Microbes and Environments
Online ISSN : 1347-4405
Print ISSN : 1342-6311
ISSN-L : 1342-6311
Regular Paper
Evaluation of Soil Antagonism against the White Root Rot Fungus Rosellinia necatrix and Pathogen Mycosphere Communities in Biochar-amended Soil
Yong Guo Sachie HoriiSatoko Kanematsu
著者情報
ジャーナル オープンアクセス HTML
電子付録

2024 年 39 巻 4 号 論文ID: ME24060

詳細
Abstract

White root rot disease caused by Rosellinia necatrix is a growing issue in orchards, and biochar pyrolyzed from the pruned branch residues of fruit trees has potential as a soil amendment agent with a number of benefits, such as long-term carbon sequestration. However, the effects of pruned branch biochar on white root rot disease remain unclear. Therefore, we compared direct antagonism against R. necatrix between soils with and without pruned pear branch biochar using a toothpick method and then linked soil physicochemical properties and microbial communities with soil antagonism. The results obtained showed that soil antagonism against the pathogen, that is, the extinction zone of R. necatrix in mycelial toothpicks, decreased in soils amended with 20% (v/v) pruned branch biochar. Soil pH was neutralized and aeration was promoted by the biochar amendment, which may be favorable for pathogen growth. An investigation of microbial communities surrounding R. necatrix mycelia indicated that antagonistic fungi affiliated with Chaetomiaceae and Trichoderma were selectively excluded from the mycosphere community in biochar-amended soil. Therefore, the enrichment of these indigenous antagonistic fungi may be important for controlling R. necatrix. Based on the present results, we do not recommend the application of pruned branch biochar to the soil area associated with the roots of fruit trees in order to avoid increasing the risk of white root rot in orchards.

White root rot caused by the ascomycete fungus Rosellinia necatrix is one of the most serious soil-borne diseases threatening wood crops in temperate and subtropical areas worldwide (Pérez-Jiménez, 2006; Pliego et al., 2012). As a pathogenic agent, R. necatrix infects and necrotizes the roots of economically important plants, such as apples, pears, peaches, grapes, avocados, and olives (Sztejnberg and Madar, 1980). Host attacks by R. necatrix depend on soil temperature, oxygen, the water balance, organic matter content, pH, and soil microbiome (Pliego et al., 2012; Carlucci et al., 2013); therefore, changes in these soil features have a reasonable impact on disease occurrence.

Biochar is a carbon-enriched solid produced by pyrolyzing biomass materials under oxygen-deficient conditions at high temperatures (Lehmann et al., 2006). As a soil amendment agent, biochar has potential for long-term carbon sequestration, greenhouse gas mitigation, and waste management (Lehmann et al., 2006; Lehmann, 2007; He et al., 2017). With respect to control strategies for plant diseases, a growing number of studies have revealed that the application of biochar effectively suppresses phytopathogens through various mechanisms, such as changing soil physicochemical properties, inducing systemic plant defenses, adsorbing toxins produced by pathogens, and reshaping the soil microbiome (Poveda et al., 2021). Moreover, suppressive effects have mainly been reported on soil-borne diseases caused by the bacterium Ralstonia solanacearum and by the fungi Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium species (Poveda et al., 2021; Arshad et al., 2024). In addition, the effectiveness of this suppression appears to differ with the crop type. A global meta-ana­lysis showed that biochar effectively decreased disease severity in vegetables, berries, and tobacco; however, this suppressive effect was limited in cereal grains and perennial trees (Yang et al., 2022). Further studies are required to examine the biochar-mediated control of more diverse phytopathogens, particularly those that are harmful to perennial wood crops.

The Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai), one of the most widely cultivated fruit trees in Japan, is typically pruned during the winter to encourage more fruiting buds and reduce bud height (Bound, 2022). The return of pruned branch residues to orchard soil is not recommended because of the increased risk of plant disease, and usual disposal by open burning results in the general emission of greenhouse gases and an adverse environmental impact. As an alternative to open burning, soil amendment with biochar pyrolyzed from pruned branch residues has the potential to reduce CO2 and N2O emissions from pear orchards (Oo et al., 2018), suggesting a novel carbon-neutral strategy suitable for wood crops. However, some wood waste biochars increase the severity of damping-off caused by R. solani in various crops (Copley et al., 2015). Therefore, proper risk management and careful evaluations are essential when considering biochar use (Godlewska et al., 2021; Tan and Yu, 2024).

Due to the serious perniciousness of white root rot disease in pear cultivation, the present study exami­ned the effects of pruned pear branch biochar on the pathogenic fungus R. necatrix. A useful evaluation method using R. necatrix-colonized toothpicks (Takahashi and Nakamura, 2020) was employed to compare soil antagonism against the pathogen in soils with and without the application of pruned branch biochar. The physicochemical properties of soil and the microbiome surrounding mycelia of the pathogen were also investigated to identify the abiotic and biotic factors affecting soil antagonism against R. necatrix. The results obtained herein provide insights into the development of information-based biocontrol strategies for soil-borne diseases, which are essential for the application of pruned branch biochar in orchards.

