Identification of resistance to Fusarium head blight and molecular cytogenetics of interspecific derivatives between wheat and Psathyrostachys huashanica

Abstract

Psathyrostachys huashanica is a relative of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) with many disease resistance genes that can be used to improve wheat disease resistance. In order to enrich the germplasm resources available in wheat genetics and breeding, we assessed Fusarium head blight (FHB) resistance in 45 interspecific derivatives between wheat and Psathyrostachys huashanica during two years from 2017–2018. Two interspecific derivatives comprising, H-34-8-2-6-1 and H-24-3-1-5-19-1 were identified as FHB resistant lines. These two lines were examined based on their morphology and cytogenetics, as well as by genomic in situ hybridization (GISH), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), molecular markers, and 660K genotyping array to determine their genetic construction. The results confirmed H-34-8-2-6-1 as a wheat–P. huashanica 1Ns long arm ditelosomic addition line and H-24-3-1-5-19-1 as a wheat–P. huashanica 2Ns substitution line. Assessments of the agronomic traits showed that H-34-8-2-6 had significantly higher kernel number per spike and self-fertility rate than parent 7182. In addition, compared with 7182, H-24-3-1-5-19-1 had a much lower plant height while the other agronomic traits were relatively similar. The two new lines are valuable germplasm materials for breeding FHB resistance in wheat.

Introduction

Fusarium head blight (FHB), also known as scab, pink mold, and whiteheads, is caused by Fusarium graminearum that affects wheat heads, and occurs widely in humid and semi-humid regions throughout the World (Abaya et al. 2021, Goswami and Kistler 2004, Osborne and Stein 2007). Due to global warming and wheat planting structure changing, FHB has became a world-wide disease in wheat and it has caused severe losses in the United States, Canada, Europe, and South America (McMullen et al. 1997, Tan et al. 2004). In China, FHB mainly affects the winter wheat producing regions located in the middle-lower reaches of the Yangtze River and South China, and the spring wheat producing regions of Northeast China (Lu et al. 2008). In recent years, the severity of FHB has increased in the wheat producing regions located in the Huang Huai River, and Northwest China. FHB causes significant reductions in the wheat yield as well as decreasing the starch and protein contents of wheat kernels. Most importantly, the blighted wheat kernels contain deoxynivalenol secreted by Fusarium, which detrimentally affects the health of humans and animals (Desjardins and Hohn 1997, Duveiller et al. 2008, Gunupuru et al. 2017, Krska 2009). Chemical and biological control methods are effective against FHB, but threaten both environmental safety and food safety. Therefore, breeding FHB resistance in wheat is a fundamental approach for controlling FHB and also one of the important goals in wheat breeding.

Many studies have investigated FHB, but there is a lack of FHB-resistant varieties of wheat scab in China and abroad (Chang et al. 2015). The only major FHB resistance sources at present are Sumai 3 and Wangshuibai, and their closely related derived lines. The main previously identified resistance genes are Fhb1 (Cuthbert et al. 2006) and Fhb2 (Cuthbert et al. 2007) in Sumai 3, and Fhb4 (Xue et al. 2010) and Fhb5 (Xue et al. 2011) in Wangshuibai. However, these resistant sources generally exhibit poor performance in terms of their yield, baking quality, and adaptability (Bai and Shaner 2004). Compared to Sumai 3 and Wangshuibai, using FHB resistance from wheat-alien lines is a challenge. The identification of three major resistant genes comprising, Fhb3 in Leymus racemosus (Qi et al. 2008), Fhb6 in Elymus (Cainong et al. 2015), and Fhb7 in Elytrigia elongata (Guo et al. 2015), motivated the search for FHB resistance in close relatives of wheat. Thus, the identification and exploitation of FHB resistance genes in close relatives of wheat may facilitate breeding new FHB-resistant varieties of wheat.

In recent years, many genera that are closely related to wheat have been shown to possess FHB resistance, and the introduction of FHB resistance genes into wheat has been investigated by distant hybridization and studies of the resultant interspecific derivatives. For example, the FHB-resistant ditelosomic substitution line 7Lr#1S(7A) were bred by introducing the Chromosome 7Lr#1S of Leymus racemosus into common wheat (Wang and Chen 2008). A wheat-Thinopyrum elongatum 7E chromosome FHB-resistant disomic addition line was constructed by introducing the diploid Thinopyrum elongatum 7E chromosome into the wheat background which showed high resistance to FHB (Liu et al. 2017a). The new wheat varieties comprising Xinong 509, Xinong 511, and Xinong 529 derived from the common wheat–decaploid Elytrigia elongata line have been shown to exhibit good FHB resistances in the field (Liu et al. 2017b). In addition, a wheat–Leymus racemosus translocation line T6DL·7LrS provided a new germplasm for genetic improvement of wheat scab (Zhang and Wang 2018).

Psathyrostachys huashanica is closely related to wheat and it possesses many genes for beneficial traits that can improve wheat germplasm, such as resistance to drought, chilling and freezing, high salinity and high alkalinity, as well as resistance to diseases including wheat stripe rust, leaf rust, powdery mildew, and FHB (Chen et al. 1991, Zhao et al. 2010). Moreover, it can be crossed with wheat to transfer resistance genes, thereby allowing breeders to successfully introduce beneficial genes from P. huashanica into common wheat to improve its disease resistance (Chen et al. 1991, Kang et al. 2011). For example, the wheat–P. huashanica 1Ns disomic addition line H5-5-4-2 had immunity to powdery mildew at the seedling and adult stages (Han et al. 2020). In addition, the wheat–P. huashanica 2Ns, 3Ns, 4Ns, and 5Ns addition lines are highly resistant to wheat stripe rust, while the wheat–P. huashanica 1Ns and 7Ns addition lines are highly resistant to brown leaf rust, and the 2D(2Ns) substitution line 16-6 is highly resistant to wheat stripe rust (Du et al. 2013a, 2013b, 2014a, 2014b, 2014c, 2014d, 2015). However, there have been no previous reports of FHB resistance in the interspecific derivatives between wheat and P. huashanica.

