Evaluation of student counseling system by collaboration between faculty and clinical psychologists

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to discuss the merits and limitations of using practical and qualitative research methods in evaluating student counseling system. Clinical psychologists and other members of a community will evaluate services together efficiently when they use practical and qualitative methods, such as action research, case study, and practical fieldwork. Using them is not only useful for assuring reliability and validity of evaluation, but also for developing a more collaborative relationship between clinical psychologists and other people concerned in student counseling. A study which evaluates a student counseling system by interviewing faculty is presented as an example of this type of study.