Materials and Methods

Study sites, soil sampling, and preparation

Four orchards with different treatments were selected to evaluate the effects of the biochar amendment on soil antagonism against the white root rot fungus R. necatrix (Rn). Three of these orchards, Tsukuba-A, Tsukuba-B, and Tsukuba-C, located in the National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO) in Tsukuba, Japan, were continuously planted with the Japanese pear ‘Kosui’ for more than 10 years. Undergrowth vegetation in Tsukuba-A and Tsukuba-B was managed automatically without any herbicide and pruned by a robot lawn mower, whereas that in Tsukuba-C was exterminated by the periodic spraying of herbicides. In Tsukuba-A and half of Tsukuba-B (Tsukuba-B1), the undergrowth was dominated by low gramineous grasses (height <5‍ ‍cm), whereas the other half of Tsukuba-B (Tsukuba-B2) was mainly covered by high Chenopodiaceae grasses (height >20‍ ‍cm). An orchard located in the Chiba Prefectural Agriculture and Forestry Research Center in Chiba, Japan, named ‘Chiba’, was continuously planted with Japanese pear ‘Akizuki’, and the undergrowth in this orchard was managed by the periodic spraying of herbicides. The soil in all four orchards was classified as Andosol.

Six soil samples were collected from the four orchards and prepared to evaluate antagonism against R. necatrix according to the procedure reported by Takahashi and Nakamura (2020). Briefly, soil between depths of 5 and 30‍ ‍cm was collected from a 20×20‍ ‍cm square that was 50‍ ‍cm away from the pear tree trunk. Soil samples S1 and S2 were collected from Tsukuba-A in May 2023 and July 2023, respectively. Samples S3, S4, and S5 were collected from Tsukuba-B1, Tsukuba-B2, and Tsukuba-C, respectively, in October 2023. Sample S6 was collected from the Chiba Orchard in August 2023. All soil samples were sieved through a 4-mm mesh for use. The biochar used in this study was prepared by pyrolyzing the pruned branch of Japanese pear in a smokeless carbonizer (MOKI) at a temperature of approximately 600°C, as described in a previous study (Oo et al., 2018). Biochar (size–2–4‍ ‍mm) was sieved and mixed thoroughly with soil samples at a volume ratio of 20% (equivalent to a weight ratio range of 5–6%) for the evaluation of antagonism.

Evaluation of soil antagonism against R. necatrix

In the present study, R. necatrix strains W97 (MAFF625116) and W563 (MAFF645027) were used to evaluate soil antagonism against R. necatrix. The toothpick method was performed as described by Takahashi and Nakamura (2020). Each tested strain was preincubated in a polycarbonate box (CUL-JAR300; AGC TECHNO GLASS) containing 50‍ ‍mL of potato dextrose agar (PDA) (Difco) at 23°C for 3 days; another box with 25 holes (2.5‍ ‍mm in diameter) on the bottom was then stacked onto the first box. Birchwood toothpicks (65‍ ‍mm in length) autoclaved in distilled water were inserted into the holes of the upper box to reach the fungal colonies in the lower box. After covering the upper box with a lid, this set was incubated at 23°C for 2–3‍ ‍weeks until the toothpicks were fully colonized by mycelia. The upper box with toothpicks was recovered, and 0–10‍ ‍mm of the tips of the toothpicks were immersed in 45°C water for 30‍ ‍min to kill R. necatrix inhabiting the tips. The upper box was then stacked onto a new box containing 160‍ ‍mL of the tested soil to place 0–30‍ ‍mm of the tips of the toothpicks into the soil. This set was incubated at 23°C for 4‍ ‍weeks to measure the length of the extinction zone of R. necatrix mycelia, i.e., the distance from the toothpick tip to the mycelial margin (Supplementary Fig. S1), under a stereomicroscope (Leica). The length of the extinction zone was measured for 16 toothpicks in the periphery, and the mean value of the 16 toothpicks was calculated for each device. A single experiment was performed for each soil sample in triplicate, i.e., using three sets of toothpick devices. The mean value of three devices was calculated as the result of soil antagonism. Soil without biochar, that is, biochar-free soil, was used as the control (CS).

Assessing the severity of white root rot in biochar-amended soils (BS) in pots

R. necatrix attacks more than 170 hosts of both herbaceous and woody plants (Pliego et al., 2012), and some leguminous and rosaceous plants have been used to estimate the virulence of this fungus (Uetake et al., 2001; Kanematsu et al., 2004). Therefore, to further assess the disease severity of white root rot in BS, R. necatrix strains W97 and W563 were inoculated into mung (Vigna radiata) and apple (Malus prunifolia var. ringo) plants in pots, according to Kanematsu (2014) with minor modifications. Soil between depths of 5 and 30‍ ‍cm was collected from a fallow orchard in NARO in Tsukuba and mixed thoroughly with 20% (v/v) pear branch biochar. The inoculum of R. necatrix was prepared using wheat grains according to Sawant et al. (2023) with minor modifications. Briefly, 200‍ ‍g of wheat grain was soaked in 300‍ ‍mL of distilled water for 5 h, autoclaved, and inoculated with five pieces (7‍ ‍mm in diameter) of the 7-day-old PDA culture of R. necatrix. After incubating at 23°C for 2‍ ‍weeks, the fungus grew uniformly, fully covering the wheat grains. The inoculum used for apples was prepared according to the procedure described by Kanematsu et al. (2004). One-year-old shoots of Japanese pear (7–10‍ ‍mm in diameter) were cut into 20-mm-long fragments, soaked in distilled water, and autoclaved. Approximately 10–12 of the autoclaved fragments were placed on a PDA dish with the 7-day growing pathogen and incubated at 23°C for 4‍ ‍weeks, until shoot fragments were entirely covered by R. necatrix mycelia.