Materials and Methods

Materials

The materials comprised P. huashanica (2n = 2x = 14, NsNs), wheat 7182 (2n = 6x = 42, AABBDD), and 45 interspecific derivatives between wheat and P. huashanica which are generated by taking 7182 as a female parent and P. huashanica as a male parent for hybridization, backcrossing with 7182 for one generation, and finally selfing for nine generations. The parental wheat 7182 were used as controls for assessing FHB resistance. These materials were developed and maintained by the Provincial Key Breeding Lab of Shaanxi. The FHB inoculum was provided by Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University (NWSUAF) College of Plant Protection.

FHB resistance assessment of phenotyping

The 45 interspecific derivatives between wheat and P. huashanica were planted at Guancun Farm of NWSUAF in 2017 and 2018. The lines were manually inoculated with F. graminearum in the wheat blooming stage by glume cutting and drip inoculation. The inoculated FHB strain was rotationally cultured in a triangular flask containing 4% Mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) solution at 25°C for 2 days. The inoculum was diluted with sterile water until about 20 conidia were counted by microscopy in a hemocytometer at 10× magnification. Next, two symmetrical spikelets on one randomly selected spike were inoculated with 10 μL of inoculation solution after cutting the glumes, and the spike was then bagged to maintain the humidity for two days. Five plants were inoculated in this manner for each line. At 21 days after inoculation, the FHB symptoms were classified according to the ‘Rulers for Resistance Evaluation of Wheat to Diseases and Insect Pests Part4: Rule for Resistance Evaluation of Wheat to Wheat Scab’ (NY/T1443.4-2007) (Institute of Plant Protection 2007) (Supplemental Table 1).

The resistance and susceptibility to FHB were defined in terms of the disease index according to the ‘FHB Reviewing Standards’ as follows: resistant with a disease index below 20, moderately resistant with a disease index ranging from 20–40, moderately susceptible with a disease index ranging from 40–80, and highly susceptible with a disease index ranging from 80–100.

Disease index = Σ (spike number with all resistance and susceptibility grades × number with corresponding resistance and susceptibility grades)/(total number of spikes surveyed × maximum resistance and susceptibility grade) × 100

Cytological observation

Seeds of the disease-resistant materials were spread on separate filter papers at the bottom of Petri dishes and soaked with water at room temperature for 24 h. The seeds were then arranged uniformly after removing the water and maintained in the Petri dishes until they were at the germination stage. The seeds were moved into a refrigerator and kept at 4°C for 24 h, before placing in dark until the roots grew to a length of 1–2 cm. The root tips were removed with tweezers and placed in ice water for 24 h; before fixing in Carnoy’s Fluid (glacial acetic acid:anhydrous ethanol = 1:3 v/v) for one week (Li et al. 2019). Then the root tips were placed in 2% cellulase plus 1% pectinase, hydrolyzed at 37°C for 1 h, ground, and centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 3 min. Finally, glacial acetic acid was added, before shaking and on a glass slide. Microsections were observed with an Olympus BX60 microscope to examine and count the numbers of chromosome structures, and images were acquired (Li et al. 2020c).

Genomic in situ hybridization (GISH)

Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) was used to extract genomic DNA from the materials, the genomic DNA from P. huashanica was labeled with DIG-Nick Translation Mix (Roche, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Clear microsections with multiple cell division phases were selected. To each of the microsections, 40 μL of hybridizing solution was added containing 4 μL probe DNA (at a concentration >1000 ng/μL), 1 μL DNA sodium salt from salmon testes (5 μg/μL), 4 μL 20× SSC (prepared from chloride sodium and trisodium citrate by mixing), 8 μL 50% (w/v) dextran sulfate, 20 μL formamide, and 1 μL 10% (w/v) sodium dodecyl sulfate, which were mixed, and ultrapure H₂O was added to the solution until the volume reached 40 μL. The hybridization signals in the microsections were visualized with anti-digoxigenin fluorescein isothiocyanate. The microsections were stained with PI and then mounted in anti-fade agent H-1300, before examining with an Olympus BX60 microscope and capturing images using a Photometrics SenSys CCD (Wu et al. 2006).

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)

Oligo-pSc119.2 (6-FAM-5ʹ) and Oligo-pTa535-1 (Tamra-5ʹ) as mixed probes were used to determine the chromosome constitution in H-24-3-1-5-19-1 (Li et al. 2020b). First, the glass slides were irradiated with 1250J light for 6min in UV Crosslinker. Second, 9 μL of mixed probe (pTa535-1:pSc119.2-2:H₂O = 3:2:4) was added to the slide, and hybridized for 4 hours or overnight in a dark and humid environment at 37°C. Third, the microsections were stained with DAPI and10 μL of staining solution (H1200: ddH2O = 15:5) was added after drying. Last, observed and took pictures under an Olympus BX60 microscope.

Expressed sequence tag-sequence tagged site (EST-STS) molecular marker analysis

Exogenous chromosomes were detected using 83 pairs of EST-STS primers (Han et al. 2020), which were evenly distributed on each chromosome in the seven wheat homologous groups. Whole genomic DNA was extracted with CTAB from 7182, H-34-8-2-6-1, H-24-3-1-5-19-1, and P. huashanica. After confirming the quality of the DNA by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, the concentration was adjusted to 50 ng/mL for use as a PCR template. The PCR mixture with a volume of 20 μL contained 2 μL 10× PCR buffer, 2 μL (2.5 μmol/mL) primers, 2 μL (50 μg/μL) DNA template, 1.6 μL dNTPs (2.5 μmol/mL), 1.6 μL MgCl₂ (2.5 mmol/mL), 0.1 μL (5 μmol/μL) Taq polymerase, and 10.7 μL deionized distilled water. The PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis on 8% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel (voltage = 160 V, current = 120 mA) for 2.5 h, before observing in an ultraviolet light box and capturing an image with an SLR camera.

