30 60 34 40 5 35
2Land preparation Tractor Oxen/hoe Hoe/oxen Hoe/oxen Hoe/no till Hoe/oxen Tractor Oxen/hoe/tractor
2Time of planting Apr–May Mar Apr–May Oct–Nov Apr–Jun Apr–May Feb–May Mar–Sep
2Weeding Hoe Hoe/herbicides Hoe Hoe Hoe/knife Hoe/knife Hoe/herbicides Hoe
Inorganic 6–38% Low–high Med–high 50–95% >1% Very little Up to 75% 74–85%
Organic 1.3% N/A N/A 22–32% >1% Some N/A 1–6%

Several reviews are available on cassava breeding and agronomy (Howeler et al. 2013, Howeler and Aye 2014) and this review paper focuses on the 50 years of history of cassava breeding and agronomy research, its recent developments and future research directions.

History of cassava breeding in Asia

Cassava plays a major role in poverty alleviation, yet this crop has only recently started to receive attention from public and private research institutions. Major systematic research on improving cassava production started soon after the establishment of the International Agricultural Research Centre’s (IARC) (Raitzer and Kelley 2008). In 1969, CIAT started building a cassava germplasm collection and in 1972, established its Cassava Program by assembling a multidisciplinary team to conduct both basic and applied research. Later in 1983, CIAT established a regional cassava breeding cooperation program for Asia based in Thailand (Kawano et al. 1986, Kawano 2003, Lynam and Byerlee 2017).

Conventional breeding still continues to be the main method for cassava varietal development worldwide and had strong impact on addressing the constraints of cassava growers (Lynam and Byerlee 2017). Conventional cassava breeding methods incorporate the production of full-sib or half-sib progenies, which are evaluated through mass selection. More attention should be given to the evaluation and selection criteria of individual genotypes, as each plant is genetically distinct and later would be released as varieties to the farmers (Ceballos et al. 2015). Therefore, the selected plants with desired characteristics involves a series of clonal generations with progressively fewer genotypes, larger plot sizes and more locations (Kawano et al. 1998) leading to the release of superior varieties (Ceballos et al. 2012, 2016, Kawano 2003).

In the past two decades, with the advent of advanced molecular breeding and phenomics, significant progress has been made in cassava crop improvement and there have been several examples, such as developing disease resistance (Fondong 2017), reducing cyanide toxicity (Narayanan et al. 2011), enhancing nutritional value (Bouis et al. 2011), and improving starch yield and quality (Karlström et al. 2016). These technologies have also increased fundamental knowledge related to breeding, planting, nutrition, and the processing of cassava (Becerra López-Lavalle 2017, Chapuis et al. 2017, Ferguson et al. 2012, Yuniwati et al. 2015).

The cassava breeding program at CIAT has focused on a wide range of objectives from yield optimization under diverse environmental conditions to maximizing the starch quality and quantity. During the period from 1992 to 1995, CIAT reached an important milestone in Thailand, releasing a variety called Kasetsart 50 (KU50) which was initially selected by the Kasetsart University after CIAT provided the cross parents. KU50 is still grown by Thai growers occupying more than 1 million ha across South East Asia (Labarta et al. 2017, Rojanaridpiched et al. 2007, 2010). By 1995, CIAT had made notable progress in breeding improved cassava varieties with superior qualities, specifically with fresh root yield (FRY) and dry matter content (DMC) (Kawano 2003). As the genetic gains in yields (FRY and DMC) have slowed down, cassava breeders have shifted their attention to other value-added traits that are easier to breed such as nutritional quality (Ceballos et al. 2016, Ceballos and Hershey 2016).

However, to date, advanced genomic and genetic tools have contributed in describing the crop’s genetic diversity (Bradbury et al. 2013, de Oliveira et al. 2014, Fregene et al. 2003), diagnostics of cassava pest and diseases (Bart et al. 2012, Legg et al. 2011), gene expression studies (Amuge et al. 2017, Ballén-Taborda et al. 2013), resistance to CMD in African germplasm (Egesi et al. 2006, Okogbenin et al. 2007), as well as post-harvest physiological deterioration (PPD) gene profiling in cassava roots (Reilly et al. 2007, Wilson et al. 2017). Therefore, recent developments in genomic research will help facilitate cassava breeding by providing knowledge and tools for attributes or traits for cassava improvement (de Oliveira et al. 2012, Wang et al. 2014, Wolfe et al. 2016).

In the past 50 years, CIAT’s cassava breeding program has identified germplasm on specific traits of interest and developed elite progenies (Kawano et al. 1978) which were then distributed to the national breeding programs in several Asian countries (Kawano et al. 1986, Lynam and Byerlee 2017). In the following sections, we focus on country-specific breeding programs, most of which are in collaboration with CIAT.


Cassava improvement and production in Thailand has been continued for more than 40 years. The breeding program was started by the Department of Agriculture in 1937 with the germplasm introduced from Malaysia and the Philippines and later from the Virgin Islands and Colombia. Initially, the breeding objectives were focused on FRY, dried root yield, starch content, harvest index and plant type (Kawano 2003, Kittipadakul et al. 2017). The current breeding program aims at developing varieties suitable for industrial purposes that are both edible and resistant to pest and diseases. As cassava is a heterozygous plant, attempts have been made to develop improved cassava hybrids with increased yield as like the success with maize. This process has been challenging due to high inbreeding depression that renders selfed lines of cassava with less reproductive potential. Experiences gained on flowering induction and synchronization in Thailand were shared with cassava breeders in other Asian countries (Kittipadakul et al. 2017) as they are identified as the major bottlenecks in cassava breeding.

Rayong 1 was the popular cassava landrace grown in Thailand from 1950 till 1970. Breeding attempts were made in combination of local varieties, Rayong 1 and Jek-Kui and released varieties including Rayong 60, Sriracha 1, Rayong 72 and Kasetsart 50 (KU50). Since 1975, 19 cassava varieties have been released in Thailand (Table 2), with many cultivated throughout Asia. In 1983, a large number of cassava germplasm was imported from CIAT-HQ, Colombia to the Rayong Field Crops Research Center (RYFCRC) under the Thai-CIAT joint breeding program. In the early 1990s, the breeding program was started using this imported germplasm. Furthermore, a cooperation between CIAT and the Department of Agriculture (DOA) under the Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives was established in 1983 to include germplasm exchange from CIAT (collection at RYFCRC) as parents (Kawano 2003, Rojanaridpiched et al. 2007, 2010). Among other cassava varieties released, KU50 is a good example of successful cassava breeding in Thailand, with its higher yield and starch content than Rayong 1. Currently, KU50 is cultivated on more than 1 million hectares in Thailand and Vietnam (as KM94) and also cultivated in Indonesia, Cambodia, Myanmar, and the Philippines (Gracen et al. 2017). In 2017, with the research data from 39 trials conducted across Thailand, the Thai Tapioca Development Institute (TTDI) and Kasetsart University, jointly released Huay Bong 90 (HB90), a cassava variety with a fresh root yield of 31.8 t ha–1 (45% higher than Rayong 1) whereas KU50, HB60, and HB80 had 38, 37, and 42% more fresh root yield, respectively. The average starch content of HB90 was 25.7%, which was similar to that of HB80. HB90 has an upright plant type, which is suitable for mechanical harvesting. In 2017, the TTDI distributed 633,850 HB90 stems to farmers (unpublished data).