Mung seeds were germinated at 20°C for 2 days in a Petri dish with a piece of wet filter paper. Two germinated seeds were sown in BS in the center of a 300-mL pot, whereas a 1-year-old apple plant (approximately 10‍ ‍mm in diameter) was transplanted into BS in a 1,500-mL pot. Seven mung pots and six apple pots were prepared and cultivated in a 25°C phytotron for 2‍ ‍weeks and 4‍ ‍weeks, respectively, until the inoculation with R. necatrix. Regarding the inoculation, two grains of R. necatrix-colonized wheat seeds were placed for attachment to the root at a depth of 1‍ ‍cm for each mung seedling, whereas two pieces of R. necatrix-colonized shoot fragments were inoculated on the root at a depth of 7‍ ‍cm for each apple plant. The pots were cultivated in the 25°C phytotron. Disease severity on mung and apple plants was estimated at 11 days post-inoculation (dpi) and 38 dpi, respectively, and rated as follows: 0, healthy; 1, wilting of <50% leaves; 2, wilting of ≥50% leaves; 3, entirely withered and dead. Inoculation experiments were repeated twice for each plant.

Soil physicochemical ana­lysis

To measure soil physicochemical properties, 50 to 500‍ ‍g of each soil mixed thoroughly with 20% (v/v) of the pear branch biochar was packed in a sterile plastic bag and stored at 4°C until the ana­lysis. Total carbon (TC) and total nitrogen (TN) were assessed using an NC analyzer (SUMIGRAPH NC-220F; Sumika Chemical Analysis Service). The volumetric water content was analyzed manually by drying the soil sample in an oven set at 105°C overnight. A slurry comprising a 1:2.5 mass ratio of the sample to deionized water was used to evaluate soil pH. CS was analyzed as a control.

R. necatrix mycosphere collection, DNA extraction, and meta-amplicon sequencing

Mycospheres of R. necatrix (Rn-M), which consist of the microbiome assembled around the mycelia of R. necatrix, were recovered from mycelial toothpicks after the incubation in the tested soil, as shown in Supplementary Fig. S2. In brief, after an incubation at 23°C for 4‍ ‍weeks, mycelial toothpicks were pulled out and loose soil particles were removed by shaking the device. Soil particles that adhered tightly to mycelial toothpicks were stripped off with sterile forceps. All stripped soils from the same box were mixed in a sterile plastic bag and stored at –20°C until DNA extraction. Since the strongest antagonism against R. necatrix was observed in S1 soil, only Rn-M microbial communities associated with S1 soil were subsequently analyzed. Additionally, two boxes without mycelial toothpicks, one containing biochar-amended S1-soil and the other containing biochar-free S1-soil, were incubated during the same period of the soil antagonism evaluation, and the microbial communities in the two boxes were analyzed as negative controls for Rn-M. Therefore, we ultimately analyzed 14 samples: six for Rn-M in BS (W97-M in BS×3 and W563-M in BS×3), six for Rn-M in CS (W97-M in CS×3 and W563-M in CS×3), one for BS without exogenous R. necatrix (Rn-free BS×1), and one for CS without exogenous R. necatrix (Rn-free CS×1).

In each sample, total DNA was extracted from 0.5‍ ‍g of soil using a NucleoSpin Soil Kit (Macherey-Nagel) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration and purity of genomic DNA were measured using a Qubit® 2.0 fluorometer (Life Technologies) with a dsDNA HS Assay kit (Life Technologies) and NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometry (NanoDrop Technologies). The primer set of ITS3-2024F (5′-GCATCGATGAAGAACGCAGC-3′) and ITS4-2409R (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′) was used to target the fungal ITS2 region (White et al., 1990). Primers 515F (5′-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3′) and 806R (5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′) were used to amplify the V4 hypervariable regions of the prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene (Caporaso et al., 2011). Library construction and amplicon sequencing were conducted using an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform by Novogene Japan (Novogene). Sequencing was performed to generate >50,000 and >100,000 paired-end tags (2×250 bp) per sample for the fungal ITS2 and prokaryotic 16S rRNA V4 regions, respectively.

Bioinformatics ana­lyses

After removing the adaptors and primer sequences, raw reads were assembled for each sample according to a unique barcode using QIIME 2 (Bolyen et al., 2019). Paired-end reads for each sample were merged using FLASH v2.2.00 with default settings, except for a quality cut-off of 30 (Magoč and Salzberg, 2011). The sequences obtained for all samples were processed using the Mothur pipeline reported by Guo et al. (2014) with minor modifications. Briefly, sequences containing ambiguous bases and those shorter than 200 bp or homopolymer lengths longer than 8 bp were discarded. The qualified sequences were denoised using the ‘pre.cluster’ command, followed by the removal of chimera using the ‘chimera.vsearch’ command in Mothur. The remaining sequences were assigned to operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with a 97% identity threshold using the OptiClust clustering method (Westcott and Schloss, 2017). Fungal OTUs were classified using UNITE database v9 (Kõljalg et al., 2013), and prokaryotic OTUs were annotated against RDP database v18 (Wang et al., 2007) using the RDP classifier in Mothur with an 80% confidence threshold (Schloss et al., 2009). The fungal OTUs assigned to R. necatrix were trimmed, and the remaining fungal composition was defined as the fungal community of R. necatrix mycospheres.

We assessed the diversity and structure of the microbial community using 1,000-time-repeated random subsampling at the size of the smallest fungal and prokaryotic libraries. The OTU count (i.e., observed species number), Shannon–Wiener index, and Chao1 richness were calculated at a 0.03 cut-off level to assess fungal and prokaryotic diversities. A pairwise distance matrix was established for fungal and prokaryotic communities using Bray–Curtis dissimilarities, and a principal coordinate ana­lysis (PCoA) was performed on distance matrices to visualize the communities in two-dimensional scattergrams. An ana­lysis of mole­cular variance (AMOVA) was conducted to estimate significant differences in the community structure of Rn-M in BS and CS. Additionally, the linear discriminant ana­lysis effect size (LEfSe) was used to identify differentially abundant OTUs between Rn-M in BS and CS (Segata et al., 2011). The threshold used for the logarithmic linear discriminant ana­lysis (LDA) score was 2.0, and significance was set at P<0.05 using the Wilcoxon test.