Simple sequence repeat (SSR) molecular markers

222 pairs of SSR primers uniformly distributed on wheat chromosomes were used to determine the missing chromosomes in H-24-3-1-5-19-1 (Gupta et al. 2002, Pestsova et al. 2000, Röder et al. 1998, Zhang et al. 2008). The reaction system and PCR amplification procedure employed for analysis with the SSR markers were the same as those for the EST-STS markers, but the annealing temperatures differed for some primers. The remaining steps are the same as EST-STS.

660K genotyping array analyses

Whole genomic DNA was extracted using CTAB from H-24-3-1-5-19-1, 7182 and P. huashanica, and sent to Beijing CapitalBio Technology Co., Ltd. for analysis with Axiom 660K Genotyping Arrays. The heterozygous single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) ratio and the specific SNP ratio in H-24-3-1-5-19-1 were calculated in Office Excel 2010 to determine the homologous group belonging to foreign chromosomes in H-24-3-1-5-19-1 (Bai et al. 2020).

Agronomic traits of FHB-resistant materials

The agronomic traits of H-34-8-2-6-1, H-24-3-1-5-19-1 and 7182 were investigated after maturation. Ten plants from each of the interspecific derivatives and their parent common wheat 7182 were randomly selected to determine the plant height, spike length, tiller number per plant, spikelet and kernel numbers per spike, and kernel setting percentage per spike. The average data based on ten samples and two consecutive two-year repetitions were collected to ensure accurate results. Significant differences in these traits were determined with SPSS Statistics 20.

Results

Resistance to FHB

The disease grades and indexes for the 45 interspecific derivatives between wheat 7182 and P. huashanica were obtained in 2017–2018 (Table 1). Two of the 45 derived materials, H-34-8-2-6-1 and H-24-3-1-5-19-1, were moderately resistant to FHB (Fig. 1). The others were moderately susceptible to FHB, and the disease indexes for 7182 were 68 and 76 in 2017 and 2018, respectively, and thus it was moderately susceptible. The results suggested that moderate susceptibility was due to 7182, whereas the moderately resistant lines probably carried chromatin derived from P. huashanica.

Table 1. Disease indexes and assessments of resistance and susceptibility for the 45 interspecific derivatives between wheat and P. huashanica and their parent common wheat 7182

Materials	2017		2018		Materials	2017		2018
	Disease index	Judged resistances or susceptibilities evaluation	Disease index	Judged resistances or susceptibilities		Disease index	Judged resistances and susceptibilities	Disease index	Judged resistances or susceptibilities
H-34-8-2-6-1	32	MR	36	MR	H-3-5-9-3-1	78	MS	76	MS
H-210-1-1	68	MS	76	MS	H-3-7-4-2-1	58	MS	52	MS
H-1-8-1-1-2	84	HS	76	MS	H-17-7-1-1-1	56	MS	64	MS
H-3-1-1-1	46	MS	56	MS	H-30-2-3-1-1	64	MS	68	MS
H-5-9-1	52	MS	78	MS	H-2-7-8-7-7-2	72	MS	78	MS
H-8-12-2	54	MS	64	MS	H-3-3-6-3-7	46	MS	52	MS
H-9-46-1	86	HS	84	HS	H-3-5-6-3-1-9	52	MS	72	MS
H-13-4-1	96	HS	86	HS	H-17-7-1-1-8-2	62	MS	68	MS
H-19-1-1	82	HS	88	HS	H-18-1-3-1-6-4	68	MS	74	MS
H-42-3-1	48	MS	56	MS	H-20-5-1-1-3-2	74	MS	72	MS
H-20-1-1	54	MS	66	MS	H-24-4-4-1-1-3	86	HS	84	HS
H-58-1-2-1	58	MS	72	MS	H-30-4-4-1-6-4	58	MS	48	MS
H-21-10-2-2	66	MS	66	MS	H-99-1-1-2-1	72	MS	88	HS
H-45-14-1-1	64	MS	68	MS	H-48-3-2-1-7-2	64	MS	68	MS
H-37-2-1	68	MS	72	MS	H-24-3-1-6-14-3	88	HS	86	HS
H-49-4-1	86	MS	94	MS	H-48-8-2-1-1	56	MS	72	MS
H-62-1-1-1	62	MS	56	MS	H-48-8-2-1-9	68	MS	66	MS
H-19-1-1-1	78	MS	84	HS	H-3-2-1-3-5	66	MS	62	MS
H-26-1-1-1	82	HS	86	HS	H-3-2-1-3-12	92	HS	84	HS
H-24-3-1-5-19-1	38	MR	36	MR	H-3-2-2-1-1	62	MS	68	MS
H-1-11-5-1-1	82	HS	88	HS	H-3-2-3-5-1	58	MS	70	MS
H-2-4-18-7-1	48	MS	50	MS	H-3-7-4-2-2	52	MS	64	MS
H-2-4-18-7-10	56	MS	60	MS	7182	68	MS	76	MS

Fig. 1.

Fusarium head blight incidence in spikes. (A) H-34-8-2-6-1, (B) H-24-3-1-5-19-1, and (C) wheat 7182.

Cytological examination and GISH analysis of interspecific derivatives

The root tip chromosomes of H-34-8-2-6-1 and H-24-3-1-5-19-1 were observed during mitosis metaphase to determine the chromosome number. The results showed that the chromosome number of H-34-8-2-6-1 was 2n = 44 (Fig. 2A), and that of H-24-3-1-5-19-1 was 2n = 42 (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2.