Table 2. Varieties developed and released in Thailand since 1975 and their agronomic performance
Variety name Pedigree/parents Traits of interest Yield
(t ha–1)
Year of
or release
1Rayong 1 Landrace Highly adapted to environment 20.1 18.3 1975 Sarakarn et al. 2000
Rayong 3 MMex55 × MVen307 High starch content 17.1 23–28 1983 Sarakarn et al. 2000
Rayong 2 MCol113 × MCol22 Moderate hydrocyanic acid content 25.6 18.3 1984 Sarakarn et al. 2000
Rayong 60 MCol1684 × Rayong 1 Early bulking 26.3 20–25 1987 Sarakarn et al. 2000
Rayong 90 CMC76 × V43 High starch content 23.8 24–29 1991 Sarakarn et al. 2000
Rayong 5 27-77-10 × Rayong 3 High yield 27.5 23–27 1994 Sarakarn et al. 2000
Rayong 72 Rayong 1 × Rayong 5 High yield, drought tolerant 31.9 20–24 1999 Sarakarn et al. 2000
Rayong 7 CMR30-71-25 × OMR29-20-118 High yield, drought tolerant 38.1 23–29 2005 Prammanee et al. 2010
Rayong 9 CMR31-19-23 × OMR29-20-118 High yield and starch content 30.6 24–31 2006 Prammanee et al. 2010
Rayong 11 Rayong 5 × OMR29-20-118 High starch content 29.8 26–32 2010 DOA 2013
Rayong 86 Kasetsart 50 × Rayong 11 High yield and starch content 28.2 26–33 2013 Hansethasuk et al. 2016
2Sriracha 1 MKU2-162 × Rayong 1 High yield 20.1 21.9 1990 Sarakarn et al. 2000
Kasetsart 50 Rayong 90 × Rayong 1 Highly adapted to environment, high starch content 32.5 24.9 1992 Prammanee et al. 2010
Kasetsart 72 Rayong 5 × OMR29-20-118 Highly adapted to environment, high yield 31.3 27 2015 Chaisri et al. 2013
3Huay Bong 60 Kasetsart 50 × Rayong 5 High yield and starch content 36.3 25.1 2003 TTDI 2018
Huay Bong 80 Kasetsart 50 × Rayong 5 High yield and starch content 34.4 27.3 2008 Kittipadakul et al. 2012
Huay Bong 90 MKUC34-114-235 open-pollinated Straight plant type, easy to mechanically harvest, high yield and starch content 31.8 25.7 2017 Unpublished data
4Pirun 1 Huay Bong 60 × Hanatee High yield 41.3 28.7 2014 Unpublished data
Pirun 2 Huay Bong 60 × Hanatee Moderate hydrocyanic acid content 36.3 24.7 2015 Unpublished data

1 All Rayong varieties are from the breeding program of the Rayong Field Crops Research Center (RYFCRC), Department of Agriculture (DOA), Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperative; 2 Sriracha 1 and Kasetsart (KU) varieties are from Kasetsart University; 3 Huay Bong varieties are from the breeding program at Kasetsart University and Thai Tapioca Development Institute; 4 Pirun varieties are from the breeding program at The National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA) and Mahidol University.

The success of cassava improvement in Thailand was possible with the strong cooperation between government and private sectors. The Department of Agricultural Extension, the Cooperative Promotion Department, and the TTDI Foundation played a major role in distributing new varieties to Thai farmers (Rojanaridpiched and Srinives 1986). The RYFCRC under the DOA, a primary research centre of cassava in Thailand, maintains a duplicated set of the CIAT cassava core collection of 628 accessions. The RYFCRC has developed and released ten cassava varieties for industrial purpose and one sweet variety for human consumption (Table 2).

The collaboration between CIAT and Thai cassava researchers has evolved over the time as the Thai research capacity expanded and enhanced the breeding populations. Excellent germplasm has been released with a huge potential to improve the yield and increase the farmer’s income (Johnson et al. 2003, Kawano 2011). Simultaneously, the emerging biological threats, such as the appearance of mealybug in 2010 (which could be controlled by biological control agents) (Parsa et al. 2012) and the recent identification of Sri Lankan cassava mosaic virus (SLCMV) (Wang et al. 2016), requires regional and international efforts. Through the systemic approach and continuous collaboration between Thai-research institutions and CIAT, source of CMD resistance was introduced in 2011 and the introgressed lines are being selected aggressively as the result of the first report of SLCMV in the region (Wang et al. 2016).

Cassava, a high potential industrial crop, is highly valued for it starch worldwide. “Waxy cassava starch”, an amylose-free waxy mutants found in many crops and considered as a high-value trait. The relative proportions of the two components of starch (20% amylose and 80% amylopectin) strongly influence the functional properties of the starch as do most starches from other crops (Ceballos et al. 2007). In 2007, CIAT reported the discovery of a spontaneous mutation in cassava that resulted in the production of amylose-free starch (Aiemnaka et al. 2012, Ceballos et al. 2007). The TTDI and CIAT signed a joint agreement to develop commercial cassava varieties with waxy starch adapted to Thailand. The work was undertaken with the leadership of Kasetsart University and resulted in the identification of three clones with satisfactory agronomic performance, which were the first commercial cassava varieties with this trait. Waxy cassava starch has 25% higher viscosity to normal cassava and produce clearer gels that are more stable (acid and alkaline resistance, shear, refrigeration, and freeze/thaw stability) than non-waxy cassava starch (Sánchez et al. 2010).


Cassava breeding efforts in Vietnam were first reported in 1975. Significant achievements were documented after 1988 as a result of capacity building and germplasm introduction from CIAT (Kim et al. 1999, 2001). A systematic cassava breeding program began after a collaborative survey in 1991–1992, conducted by CIAT, the International Development Research Centre (IDRC), International Potato Center (CIP), and national organizations, including the Root Crops Research and Development Center (RCRDC) and Hung Loc Agricultural Research Center (HLARC) in 270 cassava cultivation sites of 43 provinces in Vietnam and collected 128 cassava varieties. These varieties, along with the materials from CIAT-HQ, China, Thailand and other countries, have been used for breeding and selection (Nguyen et al. 1995, 2012, Quyen and Kim 1995). As a result, 19 new varieties were registered in the last 20 years (Table 3). To date, all registered cassava varieties were bred through conventional approaches including open and controlled pollination and mutation breeding.

Table 3. Varieties developed and released in Vietnam and their agronomic performance
Variety Pedigree/parents Traits of interest Yield
(t ha–1)
Year of
or release
KM60 Original name Rayong 60, introduced from Thailand High yield, good root shape, early harvest, yellow flesh 27–32 26.4–27.8 1995 Quyen et al. 1995
KM94 Original name KU50, introduced from Thailand High yield and starch content, highly branched, prone to lodging, throughout Vietnam 30–40 n.a. 1995 Quyen et al. 1995
SM937-26 Introduced from Thailand High yield and starch content, drought resistant, suitable for marginal land 30–38 n.a. 1995 Quyen et al. 1995
KM98-1 Selected from F1 hybrid seeds, Rayong 1 × Rayong 5 High yield and starch content, early harvestability, good plant type, DMC: 38.6%, Tay Ninh province 32–35 27.5–28.2 1999 Kim et al. 1999
KM98-5 Selected from F1 hybrid seeds, Rayong 1 × Rayong 5 DMC: 40.1%, Tay Ninh province 34.5–n.a. 26.1–28.4 2007, 2009 Kim et al. 2007
KM140 Selected from F1 hybrid seeds, Rayong 1 × Rayong 5 Low cyanogenic content, suitable for fresh consumption, southern provinces and Cambodia 30–50 n.a. 2007, 2009 Kim et al. 2015
KM98-7 Selected from F1 hybrid seeds, Rayong 1 × Rayong 5 Oblong leaf blade, drought resistant, suitable for marginal land, northern provinces n.a. n.a. 2008 Loan et al. 2008
Sa21-12 n.a. Suitable for marginal land, northern provinces 38–40 28–30 2012 Nguyen et al. 2012
Sa06 Original name Rayong 9, introduced from Thailand Low branching, North and Central Highlands 36–42 >30 2016 Kim et al. 2015
*KM419 Southeastern provinces, Central Highlands and Cambodia >40 n.a. 2016 Kim et al. 2015
*HLS11 Selected from F1 hybrid seeds (SM937-26 × KM60) DMC: >40%, erect stem, no branching, southern provinces 40–42 >30 2016 Nguyen et al. 2016
*BK n.a. Starch and fresh consumption, northern and central provinces 47–52 27 2016 Unpublished data
*HLS10 Selected from F1 hybrid seeds (KM146 × KM140) Southeastern provinces and Central Highlands 43.2–47.3 27.2 2016 Nguyen et al. 2016
*HL2004-28 (KM444) n.a. DMC: 40.3%, northern provinces 35.5–na 29.0–31.2 2016 Kim et al. 2015
*DT4 (Rayong 72) n.a. DMC: >40%, northern and central provinces 39.9–43.3 >30 2016 Kim et al. 2015
*KM7 Selected from F1 hybrid seeds from SM937-26 Southern and central provinces 37.6–40.5 n.a. 2016 Unpublished data
*STB1 (KM440) n.a. DMC: 39.2%, northern and central province 33–42 28–30 2017 Kim et al. 2015
*KM101 Original name CMR29-56-101, introduced from Colombia DMC: >38%, southern provinces 37–42 >28 2017 Nguyen et al. 2016
*10Sa01 DMC: >40%, southeastern region 38–42 30 2017 Unpublished data

* Test production, not approved for national release; n.a. = not available; DMC = dry matter content.