Statistical ana­lysis

The Student’s t-test was performed to evaluate significant differences in soil physicochemical properties, except for the water content, length of the R. necatrix extinction zone, and microbial diversity indices, whereas Fisher’s exact test was used to examine significant differences in the disease score of white root rot in the pots. The water content was represented using a percentage and, thus, the significance of differences in the water content between soils with and without biochar was exami­ned by the Mann–Whitney U test. Significance was defined as P<0.05. Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients were used to evaluate linear and monotonic relationships between the length of the R. necatrix extinction zone and soil physicochemical properties as well as the relationships between the extinction zone and Rn-M microbial indicators (OTU count, Shannon–Wiener index, Chao1 richness, PCoA1, and PCoA2). Pearson’s correlation coefficients were also calculated to identify the major fungal and prokaryotic OTUs in Rn-M correlating with the length of the extinction zone, that is, soil antagonism against R. necatrix. All statistical ana­lyses were performed in R platform v4.3.0 (available at https://www.r-project.org/), and correlation ana­lyses were conducted using the R packages ‘Hmics v5.1-2’ and ‘Matrix v1.5-4’.

Sequence accession numbers

All raw read data were deposited in the DDBJ Sequence Read Archive (DRA) database under the accession numbers DRA018799 and DRA018800 for prokaryotic 16SV4 and fungal ITS2 reads, respectively. These data are available upon reasonable request.

Results

Antagonism against R. necatrix in BS

Six soil samples collected from four Japanese pear orchards with different locations, sampling times, management, and undergrowth vegetation types were evaluated for the effects of the biochar amendment on soil antagonism against the phytopathogenic fungus R. necatrix using two well-studied stains, W97 and W563, in Japan. The results obtained are summarized in Table 1. Although the evaluation showed a broad range of antagonism against R. necatrix for the different samples, the R. necatrix extinction zone was shorter in all tested BS than in the control (i.e., the corresponding CS). A significant decrease in the R. necatrix extinction zone was observed for eight pairs of comparisons (the Student’s t-test, P<0.05), accounting for 66.7% of observations using the toothpick method. These results clearly indicate that soil antagonism against R. necatrix decreased when 20% (v/v) of pruned branch biochar was mixed into the soil.

Table 1.

Antagonism against Rosellinia necatrix (Rn) in orchard soils amended with 20% of pruned branch biochar.

Soil sample,
Orchard name, vegetation type, sampling time
Rn strain Length of extinction zone (mm)a
Biochar-amended Control P valueb
S1,
Tsukuba-A, low grass cover, May 2023
W97 10.0±2.8 14.5±3.0 0.133
W563 3.1±1.8 9.0±2.8 0.046 *
S2,
Tsukuba-A, low grass cover, July 2023
W97 1.1±0.5 4.6±0.7 0.004 **
W563 0.3±0.1 1.4±0.2 0.009 **
S3,
Tsukuba-B1, low grass cover, October 2023
W97 0.8±0.7 2.3±0.9 0.111
W563 0.0±0.1 0.6±0.1 0.061
S4,
Tsukuba-B2, high grass cover, October 2023
W97 0.1±0.1 3.5±1.5 0.037 *
W563 0.1±0.1 2.5±0.4 0.001 **
S5,
Tsukuba-C, no grass cover, October 2023
W97 3.7±2.4 9.9±2.4 0.008 **
W563 2.3±0.7 6.5±2.3 0.075
S6,
Chiba, no grass cover, August 2023
W97 0.3±0.2 2.8±0.7 0.021 *
W563 0.3±0.3 1.4±0.2 0.039 *

a Data for the length of the extinction zone in R. necatrix mycelial toothpicks represent the mean and standard deviation of triplicate measurements.

b Significant differences between the biochar-amended and control groups were exami­ned with a given comparison (the Student’s t-test: * P<0.05; ** P<0.01).

Disease severity of white root rot in BS

According to expectations from observations using the toothpick method, the disease scores of both Rn-inoculated mung and apple plants were higher in pots with BS (Table 2). Regarding R. necatrix W97, a significant difference in disease severity between pots with and without the biochar amendment was observed for both plant species (Fisher’s exact test, P<0.05). These results further revealed that white root rot was stimulated when 20% (v/v) pruned branch biochar was mixed into the soil.

Table 2.

Disease severity of white root rot in orchard soils amended with 20% of pruned branch biochar.

Experiment Rosellinia necatrix (Rn) strain Disease severitya of white root rot in the tested plant
Mung seedlingb Apple plantc
Biochar-amended Control P valued Biochar-amended Control P valued
Repeat 1 W97 1.9±0.4 0.2±0.1 <0.001 *** 3.0±0.0 0.8±0.5 0.028 *
W563 3.0±0.0 1.9±0.3 <0.001 *** 2.8±0.2 2.5±0.3 1.000
Repeat 2 W97 1.9±0.3 0.3±0.1 <0.001 *** 2.7±0.2 2.0±0.5 1.000
W563 0.7±0.1 0.1±0.1 0.001 ** 3.0±0.0 2.8±0.2 1.000

a Disease severity is estimated using the disease scores rated as follows: 0, healthy; 1, wilting of <50% leaves; 2, wilting of ≥50% leaves; 3, entirely withered and dead.

b Data for mung represent the mean and standard error (SE) of 14 tested seedlings at 11 days post-inoculation (dpi).

c Data for apple represent the mean and SE of 6 tested plants at 38 dpi.

d Significant differences between the biochar-amended and control groups were exami­ned with a given comparison (Fisher’s exact test: * P<0.05; ** P<0.01; *** P<0.001).