Cytogenetic identification of wheat–P. huashanica derivative lines H-34-8-2-6-1 and H-24-3-1-5-19-1. (A) Chromosomes in the root tip somatic cells of H-34-8-2-6-1 during mitotic metaphase (2n = 44). (B) Chromosomes in the root tip somatic cells of H-24-3-1-5-19-1 during metaphase mitosis, (2n = 42). (C) GISH analysis of H-34-8-2-6-1 using the total DNA from P. huashanica as the probe, and the wheat chromosomes were counterstained with PI (red). (D) GISH analysis of H-24-3-1-5-19-1 using the total DNA from P. huashanica as the probe, and the wheat chromosomes were counterstained with PI (red). (E) FISH analysis of the same metaphase after GISH analysis of H-24-3-1-5-19-1 by using pTa535 (red) and pSc119.2 (green) simultaneously as probes, and the wheat chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Arrows indicate the pair of P. huashanica chromosomes.

The root tip cells of the two lines in metaphase of mitosis were tested by GISH with Ns genomic DNA from P. huashanica as the probe and genomic DNA from 7182 as the blocker. The results showed that the root tip cells of H-34-8-2-6-1 contained two telocentric chromosomes with yellow-green hybridization signals, i.e., two additional chromosome arms from P. huashanica (Fig. 2C), thereby confirming that H-34-8-2-6-1 was a wheat–P. huashanica alien ditelosomic addition line. H-24-3-1-5-19-1 had two yellow-green chromosomes with 2n = 42 (Fig. 2D), and thus H-24-3-1-5-19-1 was a wheat–P. huashanica substitution line.

Analysis with EST-STS molecular markers

83 pairs of EST-STS primers were used to identify the homologous groups of exogenous chromosomes in H-34-8-2-6-1 and H-24-3-1-5-19-1. Three EST-STS primers, BE443796, BE497584, and BE446010 (Supplemental Table 2) that mapped to homoeologous group I amplified clear P. huashanica-specific bands in line H-34-8-2-6-1 but none in 7182 (Fig. 3A–3C). However, the other primers did not amplify the specific bands of P. huashanica. Therefore, H-34-8-2-6-1 was considered to be a wheat–P. huashanica 1Ns long arm ditelosomic disomic addition line. Five pairs of EST-STS primers distributed in homoeologous group 2 of wheat amplified P. huashanica-specific bands in H-24-3-1-5-19-1 (Fig. 3D–3H), i.e., BE404332, BE444851, BF146221, BG607805, and CD452803 (Supplemental Table 2), but no specific bands from P. huashanica were amplified by other primers. Thus, the chromosomes from P. huashanica introduced into H-24-3-1-5-19-1 belonged to homoeologous group 2, confirming that H-24-3-1-5-19-1 was a wheat–P. huashanica 2Ns substitution line.

Fig. 3.

Amplification with specific molecular markers distributed in wheat homologous groups and wheat chromosomes. M: DNA ladder (DL2000); 1: 7182; 2:H-34-8-2-6-1; 3: P. huashanica; 4: H-24-3-1-5-19-1. Arrows of A to H indicate the specific amplification product from P. huashanica. Arrows of I to T indicate the specific amplification product from 7182.

SSR molecular marker analysis

222 pairs of SSR primers were used to determine the missing wheat chromosomes in H-24-3-1-5-19-1. Twelve pair of SSR primers distributed on 2D chromosome did not amplify products in H-24-3-1-5-19-1 and P. huashanica, but they amplified obvious specific alleles in 7182 (Supplemental Table 3, Fig. 3I–3T). Other primers amplified the same main amplicon in H-24-3-1-5-19-1 and 7182. These results indicate that a pair of 2D chromosomes from 7182 was missing in H-24-3-1-5-19-1, which preliminarily indicated that H-24-3-1-5-19-1 was a wheat–P. huashanica 2Ns(2D) substitution line.

FISH analysis

Oligo-pSc119.2 (6-FAM-5ʹ) and Oligo-pTa535-1 (Tamra-5ʹ) were used as mixed probes to confirm the missing wheat chromosome in H-24-3-1-5-19-1. All chromosomes were present except for the 2D chromosome in H-24-3-1-5-19-1, thereby confirming that H-24-3-1-5-19-1 lacked a pair of 2D chromosomes (Fig. 2E), which further affirmed H-24-3-1-5-19-1 was a 2Ns(2D) substitution line.

660K genotyping array analyses

Wheat Axiom 660K genotyping arrays were used for genotyping to further explore the chromosomal composition of H-24-3-1-5-19-1. The ratio of heterozygous genotypes on each wheat chromosome in H-24-3-1-5-19-1 was calculated. The results show that the ratio of heterozygous genotypes on the 2D chromosome (32.69%) was significantly higher than that on other wheat chromosomes (Fig. 4). In addition, we calculated the specific SNP ratio for each chromosome in H-24-3-1-5-19-1 compared with P. huashanica and found that the specific SNP ratio (25.82%) on the 2D chromosome in H-24-3-1-5-19-1 was significantly higher than that for the other chromosomes (Fig. 4). Therefore, we confirmed that the missing wheat chromosome was 2D and the P. huashanica chromosome in H-24-3-1-5-19-1 was 2Ns, and H-24-3-1-5-19-1 was a 2Ns(2D) substitution line, thereby validating the results obtained using EST-STS and SSR markers analyses, as well as by FISH analysis.

Fig. 4.

Wheat 660K SNP Array data analysis for H-24-3-1-5-19-1. The blue line represents the heterozygosity ratio for each chromosome in H-24-3-1-5-19-1 and the orange line represents the specific SNP ratio for each chromosome in H-24-3-1-5-19-1 relative only to P. huashanica.

Agronomic traits of resistant materials

The morphological characters determined for H-34-8-2-6-1, H-24-3-1-5-19-1, and their parent wheat 7182 (Fig. 5, Table 2) showed that H-34-8-2-6 had significantly higher kernel number per spike and self-fertility rate than 7182, and H-24-3-1-5-19-1 was much shorter than 7182 (p = 0.05 and 0.01). The other traits determined for H-34-8-2-6-1 and H-24-3-1-5-19-1 were similar to those in 7182.

Fig. 5.