To understand the impact of cassava breeding in Vietnam, the Agricultural Genetics Institute (AGI), HLARC, Institute of Agricultural Sciences in Southern Vietnam (IAS) and CIAT carried out a second survey on cassava varietal adoption study in 2016. Genotyping by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array identified a total of 152 unique cassava varieties and landraces (Le et al. 2019), which are now maintained in the field by RCRDC. The survey revealed that 85% of the total cassava area is planted to improved varieties. KM94 (KU50), bred in Thailand and released in Vietnam in 1992, remains the dominant variety occupying 45% of area and with KM419, a locally-bred variety released in 2013, already planted on 30% (161,924 ha) of the total cassava area in Vietnam, and the rest were planted with other varieties bred by Vietnam breeding programs (Le et al. 2019).

To broaden the genetic base of cassava in Vietnam, 55 elite cassava lines were imported from CIAT-HQ in 2015, which are maintained at the International Laboratory for Cassava Molecular Breeding (ILCMB) jointly established by AGI and CIAT in 2012. These lines are currently being evaluated in different eco-regions of Vietnam to determine their suitability. Recently, breeding for disease resistance has received attention after severe outbreaks of cassava witches’ broom disease (CWBD) in Central and South East regions (Graziosi et al. 2016) and SLCMV in Tay Ninh province, 2017 (Uke et al. 2018, Wang et al. 2016).


Historically, cassava breeding in China involved collecting, evaluating and testing exotic and indigenous germplasm. However, with the increase in cassava consumption and industrial demand, breeding programs started to focus on developing cold- and drought-tolerant varieties that enable farmers to cultivate cassava further north (above 25°N latitude). Other breeding objectives include meeting the growing demands of different industrial sectors, such as (1) increasing yields and starch content for the biofuel industry; (2) increasing protein and carotenoid contents for the food industry; and (3) using molecular tools to breed varieties for the biochemical industry (i.e., molecular breeding).

Over the years, numerous varieties have been released by the Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences (CATAS) for cassava cultivating regions in China (Table 4). SC205, a popular variety bred 30 years ago, is still cultivated on 60–70% of the total cassava plantation area. Nanzhi 199 and XX048 are becoming popular and covers 50–60% of the plantation area in the mid- and high-latitude zones, of which Nanzhi 199 is not only a high yielding variety but also produces higher starch content with shorter phenotype and XX048 produces high yield, but with lower starch content (unpublished data). After successful field evaluations conducted by CIAT with support of the Nippon Foundation, the CATAS cassava breeding team released six new varieties; SC9, SC10, SC11, SC12, SC13 and SC14 (Chen et al. 2014, 2017a). SC9, an edible variety with yellow flesh and good cooking quality, has been widely planted by smallholder farmers. SC12 and SC13 are mainly planted in Hainan and SC14 is tolerant to PPD. Three other varieties, H1071, ITBB01 and ITBB04, have undergone regional testing in the last five years and ready to be released in the near future. In particular, ITBB04 is a high-yielding variety with desirable plant phenotype (short), erect petioles, plump storage roots suitable for mechanical harvest (Chen et al. 2014, 2017a), and moderate waterlogging tolerance (personal observation).

Table 4. Varieties developed and released in China and their agronomic performance
Cultivar Pedigree Traits Yield
Crop duration (days) Starch
Year of
SC6068 SC201 High starch content 20.6–24.5 27.0 1965 Xiong et al. 2000
SC124 F1 of nature hybrid seeds from SC205 High yield, low starch, high tolerance to cold 30.0–32.5 24.5 1991 Xiong et al. 2000
NZ188 CM321-188 High yield, low starch, poor cold tolerance 22.5 1992 Yan et al. 2015
SC8002 SC124 × SC205 High yield 27.8–28.7 27.0 1994 Xiong et al. 1995
SC8013 SC124 × SC205 High starch content 25.3–29.5 28.9 1994 Xiong et al. 1995
GR891 MCOL2215 × MPAN High yield, high starch content, short duration 32 29–31 1998 Yan et al. 2015
GR911 MBra35 × CM523-7 High yield 43 27–28 1999 Yan et al. 2015
GR3 1150 hybrid seeds were introduced from Thailand field crop
research center in 1994, and selected one from those hybrid seeds
High yield, high starch content 40 29–30 2007 Yan et al. 2015
GR1 Rayong 1 × Rayong 90/KU50 High yield, high starch content 40 27–28 2008 Yan et al. 2015
GR4 CIAT Natural hybrid seeds from PAR164 /line SM1600 High yield, high starch content 41 26–28 2011 Yan et al. 2015
GR5 Huay Bong 60 (R5 × KU50) 39 29–31 2011 Yan et al. 2015
GR6 CIAT Natural hybrid seeds from CM4729-2/line SM2895-1 High yield, high starch content 30 29–30 2012 Unpublished data
GR7 CIAT Natural hybrid seeds from Cn9948-1 (Sm805-15 × Sm1438-02) High yield, high starch content 42 29–30 2015 Unpublished data
GR8 Line KM316 was introduced from Vietnam southern academy of agricultural sciences, HLARC (KM98-1 × KU50) High yield, high starch content 39 28–29 2016 Unpublished data
GR9 The wild cassava germplasm, named Singkonggajah (elephant cassava), was introduced from the tropical rain forest of
Kalimantan province, Indonesia in 2010
High yield, high starch content 30 29–31 2016 Unpublished data
SC5 ZM8625 × SC8013 High yield, high starch content 33.0– 28.5 2000 Yan et al. 2015
SC6 OMR33-10-4 High starch content, typhoon resistant, good germination 25.0– 28.5 2001 Yan et al. 2015
SC7 F1 of nature hybrid seeds from SC205 High dry matter content and high starch content 42.61 27.3 2004 Ye et al. 2007
SC8 F1 of natural hybrid seeds from CMR38-120 High yield, high starch content, strong adaptability, tolerance to fertilizer, poor soil, drought weather, and typhoon
38–45 240 30–32 2004 Ye et al. 2006
SC9 Introduced from Philippines around 1820 Good taste, low cyanic content, high starch content, early harvest, heavy branches 20–35 210 30–33 2005 Yan et al. 2015
SC10 CM4042 × CM4077 High yield, high starch content 30–45 300 30–32 2006 Yan et al. 2015
SC11 Introduced from Brazil (Line named B900) High yield, low starch, stronger tolerance to fertilizer and waterlogging 30 300 25–28 2009 Yan et al. 2015
SC12 OMR36-34-1 × ZM99247 High yield, high starch content, low cyanic content, strong adaptability, tolerance to fertilizer, drought weather, and
resistance to bacterial blight and vermilion mites
40 300 30–32 2014 Ye et al. 2014
SC13 F1 of natural hybrid seeds from SC8013 High yield, high starch content, low cyanic content, resistance to bacterial blight and vermilion mites 43 240 29–30 2015 Ye et al. 2017
SC14 Landrace of Qionzhong Hainan China High yield, low starch, low cyanic content, strong adaptability, tolerance to PPD 38.25 330 23–26 2016 Qin et al. 2017
Guishu JS03 Selected from F1 population of cassava cultivar from the Balai district, Xayaburi Province, Laos High yield, high starch content 37.5–52.5 300–330 29–30 2015 Unpublished data
Guimushu 1 Selected from F1 population of line E497, introduced from TCGRI CATAS, the plant line number was GW10-E497-2, and the regional test number was E30 High yield, high starch content 39–52.5 300–330 29–30 2016 Wei et al. 2016
Guimushu 2 Selected from F1 population of line E497, introduced from CATAS, the plant line number was GW10-E497-10 High yield, low starch content, no branches 37.5–48 300–330 24–25 2016 unpublished data
Guimushu 3 Selected from F1 population of line E497, introduced from CATAS, the plant line number was GW10-E497-17 High yield, high starch content, few branches 37.5–48 300–330 30–31 2016 unpublished data
Guimushu 4 Selected from F1 population of line E497, introduced from CATAS, the plant line number was GW10-E497-19 High yield, high starch content, few branches 37.5–48 300–330 29–31 2016 unpublished data
Guimushu 5 Selected from F1 population of SC205, the plant line number was WG10-SC205-1 High yield, high starch content, few branches 37.5–52.5 240–270 30–33 2016 Unpublished data
Guimushu 6 Selected from the F1 population of Xinxuan 048, the new cassava variety was developed through embryo rescue, tissue culture, rapid propagation, and the test number was NK-6 High yield, high starch content, few branches 39–52.5 300–330 28–30 2016 Unpublished data
Guimushu 7 Selected from the F1 population of Xinxuan 048, the new cassava variety was developed through embryo rescue, tissue culture, rapid propagation, and the test number was NK-7 High yield, high starch content, good plan type, good germinates and good growth vigor 30–37.5 300–330 29–31 2016 Unpublished data
Fuxuan 01 Using cassava variety SC124 as material and selected and bred from its variant strain by radiation mutagenesis High yield, high starch content, stem good to storage, germinated quickly and neatly, and had high germination rate, wide adaptability, cold and drought resistance 30–45 30–32 2005 Yan et al. 2015
Xinxuan 048 From natural variation of cassava germplasm ZM93-16 population High yield, high starch content, stem germinates quickly and neatly, and had high germination rate, wide adaptability, suitable for sparse planting, intercropping and mechanical planting 40–50 240 28–30 2006 Yan et al. 2015
Xixuan 03 From natural variation of cassava germplasm ZM92-174 population High yield, high starch content, stem good to storage 34.5 29–31 2007 Yan et al. 2015
Xixuan 04 From natural variation of cassava germplasm OMR-38-136-1 population High yield, high starch content, stem germinates quickly and neatly, and had high germination rate, wide adaptability, resistance to pest and disease, tolerance to cold 46–57 30–31 2010 Yan et al. 2015
Xixuan 05 Using cassava variety Xinxuan 048 as material and selected and bred from its variant strain by radiation mutagenesis High yield, high starch content, no branches 52–70 29–31 2013 Yan et al. 2015
Xixuan 06 Using cassava variety Xinxuan 048 as material and selected and bred from its variant strain by radiation mutagenesis High yield, high starch content, no branches. tolerance to drought and cold 50–59 30–31 2014 Yan et al. 2015
Xixuan 07 Using cassava variety Xinxuan 048 as material and selected and bred from its variant strain by radiation mutagenesis High yield, high starch content, no branches. Stem germinates quickly and neatly, and had high germination rate 53–70 31–32 2016 Unpublished data
GK 09-26 SC5 × SC205 High yield, low starch, strong adaptability, tolerance to cold, fertilizer, poor soil, drought weather, pests and diseases 45–48 300 28 2014 Unpublished data
GK 09-11 SC5 × SC205 High yield, high starch, strong adaptability 37.5–45 30–31 2015 Unpublished data
NZ 199 Introduced tissue culture seedlings from CIAT High yield, high starch content, easy to harvest, low cyanic content 30–45 240–270 30 An et al. 2014