Relationships between soil physicochemical properties and antagonism against R. necatrix

TC, TN, the water content, and pH were assessed in BS and CS to evaluate antagonism against R. necatrix. The amendment with 20% (v/v) biochar significantly increased soil TC and pH (the Student’s t-test, P<0.01) (Table 3). Although TN also significantly differed between soils with and without biochar, the range of the change in TN was small and inconsistent (Table 3). The relationships between soil physicochemical properties and antagonism against R. necatrix were further estimated (data not shown); however, only pH negatively correlated with the length of the Rn extinction zone (Pearson’s R=–0.48, P=0.02; Spearman’s R=–0.51, P=0.01).

Table 3.

Physicochemical properties of orchard soils amended with 20% of pruned branch biochar.

Soil sample, orchard name, vegetation type, and sampling time TC (g kg–1)a TN (g kg–1)a Water content (%)b pHc
Biochar-amended Control P valued Biochar-amended Control P valued Biochar-amended Control P valuee Biochar-amended Control P valued
S1,
Tsukuba-A, low grass cover, May 2023
101.5±6.4 51.4±0.3 0.005** 4.4±0.1 3.9±0.0 0.005** 26.9±0.8 38.1±0.2 0.100 6.60±0.05 5.25±0.05 <0.001***
S2,
Tsukuba-A, low grass cover, July 2023
84.4±1.2 48.4±0.3 <0.001*** 4.1±0.1 3.7±0.0 0.001** 38.1±0.5 40.6±0.7 0.100 7.58±0.17 5.92±0.01 0.004**
S3,
Tsukuba-B1, low grass cover, October 2023
84.5±5.1 34.1±0.2 0.007** 3.5±0.1 2.9±0.0 0.003** ND ND NA 7.00 5.41 NA
S4,
Tsukuba-B2, high grass cover, October 2023
76.0±2.6 33.7±1.5 0.003** 3.3±0.0 2.9±0.2 <0.001*** ND ND NA 6.95 5.15 NA
S5,
Tsukuba-C, no grass cover, October 2023
123.5±6.3 49.4±0.9 <0.001*** 4.9±0.0 4.3±0.1 0.035* ND ND NA 7.28 5.42 NA
S6,
Chiba, no grass cover, August 2023
76.5±4.9 45.1±0.6 0.002** 4.1±0.1 3.7±0.1 0.006** 33.8±1.2 35.5±0.8 0.100 7.22±0.08 5.42±0.07 <0.001***

a Data for TC and TN represent the mean and standard deviation (SD) of triplicate measurements.

b Data for the water content of samples S1, S2, and S6 represent the mean and SD of triplicate measurements. ND means ‘not determined’.

c Data for the pH of samples S1, S2, and S6 represent the mean and SD of triplicate measurements, and those for samples S3, S4, and S5 represent a single measurement.

d Significant differences between the biochar-amended and control groups were exami­ned with a given comparison (the Student’s t-test: * P<0.05; ** P<0.01; *** P<0.001). NA means ‘not available’.

e Significant differences between the biochar-amended and control groups were exami­ned with a given comparison (the Mann-Whitney U test: * P<0.05). NA means ‘not available’.

Microbial community diversity and structure of R. necatrix mycosphere in biochar

Due to the relatively high antagonism estimated for S1 soil, an investigation of the microbial community in the soil was expected to reveal the biotic indicators responsible for the antagonistic potential. Regarding the closest association with R. necatrix, soil microbial communities around the mycelial toothpicks, that is, Rn-M communities, were analyzed using a culture-independent approach. Fungal and prokaryotic OTU counts, Chao1 richness, and Shanno–Wiener indices are summarized in Table 4. Approximately 300–390 fungal and 3,400–4,800 prokaryotic OTUs were detected in Rn-M communities. In comparisons with Rn-free communities, only fungal OTU counts were markedly lower. Similar results were observed in Chao 1 richness and Shannon–Wiener indices. No significant difference in microbial diversity was observed between Rn-M communities with and without biochar, expect for the fungal Shannon–Wiener index of the W97 mycosphere community, which was significantly higher in BS (the Student’s t-test, P<0.01).

Table 4.

Fungal and prokaryotic diversities of Rosellinia necatrix (Rn) mycosphere communities in orchard soils amended with 20% of pruned branch biochar.

Diversity indexa Rn strain Fungi Bacteria
Biochar-amended Control P valueb Biochar-amended Control P valueb
OTU count W97 376±10 338±36 0.322 4328±271 4192±194 0.521
W563 355±19 341±1 0.207 4071±616 4250±456 0.708
Rn-free 1013 1005 N.A. 4195 4638 N.A.
Chao1 richness W97 1177±119 1249±72 0.589 6294±390 6094±364 0.552
W563 1166±4 1247±220 0.435 6158±1332 6310±1094 0.886
Rn-free 1973 1794 N.A. 6113 7140 N.A.
Shannon–Wiener index W97 2.28±0.20 1.94±0.18 0.001** 6.01±0.19 5.93±0.10 0.539
W563 2.16±0.06 1.71±0.07 0.088 5.46±0.87 5.90±0.07 0.477
Rn-free 3.58 3.72 N.A. 6.17 6.02 N.A.

a Diversity data for R. necatrix mycosphere communities represent the mean and standard deviation of triplicate measurements, and those for Rn-free samples represent a single measurement.

b Significant differences between the biochar-amended and control groups were exami­ned with a given comparison (the Student’s t-test: * P<0.05; ** P<0.01). N.A. means ‘not available’.