Agronomic traits of resistant materials. Plants (A), spikes (B), spikelets, and seeds (C) in H-34-8-2-6-1 (2), H-24-3-1-5-19-1 (3), and wheat parent 7182 (1).

Table 2. Agronomic traits of H-34-8-2-6-1, H-24-3-1-5-19-1, and wheat parent 7182

Materials	Plant height/cm	Tiller number	Spikelength/cm	Spikelet number per spike	Kernel number per spike	Self-fertility rate/%
7182	78.56 ± 1.43 Aa	7.00 ± 1.49 Aa	8.76 ± 0.37 Aa	18.80 ± 1.23 Aab	56.50 ± 2.88 Bb	75.04 ± 1.76 Bc
H-34-8-2-6-1	76.81 ± 2.04 Aa	7.70 ± 0.95 Aa	8.90 ± 0.68 Aa	19.70 ± 1.34 Aa	66.00 ± 2.26 Aa	84.31 ± 2.36 Aa
H-24-3-1-5-19-1	67.37 ± 4.16 Bb	7.20 ± 0.92 Aa	8.60 ± 0.31 Aa	18.20 ± 1.14 Ab	56.60 ± 3.87 Bb	77.57 ± 2.59 Bb

Different capital and lower case letters indicate significant differences at p = 0.01 and 0.05.

Discussion

FHB is a major disease that severely affects Triticeae crops throughout the world. The best approach for preventing the damage caused by FHB is breeding resistant varieties, which demands the selection and production of resistant sources (Shi et al. 2020). FHB resistances may be assessed differently among years and regions because of environmental influences, thereby hindering the screening of resistant offspring. Since the 1970s, Chinese researchers have successfully identified only two FHB-resistant materials comprising Sumai 3 and Wangshuibai among more than 30,000 test materials. However, long-term planting of with single resistance genes varieties will make the resistance ineffective, so new varieties are urgently needed to improve the FHB resistance of wheat (Gervais et al. 2003, Ruckenbauer et al. 2001). The numerous species related to wheat possess many excellent genes that are lacking in wheat and they can be used as valuable resources to improve the genetic basis for wheat disease resistance (He et al. 2007, Tester and Langridge 2010).

P. huashanica hybridizes well with common wheat. Many studies have shown that P. huashanica is an important material for distant hybridization with wheat because many resistance genes are present on its Ns chromosomes. Numerous disease resistance genes have been found in P. huashanica in recent years (Li et al. 2012, 2020a). However, the resistance to FHB by the interspecific derivatives between wheat and P. huashanica has not been reported. In the present study, the wheat–P. huashanica derivatives H-34-8-2-6-1 and H-24-3-1-5-19-1 exhibited moderate resistance to FHB. The parent wheat 7182 was moderately susceptible whereas both H-34-8-2-6-1 and H-24-3-1-5-19-1 were moderately resistant, and thus the FHB resistance genes came from P. huashanica. H-34-8-2-6-1 was identified as a wheat–P. huashanica 1NS long arm ditelosomic addition line and H-24-3-1-5-19-1 as a wheat–P. huashanica 2Ns(2D) substitution line in this study.

In previous studies, the wheat–P. huashanica 2Ns(2D) substitution line 16-6 was highly resistant to wheat stripe rust (Du et al. 2015). And the wheat–P. huashanica 2Ns(2D) substitution line H139 enhanced wheat take-all disease resistance (Bai et al. 2020). In the present study, H-24-3-1-5-19-1 was also a wheat–P. huashanica 2Ns(2D) substitution line but it provided resistance to FHB. Thus, wheat–P. huashanica 2Ns(2D) substitution lines contain many disease resistance genes which need to further studied. The wheat–P. huashanica 1Ns addition lines 12-3 was highly resistant to brown leaf rust and the wheat–P. huashanica 1Ns disomic addition line H5-5-4-2 had immunity to powdery mildew at the seedling and adult stages (Du et al. 2014a, Han et al. 2020). However, wheat–P. huashanica 1Ns long arm ditelosomic addition line has not been identified previously. Thus, H-34-8-2-6-1 provides a new derivative material and a new germplasm resource between wheat and P. huashanica. Due to introduction of the whole exogenous chromosome in addition line and substitution line, the beneficial genes are often introduce along with the undesirable genes carried on the chromosome. The translocation lines carrying the target character, especially the small fragment translocation line, can be created by the EMS mutagenesis and and ⁶⁰Co radiation of H-24-3-1-5-19-1 and H-34-8-2-6-1, which will greatly reduce the effects of the undesirable genes and increase the stability of exogenous genes in wheat.

The yield of wheat varieties bred by inter-variety hybridization decreased, and the disease resistance decreased or even disappeared (Fischer and Edmeades 2010, Li et al. 2008). While wild relatives of wheat carry many beneficial genes (Tester and Langridge 2010). In order to find new strategies for high yield and disease resistance, many researchers have tried to integrate disease resistance genes from wild related species into cereal cultivation background to improve wheat yield and resistance. Chromosomes or chromosome fragments can be infiltrated from one species to another by distant hybridization (Anderson 1953, Mallet 2007). Interspecific hybridization is the first step to introduce foreign variation and transfer ideal traits from wild species to cultivated species (Sharma and Gill 1983). In the early stage of the laboratory, the common wheat 7182 was used as the female parent and the psathyrostachys huashanica was used as the male parent for hybridization, and a heptaploid hybrid ‘H8911’ (2n = 49) was created (Chen et al. 1991). By backcrossing 7182 with ‘H8911’ and selfing for nine generation, 45 interspecific derivatives between wheat and P. huashanica were obtained in this study. In addition, the chromosomes of the hybrid F₁ can be doubled by chromosome doubling to produce an amphidiploid. The man-made crop Triticale (X Triticosecale Wittmack) is an amphidiploid between wheat and rye (Gupta and Priyadarshan 1982). The amphidiploid can be further used as a bridge for the introgression of aline genes or the development of aline chromosome addition, substitution, translocation lines (Jiang et al. 1993).

