2020 Volume 76 Issue 2 Pages 100-113
A recent study by Akamatsu et al.1) has provided a simple classification of economic geography models according to their comparative static properties with respect to transport costs in a homogeneous geographical space. This study clarifies that models belonging to different classes have qualitatively different behavior even when evaluating the impact of transport infrastructure improvement in a heterogeneous geographical space. Specifically, by comparing a pair of new economic geography models, Helpman13) and Pflüger and Tabuchi17), we demonstrate that an improvement in transport access disperses population from larger regions in the former model, while it enlarges the population size of larger ones in the latter.