In Guangxi province, the cassava breeding program released four varieties; GR891, GR911, GR4 and GR6. Among them, GR891 and GR911 have good starch quality suitable for both commercial production and food and have been planted in the northern area of Guangxi province. On the other hand, GR4 has a single stem which is considered as a very good plant type and is planted in the higher latitude regions (unpublished data).

First generation markers, such as simple sequence repeat (SSR), inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), are regularly used to select the qualitative traits, for example, for resistance to CMD and PPD (Nzuki et al. 2017). In addition to Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) markers, a new simplified re-sequencing technique, called amplified-fragments SNP and methylation (AFSM) approach for genotype profiling was developed in China (Xia et al. 2014). Using this method, 760 cassava lines including 200 landraces from Brazil, 150 accessions from CIAT, 156 collections from China and 254 individuals from a hybridized population of KU50 × SC124, have been genotyped (unpublished data). Large amounts of phenotyping data, collected over a three-year field evaluation across Asia and America, were used to identify whole genome markers for storage root yield, root starch quality, plant and leaf type, and tolerance to cold and drought (unpublished data). In addition, another 350 accessions collected from CIAT, Brazil and Asia during 2013–2018, were also added to the national cassava genebank collection. This collection, with more than 1,000 accessions, has been screened for desirable plant types (i.e., less branching, short height and short duration), tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses, and high starch content and composition (Zou et al. 2017, unpublished data).

In the last 10 years, stable and highly efficient cassava transgenic techniques without genotype dependence have been developed and used to elucidate gene functions in cassava (Liu et al. 2011). At least four important genes, including two CC-type glutaredoxins (GRXs: MeGRX058, MeGRX785), MeSuSy4, a gene encoding the sucrose-hydrolysing enzyme and MeSOD, superoxide dismutase gene, have been over-expressed and knocked out to reveal the mechanisms of drought and PPD tolerance (unpublished data). Furthermore, silencing granule bound starch synthase II (GBSSII) gene in cassava created a waxy cassava clone with almost 98% amylopectin (Zhao et al. 2011), and overexpression of filamenting temperature-sensitive Z1 (MeFtsZ1) gene enlarged the starch granules of transgenic lines (unpublished data).

Despite the above-mentioned successes of cassava breeding in China, many physiological and agronomical traits are still need to be addressed. Farmer-preferred cultivars adapted to lower temperatures with early maturity (Zou et al. 2017) and high yielding in the regions above 25°N latitude are still need to be developed. Furthermore, commercial varieties need integrated resistant genes for cassava bacterial blight (CBB), green mites and PPD.


Cassava was introduced to Kerala state as a food crop from Brazil and slowly spread into the neighbouring states of Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh as an industrial crop (Srinivas 2009). Intensive cassava breeding research started after the establishment of the Central Tuber Crop Research Institute (CTCRI) in 1963. The CTCRI maintains a rich genetic resource comprising of indigenous, exotic, landraces and breeding lines including wild relatives of cassava. In 1996, CIAT and CTCRI collaborated by accepting different combinations of F1 seeds (Abraham et al. 2001).

Early breeding research used extensive inter-varietal crosses between superior varieties and recombinant lines. More recently, the CTCRI’s extensive breeding program, with interspecific hybridization mutation breeding and propagation of cassava from true seeds has developed varieties with high yielding, high dry matter and starch contents, early harvestability, and resistance to pests and diseases. Although most of the released varieties are diploid (Table 5), the triploid cassava is correlated with growth vigor, increased starch content and higher tuber yield (e.g., Sree Harsa, Sreekumari et al. 1999). In addition, heterotic (e.g., Sree Reka and Sree Prabha) varieties have also been developed (Easwari et al. 2000). Sree Harsha is the first triploid cassava variety released with very high yield potential (60 t ha–1) and starch content (38–41%). Two other triploid hybrids viz., Sree Athulya and Sree Apporva, with high extractable starch content (>30%) were released in 2013. Several short duration (5–7 months) varieties viz., Sree Jaya, Sree Vijaya and Vellayani Hrazwa, have also been developed and ideal for planting in paddy fallow in Kerala. On the other hand, H-226 and H-165 are the most popular varieties in the industrial belt of Tamil Nadu. CO-1, Sree Sahya, Sree Visakham, CO-3, H-119, CO (TP-4), Mulluvadai, Kumkumarose and Sree Rekha are also grown in Tamil Nadu.