In this study, assessed the resistance to FHB in 45 interspecific derivatives between wheat and P. huashanica and identified two resistant lines comprising H-34-8-2-6-1 and H-24-3-1-5-19-1. Analyses based on GISH, FISH, EST-STS, SSR, and 660K genotyping arrays confirmed H-34-8-2-6-1 as a wheat–P. huashanica 1Ns long arm ditelosomic addition line and H-24-3-1-5-19-1 as a 2Ns(2D) substitution line. These new FHB-resistant materials can be applied to creat small alien chromatin introgressed line in wheat breeding.

Author Contribution Statement

JW conceived and designed the experiments. CCH, JH, LZ performed the study. LLZ and QG analyzed the date. SHL, QHY and XHC contributed new methods or models. CCH wrote the paper. All authors have reviewed drafts of the paper and approved the final draft.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Dr. Duncan E. Jackson for his language editing and checking of scientific consistency. This research was funded by the Key Research and Development Project of Shaanxi Province, grant number 2019ZDLNY04-05.

Literature Cited

•  Abaya,  A.,  M.  Serajazari and  T.  Hsiang (2021) Control of Fusarium head blight using the endophytic fungus, Simplicillium lamellicola, and its effect on the growth of Triticum aestivum. Biol Control 160: 104684.
•  Anderson,  E. (1953) Introgressive hybridization. Biol Rev 28: 280–307.
•  Bai,  G. and  G.  Shaner (2004) Management and resistance in wheat and barley to Fusarium head blight. Annu Rev Phytopathol 42: 135–161.
•  Bai,  S.S.,  F.P.  Yuan,  H.B.  Zhang,  Z.Y.  Zhang,  J.X.  Zhao,  Q.H.  Yang,  J.  Wu and  X.H.  Chen (2020) Characterization of the wheat-Psathyrostachys huashania Keng 2Ns/2D substitution line H139: A novel germplasm with enhanced resistance to wheat take-all. Front Plant Sci 11: 233.
•  Cainong,  J.C.,  W.W.  Bockus,  Y.  Feng,  P.  Chen,  L.  Qi,  S.K.  Sehgal,  T.V.  Danilova,  D.H.  Koo,  B.  Friebe and  B.S.  Gill (2015) Chromosome engineering, mapping, and transferring of resistance to Fusarium head blight disease from Elymus tsukushiensis into wheat. Theor Appl Genet 128: 1019–1027.
•  Chang,  L.,  S.  Zhang,  W.N.  Wang,  H.S.  Zhang,  Q.  Lin and  P.  Mu (2015) Research progress on chromosome engineering breeding for resistance to Fusarium Head Blight (FHB) in wheat. Mol Plant Breed 13: 214–220.
•  Chen,  S.Y.,  A.J.  Zhang and  J.  Fu (1991) The hybridization between Triticum aestivum and Psathyrostachys huashaica. Acta Genet Sin 18: 508–512.
•  Cuthbert,  P.A.,  D.J.  Somers,  J.  Thomas,  S.  Cloutier and  A.  Brulé-Babel (2006) Fine mapping Fhb1, a major gene controlling fusarium head blight resistance in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet 112: 1465–1472.
•  Cuthbert,  P.A.,  D.J.  Somers and  A.  Brulé-babel (2007) Mapping of Fhb2 on chromosome 6BS: A gene controlling Fusarium head blight field resistance in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet 114: 429–437.
•  Desjardins,  A.E. and  T.M.  Hohn (1997) Mycotoxins in plant pathogenesis. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 10: 147–152.
•  Du,  W.L.,  J.  Wang,  M.  Lu,  S.G.  Sun,  X.H.  Chen,  J.X.  Zhao,  Q.H.  Yang and  J.  Wu (2013a) Molecular cytogenetic identification of a wheat-Psathyrostachys huashanica Keng 5Ns disomic addition line with stripe rust resistance. Mol Breed 31: 879–888.
•  Du,  W.L.,  J.  Wang,  L.M.  Wang,  J.  Zhang,  X.H.  Chen,  J.X.  Zhao,  Q.H.  Yang and  J.  Wu (2013b) Development and characterization of a Psathyrostachys huashanica Keng 7Ns chromosome addition line with leaf rust resistance. PLoS One 8: e70879.
•  Du,  W.L.,  J.  Wang,  Y.H.  Pang,  J.  Wu,  J.X.  Zhao,  S.H.  Liu,  Q.H.  Yang and  X.H.  Chen (2014a) Development and application of PCR markers specific to the 1Ns chromosome of Psathyrostachys huashanica Keng with leaf rust resistance. Euphytica 200: 207–220.
•  Du,  W.L.,  J.  Wang,  M.  Lu,  S.G.  Sun,  X.H.  Chen,  J.X.  Zhao,  Q.H.  Yang and  J.  Wu (2014b) Characterization of a wheat-Psathyrostachys huashanica Keng 4Ns disomic addition line for enhanced tiller numbers and stripe rust resistance. Planta 239: 97–105.
•  Du,  W.L.,  J.  Wang,  Y.H.  Pang,  L.M.  Wang,  J.  Wu,  J.X.  Zhao,  Q.H.  Yang and  X.H.  Chen (2014c) Isolation and characterization of a wheat-Psathyrostachys huashanica ‘Keng’ 3Ns disomic addition line with resistance to stripe rust. Genome 57: 37–44.