As shown by the PCoA plots in Fig. 1, the fungal communities of Rn-M in BS were clearly separate from those of Rn-M in CS and Rn-free soils (AMOVA, Fs=14.05, P<0.001). Similar results were observed for prokaryotic communities; however, the difference (AMOVA, Fs=3.46, P<0.001) was less than that in fungal communities. In addition, the prokaryotic community in the W563-mycoshere highly varied among individual samples, suggesting that specific prokaryotes occasionally inhabited the W563 mycosphere.

Fig. 1.

Principle coordinate ana­lysis (PCoA) of fungal (left) and prokaryotic (right) community structures in the mycosphere of Rosellinia necatrix (Rn-M) in soils with and without biochar. Two-dimensional plots are generated according to Bray–Curtis dissimilarities based on 97% identity operational taxonomic units. An ana­lysis of mole­cular variance (AMOVA) was performed to estimate significant differences in the community structure of Rn-M between soils with and without biochar. A non-parametric fixation index (Fs) >1 indicates that the compared communities are significantly different. ▲, W97-M in BS; ●, W563-M in BS; ◆, Rn-free BS; △, W97-M in CS; ○, W563-M in CS; ◇, Rn-free CS.

Taxonomic composition of Rn-M communities

The taxonomic compositions of 846,875 fungal ITS sequences and 2,030,983 prokaryotic 16S-V4 sequences across the 14 samples were analyzed. In the fungal ITS ana­lysis, a single OTU classified as R. necatrix was the most abundant fungus in samples, accounting for 9 to 57% of all ITS reads generated from samples that adhered to the mycelial toothpicks (data not shown); however, it was not detected in Rn-free samples. After removing the R. necatrix OTU, the remaining fungal OTUs were designed as fungal communities in Rn-M. The fungal communities in Rn-M were dominated by a single phylum, Asocomycota, with a major class of Sordariomycetes (Fig. 2). In comparisons with the fungal communities of Rn-M in CS, the Ascomycota class Eurotiomycetes was more abundant in Rn-M in BS (Fig. 2). In contrast, the prokaryotic communities of Rn-M mainly comprised five bacterial phyla: Proteobacteria (major classes of Alpha-, Beta-, Gamma-, and Delta-Proteobacteria), Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Verrucomicrobia, as well as two archaeal phyla, Thaumachaeota and Euryarchaeota (Fig. 2). Moreover, the bacterial phylum Firmicutes was more abundant in W563-M in BS (Fig. 2). However, this percentage was mainly derived from a single OTU belonging to the genus Listeria in two individual samples of W563-M in BS (data not shown). Additionally, unclassified bacteria and taxa of Acidobacteria, Dothideomycetes, and Basidiomycota were more abundant in Rn-free soils (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

The relative abundance of fungal (upper) and prokaryotic (lower) taxa in the mycosphere community of Rosellinia necatrix in soils with and without biochar. Bar plots of relative abundance for R. necatrix (Rn) mycosphere communities (W97-M and W563-M) in soils with and without biochar represent the mean values of taxonomic units of triplicate measurements, and those for Rn-free communities represent a single measurement.

We used LEfSe to detect the relationship between fungal and prokaryotic OTUs in Rn-M with BS and CS. Twenty-four fungal OTUs and 66 prokaryotic OTUs were more abundant in Rn-M in BS, whereas 7 fungal OTUs and 51 prokaryotic OTUs were more prevalent in Rn-M in CS (Table S1). Regarding major OTUs with an absolute LDA score >3 (Fig. 3), 9 fungal OTUs and 5 prokaryotic OTUs were more abundant in Rn-M in BS, whereas 4 fungal OTUs and 13 prokaryotic OTUs were more abundant in Rn-M in‍ ‍CS. The fungal OTUs more abundant in Rn-M in BS were identified as the taxa of Phialophora cyclaminis, Clonostachys, Fusarium, Geminibasidium, Mortierellaceae, Nectriaceae, and Didymellaceae, whereas those more abundant in Rn-M in CS were Dictychaeta lithocarpi, Trichoderma, and Chaetomiaceae. Moreover, the prokaryotic OTUs that were more abundant in Rn-M in BS were identified as the taxa‍ ‍Dokdonella, Variovorax, Niastella, Geothrix, and Rhodanobacter, whereas those more abundant in Rn-M in‍ ‍CS were Paraburkholderia, Nitrosophaera, Pseudoduganella, Polyangiaceae, Acidobacteria Gp2, and unclassified bacteria.

Fig. 3.

Histograms of logarithmic linear discriminant ana­lysis (LDA) scores calculated for differentially abundant fungal (upper) and prokaryotic (lower) OTUs in the mycosphere community of Rosellinia necatrix (Rn-M) between soils with and without biochar. Linear discriminant ana­lysis effect size (LEfSe) was performed with the datasets of fungal and prokaryotic OTUs in Rn-M communities, i.e., six Rn-M communities in soils with biochar and six without biochar. Significantly abundant OTUs with LDA scores >3.0 are shown in the histograms. Heatmaps show the relative abundance of each selected OTU in different soil or mycosphere samples. The heatmaps for Rn-M communities (W97-M and W563-M) in soils with and without biochar represent the mean values of triplicate measurements, and those for Rn-free communities represent a single measurement.

