Journal of Japan Society for Blood Purification in Critical Care
Online ISSN : 2434-219X
Print ISSN : 2185-1085
Examination on the reason for circuit replacement of continuous renal replacement therapy in ICU
Yusuke HamadaKenichiro MorisawaToru YoshidaYoshihiro IgarashiToru ShimizuSoichiro InoueYasuhiko TairaShigeki Fujitani
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2020 Volume 11 Issue 2 Pages 138-142

Details
Abstract

【Background】Prismaflex®, which was launched in 2018, this feature is expected to reduce coagulation within the circuit. 【Method】We divided TR-55X® (Toray Medical) and Prismaflex® (Baxter) used in our hospital, in order to retrospectively compare the effects on coagulation within the circuit. 【Results】Frequency of unexpected circuit exchange was significantly higher in the P group (p=0.003). The returning blood pressure was significantly higher in the TR group (p=0.003). There were four “other causes” other than increased return blood pressure and increased inlet pressure only in the P group. 【Conclusion】There were many unexpected circuit changes with P group, due to blood coagulation in the hemofilter or deviations in the operating procedure; consequently, going forward, it was considered that the results could be improved by improving the hemofilter and mastering the operation.

Content from these authors
© 2020, Japan Society for Blood Purification in Critical Care
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top