•  Du,  W.L.,  J.  Wang,  L.M.  Wang,  J.  Wu,  J.X.  Zhao,  S.H.  Liu,  Q.H.  Yang and  X.H.  Chen (2014d) Molecular characterization of a wheat–Psathyrostachys huashanica Keng 2Ns disomic addition line with resistance to stripe rust. Mol Genet Genomics 289: 735–743.
•  Du,  W.L.,  J.X.  Zhao,  J.  Wang,  L.M.  Wang,  J.  Wu,  Q.H.  Yang,  S.H.  Liu and  X.H.  Chen (2015) Cytogenetic and molecular marker-based characterization of a wheat-Psathyrostachys huashanica Keng 2Ns(2D) substitution line. Plant Mol Biol Rep 33: 414–423.
•  Duveiller,  E.,  M.  Mezzalama,  J.  Murakami,  J.  Lewis and  T.  Ban (2008) Global Fusarium Networking. Cereal Res Commun 36: 11–19.
•  Fischer,  R.A. and  G.O.  Edmeades (2010) Breeding and cereal yield progress. Crop Sci 50: S85–S98.
•  Gervais,  L.,  F.  Dedryver,  J.Y.  Morlais,  V.  Bodusseau,  S.  Negre,  M.  Bilous,  C.  Groos and  M.  Trottet (2003) Mapping of quantitative trait loci for field resistance to Fusarium head blight in an European winter wheat. Theor Appl Genet 106: 961–970.
•  Goswami,  R.S. and  H.C.  Kistler (2004) Heading for disaster: Fusarium graminearum on cereal crops. Mol Plant Pathol 5: 515–525.
•  Gunupuru,  L.R.,  A.  Perochon and  F.M.  Doohan (2017) Deoxynivalenol resistance as a component of FHB resistance. Trop Plant Pathol 42: 175–183.
•  Guo,  J.,  X.L.  Zhang,  Y.L.  Hou,  J.J.  Cai,  X.R.  Shen,  T.T.  Zhou,  H.H.  Xu,  H.W.  Ohm,  H.W.  Wang,  A.F.  Li et al. (2015) High-density mapping of the major FHB resistance gene Fhb7 derived from Thinopyrum ponticum and its pyramiding with Fhb1 by marker-assisted selection. Theor Appl Genet 128: 2301–2316.
•  Gupta,  P.K. and  P.M.  Priyadarshan (1982) Triticale: Present status and future prospects. Adv Genet 21: 255–345.
•  Gupta,  P.,  H.  Balyan,  K.  Edwards,  P.  Isaac,  V.  Korzun,  M.  Röder,  M.F.  Gautier,  P.  Joudrier,  A.  Schlatter,  J.  Dubcovsky et al. (2002) Genetic mapping of 66 new microsatellite (SSR) loci in bread wheat. Theor Appl Genet 105: 413–422.
•  Han,  J.,  Y.X.  Liu,  C.C.  Hou,  J.C.  Li,  J.L.  Wang,  Q.Y.  Zhang,  Q.H.  Yang,  X.H.  Chen and  J.  Wu (2020) A 1Ns disomic addition from Psathyrostachys Huashanica Keng confers resistance to powdery mildew in wheat. Agronomy 10: 312.
•  He,  D.X.,  H.J.  Li,  S.C.  Xu,  X.Y.  Duan,  Y.L.  Zhou and  L.H.  Li (2007) Reaction to powdery mildew and stripe rust in related species and landraces of wheat. Genet Resour Crop Evol 54: 213–219.
• Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Institute of Plant Protection, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences (2007) Rulers for Resistance Evaluation of Wheat to Diseases and Insect Pests Part4: Rule for Resistance Evaluation of Wheat to Wheat Scab, Agricultural Standard.
•  Jiang,  J.M.,  B.  Friebe and  B.S.  Gill (1993) Recent advances in alien gene transfer in wheat. Euphytica 73: 199–212.
•  Kang,  H.Y.,  Y.  Wang,  G.  Fedak,  W.G.  Cao,  H.Q.  Zhang,  X.  Fan,  L.N.  Sha,  L.L.  Xu,  Y.L.  Zheng and  Y.H.  Zhou (2011) Introgression of chromosome 3Ns from Psathyrostachys huashanica into wheat specifying resistance to stripe rust. PLoS One 6: e21802.
•  Krska,  R. (2009) Mycotoxins. Anal Bioanal Chem 395: 1203–1204.
•  Li,  H.,  T.  Lu,  W.D.  Huang,  Y.  Yang,  C.  Zhan,  D.F.  Ma and  J.L.  Yin (2020a) Cytological identification and resistance inheritance in wheat-Psathyrostachys huashanica translocation line H1684. Mol Plant Breed 18: 3643–3648.
•  Li,  J.C.,  X.N.  Yao,  Z.J.  Yang,  X.N.  Cheng,  F.P.  Yuan,  Y.  Liu,  J.  Wu,  Q.H.  Yang,  J.X.  Zhao and  X.H.  Chen (2019) Molecular cytogenetic characterization of a novel wheat–Psathyrostachys huashanica Keng 5Ns (5D) disomic substitution line with stripe rust resistance. Mol Breed 39: 1–15.
•  Li,  J.C.,  Y.  Liu,  X.N.  Cheng,  X.N.  Yao,  Z.J.  Yang,  J.  Wu,  Q.H.  Yang,  J.X.  Zhao and  X.H.  Chen (2020b) Molecular characteristics and inheritance of a chromosome segment from Psathyrostachys huashanica Keng in a wheat background. Genet Resour Crop Evol 67: 1245–1257.
•  Li,  J.C.,  L.  Zhao,  X.N.  Cheng,  G.H.  Bai,  M.  Li,  J.  Wu,  Q.H.  Yang,  X.H.  Chen,  Z.J.  Yang and  J.X.  Zhao (2020c) Molecular cytogenetic characterization of a novel wheat–Psathyrostachys huashanica Keng T3DS-5NsL·5NsS and T5DL-3DS·3DL dual translocation line with powdery mildew resistance. BMC Plant Biol 20: 1–13.
•  Li,  Q.,  J.  Huang,  L.  Hou,  P.  Liu,  J.X.  Jing,  B.T.  Wang and  Z.S.  Kang (2012) Genetic and molecular mapping of stripe rust resistance gene in wheat-Psathyrostachys huashanica translocation line H9020-1-6-8-3. Plant Dis 96: 1482–1487.