Relationships between microbial indicators and antagonism against R. necatrix

Microbial indicators involved in diversity and community structures were estimated for linear and monotonic correlations with the soil antagonism of R. necatrix (Table 5). Notably, fungal Shannon–Wiener diversity (Pearson’s R=–‍0.66, P=0.020; Spearman’s R=–0.66, P=0.018) and fungal PCoA2 (Pearson’s R=–‍0.63, P=0.028; Spearman’s R=–‍0.62, P=0.033) negatively correlated with antagonism against R. necatrix, whereas fungal PCoA1 (Pearson’s R=0.83, P=0.001; Spearman’s R=0.78, P=0.003) positively correlated with this antagonism. In addition, prokaryotic PCoA1 (Pearson’s R=–0.60, P=0.038) and PCoA2 (Spearman’s R=–0.61, P=0.036) showed negative linear and monotonic relationships with antagonism, respectively.

Table 5.

Linear and monotonic relationshipsa between microbial indicators of the Rosellinia necatrix mycosphere and the length of the extinction zone.

R. necatrix mycosphere microbial indicators Linear correlations Monotonic correlations
R value P valueb R value P valueb
Fungal OTU count –0.48 0.117 –0.35 0.272
Fungal Shannon-Wiener index –0.66 0.020* –0.66 0.018*
Fungal Chao1 richness 0.22 0.491 0.12 0.721
Fungal structure (PCoA1) 0.83 0.001** 0.78 0.003**
Fungal structure (PCoA2) –0.63 0.028* –0.62 0.033*
Prokaryotic OTU count 0.05 0.883 0.09 0.778
Prokaryotic Shannon-Wiener index 0.29 0.364 –0.08 0.795
Prokaryotic Chao1 richness –0.06 0.857 0.20 0.527
Prokaryotic structure (PCoA1) –0.60 0.038* –0.46 0.130
Prokaryotic structure (PCoA2) –0.52 0.084 –0.61 0.036*

a Linear and monotonic relationships were estimated using Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlations, respectively.

b Correlations were exami­ned using Holm’s method at * P<0.05 and ** P<0.01.

Furthermore, we used Pearson’s linear regression to evaluate the relationship between the length of the Rn extinction zone and major bacterial and fungal OTUs in Rn-M (Fig. 4 and Table S2). The relative abundance of fungal OTU0001 (Chaetomiaceae) and –0010 (Trichoderma) and those of prokaryotic OTU00004 (unclassified bacterium), –00006 (Nitrosomonadales), –00007 (unclassified bacterium), and –‍00010 (unclassified bacterium) positively correlated (P<0.05) with antagonism against R. necatrix. Conversely, the relative abundance of fungal OTU0006 (Mortierellaceae) and –‍0009 (Nectriaceae), and that of prokaryotic OTU00046 (Rhodanobacteraceae) negatively correlated (P<0.05) with the Rn extinction zone.

Fig. 4.

Linear regression relationship between specific OTUs and the extinction zone of Rosellinia necatrix in mycelial toothpicks. Correlations (P<0.05) are indicated with a linear regression curve in the plot. The taxonomy of each selected fungal OTU is identified as follows: OTU0001, Chaetomiaceae; OTU0005, Phialophora cyclaminis; OTU0006, Mortierellaceae; OTU0009, Nectriaceae; OTU0010, Trichoderma; OTU0012, Dictyochaeta lithocarpi. The taxonomy of each selected prokaryotic OTU is identified as follows: OTU00004, unclassified bacterium; OTU00006, Nitrosomonadales; OTU00007, unclassified bacterium; OTU00010, unclassified bacterium; OTU00041, Dokdonella; OTU00046, Rhodanobacteraceae. ▲, W97-M in BS; ●, W563-M in BS; △, W97-M in CS; ○, W563-M in CS.

Discussion

The application of biochar to soils suppresses soil-borne diseases caused by fungal phytopathogens, such as Fusarium spp. and R. solani (Poveda et al., 2021; Iacomino et al., 2022; Yang et al., 2022; Arshad et al., 2024); however, the effects of biochar on the control of the white root rot fungus R. necatrix remain unclear. In the present study, we exami­ned soil antagonism against R. necatrix in BS. By using the toothpick method, a simple assessment approach (Takahashi and Nakamura, 2020), we found that the extinction zone of R. necatrix in the mycelial toothpick, i.e., soil antagonism against R. necatrix, significantly decreased when 20% (v/v) of pruned branch biochar was amended in orchard soils. This result was further confirmed by the increased disease severity of white root rot in mung and apple plants cultivated in BS. Therefore, in contrast to previous findings, the present results revealed a conducive effect of the biochar amendment on white root rot disease.

The physicochemical features of soil were further analyzed to clarify the abiotic factors driving soil antagonism against R. necatrix. The biochar amendment significantly increased TC, TN, and pH in soil, whereas only pH negatively correlated with antagonism. Under natural conditions, R. necatrix infects host plants in soils with pH between 6 and 8 (Pérez-Jiménez, 2006). In the present study, the biochar amendment neutralized soil pH from 5.2~6.0 to 6.6~7.6, appearing to create a favorable acid-base environment for the pathogen. In addition, low soil aeration was unfavorable for the disease occurrence of R. necatrix (Pliego et al., 2012), whereas a previous study showed that a 5–10% biochar amendment increased soil aeration (Case et al., 2012). Therefore, a biochar amendment may improve gas-phase conditions, namely, the availability of oxygen in soil, to the benefit of R. necatrix attacks.

