Japanese Journal of Food Microbiology
Online ISSN : 1882-5982
Print ISSN : 1340-8267
ISSN-L : 1340-8267
Evaluation of PCR-Based Identification and Genotyping Methods for theiapGenes inListeria monocytogenesand otherListeriaspp.
Katsuyuki ISHIMURASatoshi INOUETakayuki KAYASHIMASusumu YOSHINOTANIFumiaki ITOHYoshio KASAMAMasaru MATSUMOTOTakeo OGINO
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2006 Volume 23 Issue 4 Pages 223-229

Details
Abstract

By using 181 Listeria spp. strains except for L. ivanovii, we evaluated the three distinct PCR methods targeting the iap genes encoding p60 proteins for genus or species identification, and the PCR-RFLP analysis for genotyping. Each of the two species-specific PCR methods yielded the expected amplicons from all of the 126 L. monocytogenes and 43 L. innocua strains tested. The genus-specific PCR method amplified the target regions (about 1.4 kb) from 178 Listeria strains other than3 L. grayi strains tested. The PCR-RFLP analysis with either HhaI or HindIII showed distinct several patterns: 97L. monocytogenes strains divided into 2 genotypes (types I and II) with Hind III and 5 genotypes (types A, B, C, D and E) withHhaI. On the other hand, 43 L. innocua strains showed an identical genotype (type I with Hind III and type F withHhal). Bot h L. seeligeri and L. welshimeri strains showed a distinct genotype (type I withHind III and type G withHhal). The L. monocytogenes genotypes correlated with the serovars. All 4b strains exhibited one genotype (type I and type A). 1/2b strains exhibited type I and types A or B. In contrast, 1/2a strains exhibited type II and types C, D, or E. 1/2c strains exhibited only type II and type C. Thus, these results suggest that the PCR and PCR-RFLP methods can identify or estimate the genus and species of listerial strains rapidly and are useful tools to genotype Listeria spp. strains phylogenetically.

Content from these authors
© Japanese Society Food Microbiology
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top