•  Li,  Z.S.,  B.  Li and  Y.P.  Tong (2008) The contribution of distant hybridization with decaploid Agropyron elongatum to wheat improvement in China. J Genet Genomics 35: 451–456.
•  Liu,  H.P.,  Y.  Dai,  D.  Chi,  S.  Huang,  H.F.  Li,  Y.M.  Duan,  W.G.  Cao,  Y.  Gao,  G.  Fedak and  J.M.  Chen (2017a) Production and molecular cytogenetic characterization of a durum wheat-Thinopyrum elongatum 7E disomic addition line with resistance to Fusarium head blight. Cytogenet Genome Res 153: 165–173.
•  Liu,  X.L.,  C.  Wang,  L.H.  Niu,  Z.L.  Liu,  L.D.  Zhang,  C.H.  Chen,  R.Q.  Zhang,  H.  Zhang,  C.Y.  Wang,  Y.J.  Wang et al. (2017b) Molecular identification of FHB resistance gene in varieties derived from common wheat-Thinopyrum ponticum partial amphiploid. Sci Agric Sin 50: 3908–3917.
•  Lu,  Q.X.,  H.Y.  Yang,  J.H.  Xu,  J.R.  Shi and  Y.F.  Wei (2008) Evaluation of barley resistance to Fusarium head blight. Jiangsu J Agric Sci 24: 533–535.
•  Mallet,  J. (2007) Hybrid speciation. Nature 446: 279–283.
•  McMullen,  M.,  R.  Jones and  D.  Gallenberg (1997) Scab of wheat and barley: A re-emerging disease of devasting impact. Plant Dis 81: 1340–1348.
•  Osborne,  L.E. and  J.M.  Stein (2007) Epidemiology of Fusarium head blight on small-grain cereals. Int J Food Microbiol 119: 103–108.
•  Pestsova,  E.,  M.W.  Ganal and  M.S.  Röder (2000) Isolation and mapping of microsatellite markers specific for the D genome of bread wheat. Genome 43: 689–697.
•  Qi,  L.L.,  M.O.  Pumphrey,  B.  Friebe,  P.D.  Chen and  B.S.  Gill (2008) Molecular cytogenetic characterization of alien introgressions with gene Fhb3 for resistance to Fusarium head blight disease of wheat. Theor Appl Genet 117: 1155–1166.
•  Röder,  M.S.,  V.  Korzun,  K.  Wendehake,  J.  Plaschke,  M.H.  Tixier,  P.  Leroy and  M.W.  Ganal (1998) A microsatellite map of wheat. Genetics 149: 2007–2023.
•  Ruckenbauer,  P.,  H.  Buerstmayr and  M.  Lemmens (2001) Present strategies in resistance breeding against scab (Fusarium spp.). Euphytica 119: 123–129.
•  Sharma,  H.C. and  B.S.  Gill (1983) Current status of wide hybridization in wheat. Euphytica 32: 17–31.
•  Shi,  S.D.,  J.C.  Zhao,  L.F.  Pu,  D.J.  Sun,  D.J.  Han,  C.L.  Li,  X.J.  Feng,  D.S.  Fan and  X.P.  Hu (2020) Identification of new sources of resistance to crown rot and Fusarium head blight in wheat. Plant Dis 104: 1979–1985.
•  Tan,  M.K.,  S.  Simpfendorfer,  D.  Backhouse and  G.M.  Murray (2004) Occurrence of Fusarium head blight (FHB) in southern NSW in 2000: identification of causal fungi and determination of putative chemotype of Fusarium graminearum isolates by PCR. Australas Plant Pathol 33: 385–392.
•  Tester,  M. and  P.  Langridge (2010) Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world. Science 327: 818–822.
•  Wang,  L.S. and  P.D.  Chen (2008) Development of Triticum aestivum-Leymus racemosus ditelosomic substitution line 7Lr#1S(7A) with resistance to wheat scab and its meiotic behavior analysis. Chin Sci Bull 53: 3522–3529.
•  Wu,  J.,  X.M.  Yang,  H.  Wang,  H.J.  Li,  L.H.  Li,  X.Q.  Li and  W.H.  Liu (2006) The introgression of chromosome 6P specifying for increased numbers of florets and kernels from Agropyron cristatum into wheat. Theor Appl Genet 114: 13–20.
•  Xue,  S.L.,  G.Q.  Li,  H.Y.  Jia,  F.  Xu,  F.  Lin,  M.Z.  Tang,  Y.  Wang,  X.  An,  H.B.  Xu,  L.X.  Zhang et al. (2010) Fine mapping Fhb4, a major QTL conditioning resistance to Fusarium infection in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet 121: 147–156.
•  Xue,  S.L.,  F.  Xu,  M.Z.  Tang,  Y.  Zhou,  G.Q.  Li,  X.  An,  F.  Lin,  H.B.  Xu,  H.Y.  Jia,  L.X.  Zhang et al. (2011) Precise mapping Fhb5, a major QTL conditioning resistance to Fusarium infection in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet 123: 1055–1063.
•  Zhang,  W.,  S.  Chao,  F.  Manthey,  O.  Chicaiza,  J.C.  Brevis,  V.  Echenique and  J.  Dubcovsky (2008) QTL analysis of pasta quality using a composite microsatellite and SNP map of durum wheat. Theor Appl Genet 117: 1361–1377.
•  Zhang,  Y.L. and  L.S.  Wang (2018) Molecular and cytogenetic identification of Triticum aestivum-Leymus racemosus translocation line T6DL·7LrS. Chin J Biotechnol 34: 1823–1830.
•  Zhao,  J.X.,  W.Q.  Ji,  J.  Wu,  X.H.  Chen,  X.N.  Cheng,  J.W.  Wang,  Y.H.  Pang,  S.H.  Liu and  Q.H.  Yang (2010) Development and identification of a wheat-Psathyrostachys huashanica addition line carrying HMW-GS, LMW-GS and gliadin genes. Genet Resour Crop Evol 57: 387–394.