Table 5. Varieties released in India and its agronomical performance
Cultivar Pedigree Trait of interest Yield
Number of days to
Year of
H-97 Manjavella × Accession No. 300 (Brazillian seedling selection) Conical short roots, drought tolerant 25–30 290–310 27–31 1971 Magoon et al. 1970
H-165 Chadyamangalam Vella × Kalikalan Early maturing, tolerant to spider mite and scale insect 35–38 240–260 25 1971 Magoon et al. 1970
H-226 Ethakkakaruppan × M-4 High yield under irrigation, tolerant to spider mite and scale insects 30–35 290–310 29 1971 Magoon et al. 1970
Sree Visakham (H-1687) Accession No 1501 (landrace) × S-2312 (Madagascar) Compact root, high yield, high carotene content, less susceptible to spider mite and scale insect 33–38 290–310 28 1977 Jos et al. 1981
Sree Sahya (H-2304) Multiple hybrid involving, Accession No 468 (from Madagascar), 174, 3024, 1310, 82, 3919, 3588 and M-4 High yield, highly resistant to drought and moderate resistant to leaf sport 35–40 300–320 31 1977 Jos et al. 1981
Sree Prakash (S-856) Selection from indigenous germplasm accession High yield, short duration, non-branching plants, suitable for lowland cultivation 35–40 220–240 29 1987 Nair et al. 1988
Sree Jaya Selection from indigenous germplasm accession Early maturing, suitable for lowland cultivation as a rotation crop, white flesh colour and excellent cooking quality 26–30 180–220 27 1998 Abraham et al. 2001
Sree Vijaya Selection from germplasm collection High yield, short duration, yellow after cooking 25–28 180 27–30 1998 Unnikrishnan et al. 2002
Sree Harsha Triploid (OP-4 (2x) × H-2304 (4x) Erect non-branching, high starch content 35–40 300 38–41 1996 Unnikrishnan et al. 2002
Sree Athulya Triplod progeny of local diploid clone OP-4 and induced tetraploid of ‘Sree Visakham’ High yielding triploid, high starch content 40–50 300 35 2013 CTCRI 2017
Sree Apoorva Triploid progeny of local diploid variety Ambakkadan with the induced tetraploid of Sree Sahya High yielding triploid, non/top branching 40–50 300 33 2013 CTCRI 2017
Sree Swarna Clonal selection from indigenous germplasm (Arumasa
High yield, yellow flesh, tolerant to CMD 40 210 25 2014 CTCRI 2017
Sree Pavithra Clonal selection from indigenous germplasm (Aniyoor local) High yield, high K efficiency (243.65 kg tuber/kg K absorbed), good cooking quality, low cynogenic compound 35–45 270–300 25 2014 CTCRI 2017
Nidhi Clonal selection Short duration 25 200 26 1993 Abraham et al. 2001
KMC-1 Clonal selection Short duration 30.5 200 26 1998 Abraham et al. 2001
Sree Rekha Top cross hybrid - TMS.63198 (selfed) × Sree Visakham High yield, can grow in upland and lowland condition, tolerant to leaf spot and spider mite 45–48 240–300 27–29 2000 Unnikrishnan et al. 2002
Sree Prabha Top cross hybrid - TMS.63173-4 (selfed) × Sree Visakham High yield, medium height plant type, suitable for upland and lowland, tolerant to leaf spot and spider mite 40–45 300 26–28 2000 Unnikrishnan et al. 2002
Sree Padmanabha Introduced from CIAT, Colombia- MNga1 CMD resistant variety 38 270–300 n.a. 2006 CTCRI 2019
CO-1 Clonal selection from local variety High yield 30 240–270 n.a 1977 Abraham et al. 2001
CO-2 Clonal selection from an open pollinated seedling progeny High yield 35 240–270 n.a 1984 Abraham et al. 2001
CO-3 Clonal selection from an open pollinated seedling of Nigerian origin High yield 42 240 n.a. 1993 Abraham et al. 2001
MVD-1 Clonal selection from Demonstrated CMD tolerance 34.5 270 n.a. Abraham et al. 2001
Sree Reksha Clonal Selection from CIAT hybrid, CR24-4 (CM79515XC-18) High yield, resistance to cassava mosaic disease caused by SLCMV & ICMV, tolerance to post harvest physiological deterioration 45–50 240–270 28 2017 CTCRI 2017
PDP-CMR1 Clonal Selection from CIAT hybrid, CR43-7 (C33XCM4574-7) High yield, resistance to cassava mosaic disease caused by SLCMV & ICMV, drought tolerance 45–50 270–300 26 2017 CTCRI 2017
Sree Sakthi Clonal Selection from CIAT hybrid, CR43-2
High yield, resistance to cassava mosaic disease caused by SLCMV& ICMV, high starch 45–50 270–300 29–32 2018 CTCRI 2019
Sree Suvarna Clonal Selection from CIAT hybrid, CR43-2
High yield, resistance to cassava mosaic disease caused by SLCMV & ICMV 38 210–240 25–26 2018 CTCRI 2019
Tapioca YTP-1 Selection from Thondamuthur Local High yield 50 270–300 25–27 2013 TNAU 2016
Vellayani Hraswa Clonal Selection High yield, early bulking 35 180 28 2006 Unpublished data

In 2006, an exotic accession, MNga1 with CMD resistance, was released by CTCRI as Sree Padmanabha in Tamil Nadu. Over the years, several sources of resistance for CMD have been evaluated, including interspecific backcross lines, inbred lines and introductions from CIAT-HQ. Recently, CIAT-introduced variety Sree Reksha (CR24-4) was released for cultivation in Kerala with higher resistance to CMD as well as tolerance to post-harvest deterioration. CR43-7, CMD resistance and drought tolerance variety, was released in Andhra Pradhesh as PDP CMR1. Several clones with CMD resistance, including 8S501-2, CR43-2 and Cr35-8, are in pre-release stage. Recently, a nutrient-efficient variety, Sree Pavithra was also released. Important advancements in the development of CMD-resistant hybrids with short duration and PPD-tolerant cassava genotypes have been made. Among the CMD-resistant hybrids produced from the 9S-75 × CI-273 cross, 16S-203 produced the highest tuber yield (7.81 kg plan–1) in the sixth month. For CMD resistance and good cooking quality 11S-30, 11S-7, 15S-57, 11S-53 and 11S-4 were also selected for their high yields (>40 t ha–1) (CTCRI 2017).


Indonesia is one of such few countries where cassava remains the principal food crop. Indonesia is the largest producer of cassava in Asia, producing 44 kg per capita per year or 37.3 kg above the regional average (Howeler et al. 2013). Breeding efforts, therefore, differ from those of other cassava-growing countries, and include non-bitter varieties (i.e., eating varieties) in addition to varieties for industrial use.

Cassava breeding methodologies used by the Indonesian Legumes and Tuber Crops Research Institute (ILETRI) are conventional; involving hybridization, single plant selection, single row selection, single plot selection, preliminary and advanced yield trials, and multi-location trials. In the last few years, the breeding program has incorporated mutation breeding aimed at delivering varieties with high root yield, harvest index and root starch content, non-branching growth habit, good root shape, and tolerance to major pests and diseases [i.e., red mites (Oligonychus biharensis), mealybugs (Phenacoccus manihoti) and root rot (Fusarium sp.)]. In addition, eating varieties are also bred for low cyanogenic potential, good flesh texture, yellow flesh and harvestability.

From 1978–2016, 12 cassava varieties were released (Table 6), including Adira 1, a yellowish cassava for its β-carotene content (Priadi et al. 2009) with moderate resistant to root rot and Adira 4 is resistance to both root rot and red mite (Sholihin 2011, 2017). In terms of yield potential to ethanol, Litbang UK2 ranked the highest with the yield production of 14,472 litre ha–1 which is 20% and 33% higher than Adira 4 and UJ5, respectively (Sholihin et al. 2011, Sholihin 2017).

Table 6. Varieties developed and released in Indonesia since 1978 and their agronomic performance
Variety Traits Mean yield (t ha–1)* Starch content (%) Year of release References
Adira 1 Not bitter 22 16–18 1978 Balitkabi 2016, Sholihin 2006
Adira 2 Bitter 22 n.a. 1978 Balitkabi 2016
Adira 4 Bitter 35 18.5–20.9 1987 Balitkabi 2016, Sholihin 2006, 2011
Malang 1 Not bitter 36.5 >20.9 1992 Balitkabi 2016
Malang 2 Not bitter 31.5 n.a 1992 Balitkabi 2016
Darul Hidayah Not bitter n.a. <16 1998 Sholihin 2014
UJ3 Bitter n.a. 20.9 2000 Balitkabi 2016, Sholihin et al. 2015
UJ5 Bitter n.a. 20.5 2000 Balitkabi 2016, Sholihin et al. 2011, 2015
Malang 4 Bitter 39.7 18.5–20.9 2001 Balitkabi 2016, Sholihin 2014
Malang 6 Bitter 36.4 18.5–20.9 2001 Balitkabi 2016, Sholihin 2014
Litbang UK2 Not bitter 42.2 18.5–20.9 2012 Balitkabi 2016, Sholihin et al. 2011
UK1 Agritan Not bitter 30.2 19.9 2016 Balitkabi 2016

* Mean values taken from multi-location trails before varietal release.


