Nihon Shoukaki Gan Kenshin Gakkai zasshi
Online ISSN : 2185-1190
Print ISSN : 1880-7666
ISSN-L : 1880-7666
Original article
Discriminating between the true-group A and the pseudo-group A, based on the data by the test of risk stratification for gastric cancer and diagnosis of gastrointestinal fluoroscopy
Sachie HIROSAWAKyoko MINAKAWAYoko SAITOKeisuke OKAYASUJun KUWABARAYumiko SUZUKIYoshitake TOMIYAMAMichiko NISHIKIDOShuta HAYAKAWA
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2020 Volume 58 Issue 2 Pages 93-103

Details
Abstract

There were 478 candidates, who underwent not only a barium X-ray examination but also a combination test of serum anti-Helicobacter pylori IgG antibody (H.pylori test) and serum pepsinogen level by PG method, which is called the test of risk stratification for gastric cancer. The cut-off level was less than 4.0 U/mL for H.pylori test (Wako Pure Chemical Corporation), and Miki's criteria was adopted for PG method. The candidates were divided into five groups, A (−/−) 312, B (+/−) 78, C (+/+) 28, D (−/+) 3, and E (57), depending on the results of H.pylori and PG test (H.pylori /PG) or whether there is a previous history of eradication therapy. The group A by this method is seemingly expected to have non gastritis. The candidates in group A, however, were divided into two groups depending on the X-ray results. One group (252, 81%) comprises candidates with no gastritis, and the other group (60, 19%) comprises those who have. The latter group, with 60 candidates, may be called pseudo-group A. Twelve candidates in pseudo-group A exhibited a high level of PGII, which is more than 14 ng/mL, or a low level of PGI/PGII, which is less than 5 ng/mL. When those candidates were excluded from group A, pseudo-group A decreased in number.

Content from these authors
© 2020 The Japanese Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer Screening
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top