Since 1982, CIAT developed 40,809 hybrid seeds, which were evaluated in the Philippines and the selected elite material was used for further breeding and varietal release (Mariscal et al. 2001). Later, in the 1990s, the Thai-CIAT cassava program collaborated with Philippine Root Crop Research and Training Center (PhilRootcrops) to meet the breeding objectives for cultivating cassava in diverse agro-climatic conditions with high yield, dry matter and starch content, early harvestability, resistance to pests and diseases, and the demands of the processing industries (i.e., starch and alcohol). Since 1982, 48 high-yielding National Seed Industry Council (NSIC)-registered cassava varieties have been released (Mariscal et al. 2001) by PhilRootcrops and local universities.

Cambodia and Laos

Both Cambodia and Lao PDR do not have a cassava breeding program. Most of the cassava varieties grown in this region are from Thailand, Vietnam and China. In Cambodia, farmers in the northwest mainly use varieties from Thailand (KU50/KM94, Huay Bong 60, Rayong 5, Rayong 72, Rayong 60/KM60, Rayong 9, Rayong 11) (Table 2) whereas in the northeast mainly use KM419, a variety from Vietnam (Table 3). These varieties have higher yields and starch contents than the two landraces, Damloung Kor and Damloung Mi.

Since 2004, the CIAT Cassava Program in Asia has been working with the National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute (NAFRI) to evaluate newly improved cassava varieties in Laos. Several varieties including Rayong 5, Rayong 11, Rayong 72 and KU50 from Thailand, SC205 from China, and KM98-1 and KM140 from Vietnam (Table 2) have outperformed local varieties and these varieties have been adopted by Lao farmers (Howeler et al. 2013). Depending on soil fertility, climate and management, the fresh root yields of these varieties range from 12 to 47 t ha–1.

History of cassava agronomy practices in Asia

Cassava yields vary in Asia. Average yields are ~21.5 t ha–1 (FAO 2018), with the potential to increase a 2–3 fold with minimal fertilizer inputs and improved management practices (Howeler and Tan 2001). Cassava production varies between sites because of the poor soil fertility, suboptimal weed management and the lack of use of improved varieties. Furthermore, a belief has it that cassava production contributes to soil degradation followed by nutrient depletion and soil erosion. However, research on cassava management has identified that the nutritional requirements (with the exception to potassium) of cassava per unit of dry matter yield are much lower than most crops (Howeler 1991). Cassava is a very efficient user of soil nutrients, thus, the continuous cultivation of cassava without application of appropriate fertilizers depletes the soil nutrients. The slow growing cassava canopy and low planting densities contributes to soil erosion, which not only impacts soil physical properties but also depletes the soil nutrients in topsoil. Thus, CIAT’s cassava agronomy research has focused on narrowing the yield gap and maximizing profits while maintaining soil fertility, which has been made possible with the commitment of the Nippon Foundation (Howeler and Aye 2014).

To maintain healthy soil fertility for cassava production, CIAT has ongoing research collaborations with its national partners in Asia and Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR). Long- and short-term experiments have shown that the response of cassava to NPK fertilizer application varies depending on soil type and fertility status. In general, NPK application had little effect on P levels in fertile soils on cassava root yield. However, without fertilizer application, cassava yields declined over time, which was mainly due to K deficiency. Furthermore, application of biofertilizers (green manure, compost or plant residues) along with chemical fertilizer increased yields (Howeler and Tan 2001, Howeler and Aye 2014).

In short, cassava agronomy research is focused on fertility management and maintenance of erosion control, planting time and harvest to reduce yield gap. In the following sections, we outline the priorities of agronomy research and achievements based on each country.


Improving and maintaining soil fertility with precise fertilizer management along with identifying the optimum conditions for cassava planting in each area is the main focus of agronomic research in Thailand. Therefore, cassava physiology and morphology are studied together with molecular aspects to identify the factors affecting the environmental responses of cassava. The cassava growth model was developed using knowledge and sources made available by the Integrated Breeding Platform (IBP: (Shrestha et al. 2012).

Irrigation is becoming a key factor for good agricultural practices to increase cassava yields in Thailand. An ongoing study demonstrated that surface or subsurface irrigation increased cassava root yield, for example, drip irrigation increased root yields up to 67.5 t ha–1 in use of line CMR43-08-89 which is 1.3-fold fresher root yield than the popular cultivar HB60 grown in a plot experiment. However, not all cassava cultivars are adapted to irrigated conditions since line CMR43-08-89 did not show improvement in starch content, whereas HB60 produced more starch content (30.2%) than CMR43-08-89 (18.7%) (Kittipadakul et al. 2014).


In general, cassava agronomy practices highly varies based on the regions of Vietnam, topography and financial resources of the growers. Farmers cultivating cassava on sloppy or marginal land generally belongs to low-income group and often provide little to no input for the fertilizers, plant material or irrigation (Kim et al. 2015). Better-off farmers often come with better land and provide significantly more inputs. The top-tier cassava producers are usually rich, well equipped and have large area covering up to hundreds of hectares. These farmers are mostly in Tay Ninh province, the capital of cassava production where the average yield is highest (~30 t/ha) and starch processing plants are most concentrated (over 60 factories). This is the only place where mechanization and irrigation application are the norm. However, appropriate fertilizer application is still one of the major research foci in Vietnam.

Agronomy research in Vietnam has been focused on soil fertility maintenance; response to fertilizer application; intercropping and soil conservation. Numerous long- and short-term experiments have shown that continuous cultivation of monocropped cassava yielded as low as 3 t ha–1 without fertilizer application but increased up to 20 t ha–1 with balanced fertilizer (2:1:2 NPK) application (Nguyen et al. 2001). Experiments on soil fertility maintenance demonstrated that most soils used for long-term cassava planting are degraded. For example, cassava cropping lowered pH and total N, P and exchangeable K contents (Nguyen 1998). Intercropping and crop rotation with maize, peanut, mung bean and black bean improved soil fertility and increased farm income (Nguyen et al. 2001). Furthermore, erosion control experiments indicated that intercropping and contour planting can be effective. No- or minimum tillage was also effective for erosion control.


Cassava agronomy research in China initially focused on soil fertility maintenance and erosion control. Nitrogen application on crop establishment had the greatest impact on root yield, with potassium and, in some cases, phosphorus is also very important (Howeler and Aye 2014). A soil erosion control experiment demonstrated that contour ridging, intercropping with peanut or planting with vetiver grass (Chrysopogon zizanioides) reduced erosion when cassava was grown on sloping land (Jun et al. 2001). Since the 1990s, depending on the interests and capacity of cassava farmers, some farmers have intercropped cassava with other crops, thereby making full use of their land and increasing the economic benefit per unit of land (Lu et al. 2011). In recent years, intercropping of cassava has spread rapidly and is classified into four major models: 1) intercropping with long-duration crops (rubber, betel nut, and fruit trees) at the seedling stage; 2) intercropping with short-duration crops (watermelon, pumpkin, cantaloupe, corn, soybean, peanut, peppers); 3) intercropping with the traditional Chinese medicinal herbs (Mesona chinensis and Andrographis paniculata (Burm. f.) Nees; and 4) intercropping with edible mushrooms (straw or oyster mushrooms). It is estimated that intercropping accounts for more than 50% of the total cultivated area of cassava in southern regions of China. For intercropping, farmers have improved water and fertilizer management, which not only increases the yield of intercrop fillers but also fresh cassava yields. Of the above intercropping models, fresh cassava yields per unit area have increased from 7.8 to 25.2% when intercropped with watermelon, pumpkin, muskmelon or chieh-qua, and 6.1 to 17.4% when intercropped with peanut or soybean, relative to monocropping cassava (Chen et al. 2017b, Lu et al. 2011). The ranking for the intercropping crops for increasing fresh cassava yield was muskmelon > pumpkin > soybean > watermelon > chieh-qua > peanut (Lu et al. 2011).


Cassava production in Indonesia mostly occurs in upland areas that are low in soil nutrients (Sholihin 2006) and susceptible to soil erosion. Furthermore, cassava is grown by smallholder farmers with limited resources. Yields in monocropped cassava without fertilizer application over eight years declined from 25 to 5 t ha–1 (Wargiono et al. 2001). Thus, cassava agronomy activities have focused on soil fertility and cassava productivity. Fertilizer application to improve soil fertility and cassava productivity depend on the variety as well as the soil’s physical and chemical characteristics (Sholihin 2009, Taufiq et al. 2009, 2012). Results from various soil types and varieties in response to fertilizer application indicated that N and K application could improve cassava productivity by up to 92% in low K soil (Suyamto 1998, Taufiq et al. 2012, Wargiono 2003). Furthermore, the application of organic matter and farmyard manure increased cassava productivity by improving soil physical conditions (bulk density, infiltration rate, etc.) (Sholihin et al. 2010, 2011). Thus, it is recommended that inorganic fertilizer is applied in combination with organic fertilizer to improve cassava production.

The control of soil erosion has also been a focus of agronomy research in Indonesia. Successive cassava cropping and land preparation are two major contributors to soil erosion. Preparing land with minimum tillage to reduce soil erosion had no significant effect on cassava yield (Wargiono et al. 2001). Intercropping can also reduce soil erosion, for example, intercropping cassava with maize, rice or peanut with adequate fertilizer reduced soil erosion for up to 20% compared with monocropped cassava (Wargiono et al. 2001). Planting contour hedgerows with leguminous trees (e.g., Gliricidia sepium, Leucaena leucocephala) is also a recommended practice for controlling soil erosion.


In the Philippines, cassava research has focused mainly on maintaining soil fertility and soil conservation practices in collaboration with the CIAT-Asia cassava program. Cassava production in the Philippines increased 1.5 fold from 7.8 t ha–1 to 11.7 t ha–1 over the period of 2003 to 2014 (FAO 2018). While this is encouraging, the national yield remains far below compared to most of the other Asian countries. For example, yields in Thailand, India and Vietnam are currently at 21.8, 34.9 and 18 t ha–1, respectively (FAO 2018). The scarcity of high-yielding varieties and infestation of pests and diseases are the major contributing factors to the lower yields of cassava in the Philippines, but the primary determinant of low yields is due to inadequate crop management practices (fertilizer application and soil fertility management).

Over the years, agronomic research in the Philippines demonstrated that minimum tillage produces better yields than zero tillage. Planting on ridges or mounds in an area susceptible to waterlogging is more preferable. Extensive experimentation has been carried out on the response of NPK at various application levels and combinations at different time period (at planting or 2–3 months after planting) together with the comparisons between organic and inorganic fertilizers (Evangelio 2001). Since most of the cassava are cultivated in the marginal fertile soils, the fertilizer application based on the soil analysis recommendations has produced best results (Villamayor and Destriza 1986). Application of green and animal manures have also increased yields and grass mulching effectively reduced the soil erosion (Evangelio 2001).


Agronomy research in India has made tremendous progress over the past years. Extensive research on nutritional requirements, planting methods, cropping systems and long-term fertilizer trials has been undertaken (George et al. 2001). In India, cassava grows in both rainfed and irrigated systems, in which irrigated systems can produce up to 90% more yield than rainfed systems provided with a high dose of NPK (George et al. 2001). Furthermore, irrigated cassava can be planted at any time of the year, whereas April and May are the optimum period for growing cassava in rainfed conditions (Nayar et al. 1985).

Cropping system research demonstrated that short-duration (7 months) cassava could fit into rice-based cropping systems. Intercropping cassava with legumes [ground nuts (Arachis hypogaea) and cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata)] are more remunerative as in situ green manure reduces the N requirement by 50% (George et al. 2001). Furthermore, the use of chemical fertilizer for successive cropping cycles decreased Ca, Mg, Zn and Cu in the soil and lowered pH. Thus, organic manure application to the soil is recommended along with inorganic fertilizer (George et al. 2001).

Cambodia and Laos

In Cambodia, cassava is grown mainly by smallholder farmers with the average land size of 4 ha, but mostly for export as fresh roots and household consumption. Cultivated areas rapidly expanded from13,000 to 387,636 ha and yield increased from 5.4 t ha–1 to 26.3 t ha–1 over the period of 1996 to 2016 (FAO 2018), concerning for soil fertility, as fertilizer applications by farmers are not common (Howeler and Aye 2014, Montgomery et al. 2017). The recent pest and disease outbreaks also have become a major constraint for cassava production (Graziosi et al. 2016, Srean 2016).

The collaboration between CIAT and the Agriculture Research and Development Institute (CARDI) has demonstrated ongoing research on fertilizer application and improved variety selection. Along with the emerging threat of pests and diseases (e.g., CMD and CWBD), the major yield constraints for cassava were soil nutrient deficits, short crop duration and weed competition (Sopheap et al. 2012). Farmers commonly grow cassava continuously on the same field without intercropping with other crops or applying organic or inorganic fertilizers (Wenjun et al. 2016).

In Lao PDR, farmers adaptation to improved cassava varieties has increased the cultivation areas and yields from 5,100 ha to 94,726 ha and 13.7 t ha–1 to 32.7 t ha–1 over the period of 1996 to 2016, respectively (FAO 2018). The considerable opportunities to improve the production and profitability has moved cassava to a ‘cash’ crop for smallholder farmers. However, fertilizer application rates among farmers are still very low.

The Agricultural Research Center (ARC) and National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute (NAFRI) are in collaboration with CIAT on cassava agronomy. The importance of weed management (Khanthavong et al. 2016) and the positive effects of stake priming (soaking stakes in nutrient solution) on germination and early growth of cassava have been reported (Khanthavong et al. 2014). Pests and diseases have also become a major constraint for cassava production in Laos and a recent survey reported the presence of mealybugs (Phenacoccus sp.) – pink mealybug (P. manihoti) and green mealybug (P. madeirensis) – whiteflies (Bemisia tabaci), red mites (Tetranychus truncatus) and Cassava Witches Broom Disease (CWBD).

Research initiatives to accelerate cassava breeding in Asia

High-density DNA screening and large-scale genome sequencing technologies (Bumgarner 2013, Muir et al. 2016) have greatly increased the discovery of single base variation, which can be associated with the change in traits. Recently, initiatives to complete the cassava genetic map have resulted in the incorporation of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and next-generation sequencing SNPs in a consensus linkage map using the K family (Soto et al. 2015) and consensus 2412-cM map using 22,403 SNP markers, integrating ten biparental maps (ICGMC 2014). This multiple biparental consensus map enabled to anchor 71.9% of the draft genome assembly and 90.7% of the predicted protein-coding genes. Thus, the chromosome-anchored genome sequences will assist in the rapid identification of markers linked to important traits for cassava breeding (ICGMC 2014).

AFLPs and SSR markers have been used on cassava genetic diversity studies and exploitation of gene sequence variation for important traits, such as CMD (Akano et al. 2002) and CBB (Fregene et al. 2003, López et al. 2007, Vásquez and López 2014). These molecular marker technologies have been largely superseded with the rapid identification of a large number of SNP variants through next-generation sequencing (Rabbi et al. 2015, Soto et al. 2015) and subsequent release of the first draft of the cassava genome (Prochnik et al. 2012, UANews 2009, Wang et al. 2014). The recent application of SNPs derived from genotyping by sequence (GBS) identified major quantitative trait loci (QTL) for resistance to cassava brown streak disease (CBSD) developed from a F1 cross between a breeding line and an African landrace, Kiroba, identified to CBSD tolerant by breeders (Nzuki et al. 2017), revealing that some of the QTLs associated with CBSD in Kiroba differ from those previously reported and could be a new source of tolerance. In addition to QTL identifications for acceleration of breeding objectives (Ceballos et al. 2015), another important application of markers is to verify the integrity of varieties managed by breeders, seed producers and farmers. A Fluidigm Dynamic Array™ 180 SNP-array (cassava SNPY-array) was recently developed by the CIAT cassava program and used in several studies to identify: 1) landraces and improved cultigens in farmers’ fields; 2) duplicates in CIAT’s germplasm collection (previously done using SSRs); 3) genetic diversity analysis of germplasm from the littoral and Amazonian regions of Colombia (Floro et al. 2017, Peña-Venegas et al. 2014). This array has also been tested among farmer-grown varieties released in Vietnam to measure the impact of cassava breeding as described above (Le et al. 2019).

Although significant progress in cassava genetics has been made through conventional and marker-assisted breeding (Ceballos et al. 2015), new regional challenges and the effect of impending climate change (Ghini et al. 2011), on pest and disease outbreaks such as SLCMV (Minato et al. 2019), presents additional challenges to the breeders. From an industrial viewpoint, development of value-added cassava with improved starch quality and new starch type (Bechoff et al. 2018) are always in high demand. The recent emergence of genome-editing technologies such as CRISPR/Cas9 system has been a great milestone (Hummel et al. 2018, Odipio et al. 2017) in crop genetic improvement such as disease resistance (Gomez et al. 2018). Bull et al. (2018) demonstrated that mutagenesis of two genes, PROTEIN TARGETING TO STARCH (PTST1) and GRANULE BOUND STARCH SYNTHASE (GBSS), involved in amylose biosynthesis could reduce or eliminate amylose content in root starch. Interestingly, most of the ptst lines produced starch with an average of 13.3% amylose compared to 18.5% in the wild type. Unlike some of the gbss mutant lines, none of the ptst lines produced amylose-free (waxy) starch. This indicates that genome-editing technology can identify interesting lines containing a spectrum of different amylose contents for the cassava starch industry and provide new insights into the role of these genes in cassava starch biosynthesis.

Cassava encodes five eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) isoforms, including the novel cap-binding protein-1 (nCBP-1) that interacts with cassava brown streak virus genome-linked protein (Vpg) to cause CBSD in Africa. Generations of ncbp-1, ncbp-2, and ncbp-1/ncbp-2 cassava mutants by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing demonstrated reduced severity against CBSD and incidence of storage root necrosis, as well as delayed and diminished aerial symptoms (Gomez et al. 2018). Thus, CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing is advantageous in simultaneously targeting multiple genes relative to earlier genetic engineering techniques such as RNA interference (RNAi) (Blow 2008).

To accelerate cassava breeding in Asia through the application of new breeding technologies (Germini et al. 2018), the International Laboratory for Cassava Molecular Breeding (ILCMB) was established in 2012 between a collaborative framework of AGI under the Vietnamese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (VAAS) in Hanoi, Vietnam and CIAT with RIKEN. At ILCMB, efforts to establish genome-editing technologies in farmer-preferred varieties are underway. The application of this technology in cassava has indicated the importance of establishing a sustainable induction system of friable embryogenic callus (FEC) in the preferred varieties including KU50 (Utsumi et al. 2017), even though regeneration of whole cassava plants from transformed FEC was already reported in the mid-1990’s (Li et al. 1996). Recently, an in planta genome-editing procedure was established for wheat cultivars using shoot apical meristems (SAMs) that are target cells for biolistic delivery (Hamada et al. 2018). This methodology could be an alternative for developing genome-edited crops such as cassava, which are not easy to transform by conventional procedures.

Crop phenotyping through disruptive technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT) and artificial intelligence (AI) have rapidly progressed (Araus et al. 2018, Tattaris et al. 2016). The recent developments in deep learning technologies of AI, together with high-performance computing have been successfully applied in different research fields to extract meaningful features from the collected digital data (Ghosala et al. 2018, Liakos et al. 2018). A novel tool for cassava disease detection was reported using deep learning models to identify three diseases and two types of pest damage, with an overall accuracy of 93% for non-trained data, making plant disease detection robust, cost-effective and scalable (Ramacharan et al. 2017).

CIAT’s phenomics platform is being established to facilitate trait identification and its validation for breeding and agronomy research by integrating ground truth and remote sensing data. Fig. 1 shows the platform integrating ground truth and remote sensing data sets captured by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) and satellite imaging technologies using freely available, medium-resolution satellite imagery (e.g., Sentinel 2) with which the land cover and crop health status are assessed on a large scale (data not published).

Fig. 1.

Schematic diagram of data-driven cassava development. Aerial part of cassava plants monitored and phenotyped for traits of interest by UAV and satellite imagery under field conditions. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) used for belowground traits. Analyzed digital data used by breeders to identify new source of genes in germplasm or select better performing breeding lines in a cassava breeding scheme. In coming years, application of disrupting technologies such as AI with collected data in farmer’s field realized to improve crop productivity and sustainability.

Apart from aboveground monitoring, technologies are also available to predict storage root growth and development. One such novel method currently being explored by CIAT, in collaboration with Texas A&M University, is the use of ground-penetrating radar (GPR) to predict cassava root biomass. Preliminary work has demonstrated that GPR can explicate root and tuber characteristics such as early bulking and volumetric dimensions (Delgado et al. 2017), which will be very useful for selecting early maturing cassava cultivars in breeding program. Thus, disruptive technologies such as sensors, UAV, satellites and AI will have a huge impact on agricultural research to identify the best-performing lines in early breeding cycles of large breeding populations (King 2017, Liakos et al. 2018).

Regionally coordinated research and development in Asia

The coordinated efforts of CIAT with the national program in Asia has increased cassava productivity from 13.0 t ha–1 in 1996 to 21.3 t ha–1 in 2016 through the adoption of improved varieties (Labarta et al. 2017) and better agronomic practices (FAO 2018). To further strengthen regional cooperation and coordinated research activities in cassava breeding, the Asia Cassava Breeders Network (ACB-Net: was established in 2015. This group aims to bring together conventional breeding programs and molecular breeding laboratories, and forge public-private partnerships in variety development and evaluation. The CGIAR research program on Roots, Tubers and Bananas (RTB) is a protagonist in the regional cooperation on cassava improvement. Research activities for short-duration crops such as potato, sweet potato and yam have the potential to incorporate cassava production systems to improve farmer’s income in Asia.

In Asia, cassava seed (stem cuttings) systems distribution generally involves farmer to farmer channel and in many cases, seed can travel several hundred kilometres, crossing country borders. This informal distribution of the seed system is a major cause for the spread of cassava diseases like SLCMV and CWBD (Graziosi et al. 2016), threatening its productivity. SLCMV was first reported in a province of Cambodia in 2016 (Wang et al. 2016), but now been reported in four other provinces of Cambodia and one province in Vietnam (Uke et al. 2018). Thus, regionally coordinated research on seed systems, pest and disease control, and capacity-building efforts should be launched to ensure the profitability and sustainability of cassava production systems in Asia (Graziosi et al. 2016). Towards archiving the regional goals, the Global Cassava Partnership for the 21st Century (GCP21), a not-for-profit international alliance of 45 organizations, organized a stakeholder meeting in September 2018 to design a plan of action to prevent the spread of cassava mosaic disease in Southeast Asia.


Cassava research and development has been successful in Asia in the past half-century. Breeding high-yielding varieties with improved agronomic practices mobilized strong partnerships with numerous stakeholders. Breeding programs with industry targeted commercial traits foster sub-sector development. Different breeding technologies employing traditional and modern techniques such as marker development, genome editing contributed to the development of new varieties.

Agronomic research initially focused on the introduction of diverse germplasm to the region and later reached milestones with improved agronomical practices focusing on yield attributes and crop management practices such as fertilizer inputs, weed management, sowing methods and soil erosion control. In the coming years, application of disrupting technologies such as IoT and AI combined with multi-sensors (Ferrández-Pastor et al. 2016, Jayaraman et al. 2016, Tzounis et al. 2017), will allow farmers and vital players in agricultural field to retrieve crop variable and productivity leading to sustainable development of cassava production.

Author Contribution Statement

Al Imran Malik and Manabu Ishitani designed the structure of the review and compile the draft and co-lead the project. Individual country sections were drafted as follows, Thailand: Pasajee Kongsil, Piya Kittipadakul Pornsak Aiemnaka and Suwaluk Amawan; Vietnam: Vũ Anh Nguyễn, Hữu Hỷ Nguyễn Trọng Hiển Nguyễn, Hai Anh Nguyễn, Văn Đồng Nguyễn and Lê Huy Hàm; China: Wenjun Ou, Cheng Lu, Songbi Chen andWenquan Wang; Indonesia: Sholihin; Cambodia: Pao Srean and Sophearith Sok; India: MN Sheela; Laos: Laothao Youbee. Furthermore, Luis Augusto Becerra López-Lavalle contributed to the molecular breeding section, Yoshinori Utsumi, Motoaki Seki and Hiroki Tokunaga contributed to new breeding technique section. Hernan Ceballos contributed to the breeding section, Michael Selvaraj Gomez contributed the digital agriculture section, and Ricardo Labarta contributed to the sections on varietal dissemination.


We express our gratitude to everyone who has contributed to cassava development in Asia. We thank Drs. Clair Hershey and Kazuo Kawano for critiquing an earlier version of the manuscript and provide useful comments and suggestions to improve the manuscript. We also thank Ms. Angela Fernando for critical reading of this manuscript. The research presented in this review was supported by national and international donors and agencies including Nippon Foundation, CGIAR Research Program on Roots, Tubers and Banana (RTB), Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR), Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) of Japan, Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) through the Science and Technology Research Partnership for Sustainable Development (SATREPS) program, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), and United States National Science Foundation (NSF).

Literature Cited