Microbial competition between pathogens and surrounding soil microbes is important for disease development (Snelders et al., 2020), whereas antagonistic bacteria and fungi are key players in the suppression of R. necatrix (Arjona-López et al., 2019b; Takahashi et al., 2020). In the present study, we characterized the microbial communities of R. necatrix mycospheres associated with the biochar amendment. The results obtained showed no significant differences in the microbial diversity or phylum composition of R. necatrix mycosphere communities. Sordariomycetes dominated the fungal communities of R. necatrix mycosphere in soils with and without biochar, whereas prokaryotic communities comprised Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Verrucomicrobia, Thaumachaeota, Euryarchaeota, and unclassified bacteria. This phylum-based taxonomic composition is similar to that of two other soil-borne disease fungi, Fusarium oxysporum (Sun et al., 2021; Thomas and Antony-Babu, 2024) and Verticillium dahliae (Batista et al., 2024), suggesting that soil-borne pathogenic fungi recruit a similar subset from the soil microbiome to form a pathobiome. Nevertheless, fungal and prokaryotic communities in R. necatrix mycosphere varied in structure at the OTU level (≥97% identity) in relation to the biochar amendment.

LEfSe revealed specific microbial groups associated with R. necatrix mycosphere in BS. In comparisons with CS, the fungal OTUs affiliated with Phialophora, Clonostachys, Fusarium, Geminibasidium, Mortierellaceae, Nectriaceae, and Didymellaceae were more abundant in the pathogen mycosphere of BS. Many species belonging to Phialophora, Fusarium, Nectriaceae, and Didymellaceae are opportunistic or phytopathogens (Kondo et al., 2007; Aveskamp et al., 2010; Aoki et al., 2014), whereas those associated with Clonostachys and Mortierellaceae have suppressive potential against plant diseases (Sun et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2022). However, the specific roles of these fungal groups warrant further study with respect to the disease development of R. necatrix. Among prokaryotes, the percentage of OTUs affiliated with Dokdonella, Variovorax, Niastella, Geothrix, and Rhodanobacter was enriched in the pathogen mycosphere of BS. The growth of these bacterial groups prefers an optimal pH range of 6.5~7.5 (Yoon et al., 2006a, 2006b; Cho et al., 2017; Akter et al., 2021; Itoh et al., 2023). Due to the higher pH in BS, the change in the R. necatrix mycosphere community appears to be linked to the increased soil pH.

In our attempt to link the microbial indicators of the mycosphere community with antagonism against R. necatrix, correlation ana­lyses showed that the R. necatrix extinction zone in the mycelial toothpick appeared to be associated with fungal and prokaryotic community structures. Our results further suggest that several specific microbial groups present in R. necatrix mycosphere increases alongside antagonistic potential. The R. necatrix extinction zone significantly increased as the abundance of Chaetomiaceae and Trichoderma became higher, suggesting that these groups possess antagonistic potential against R. necatrix. These results are consistent with previous findings showing the usability of these fungi as biocontrol agents against soil-borne pathogenic fungi, such as Fusarium spp., V. dahliae, and R. necatrix (Carrero-Carrón et al., 2016; Madbouly and Abdel-Wareth, 2020; Takahashi et al., 2020; Kumari et al., 2022). Regarding prokaryotes, the relative abundance of some unclassified bacteria positively correlated with the antagonistic potential, indicating that some unidentified bacteria contribute to the control of R. necatrix. However, the percentages of these fungal and bacterial groups with antagonistic potential decreased at different levels in R. necatrix mycosphere in BS, which may be attributed to shifts in the soil microenvironment and pathogen vigor. An increasing number of studies have revealed that soil-borne pathogenic fungi release various biomolecules to target the immune system of the host plant and selectively manipulate the local microbiome during host-infecting and soil-dwelling life stages (Snelders et al., 2020; Snelders et al., 2021). To date, dozens of genes encoding antimicrobial effector proteins have been identified in the genome of R. necatrix, some of which are expressed to inhibit antagonistic bacteria during host colonization (Chavarro-Carrero et al., 2024). The present results revealed a marked decline in soil antagonism against white root rot disease in BS, which may be partially explained by the selective exclusion of antagonists from the mycosphere community by R. necatrix.

In addition, several specific microbial groups enriched in R. necatrix mycosphere negatively correlated with the antagonistic potential, which mainly included fungi affiliated with Phialophora, Mortierellaceae, and Nectriaceae and bacteria affiliated with Dokdonella and Rhodanobacteraceae. This result suggests that low antagonism against R. necatrix in BS was also associated with an increased abundance of other co-generic species; however, the specific roles of these microbes in promoting white root rot disease warrant further study. Based on the present results showing differences between BS and CS with respect to antagonism against R. necatrix and microbial communities in the pathogen mycosphere, the development of a synthesized approach for the prevention and control of R. necatrix that is adapted to the carbon-sinking cultivation system with pruned branch biochar is needed. Future studies are required to focus on enhancing the suppression of R. necatrix in BS, particularly by enriching indigenous antagonists or exogenously supplying biocontrol agents.

Previous studies detected and quantified R. necatrix in orchard soils using culture-based and mole­cular methods. However, it is typically detectable in infested orchards (Shishido et al., 2012; Arjona-López et al., 2019a; Hartley et al., 2022), particularly close to the trunk (Eguchi et al., 2009). The spread of R. necatrix in soil is mainly dependent on the mycelial colonization of healthy roots from adjacent diseased roots through direct root contact between host plants (Pliego et al., 2012). Additionally, R. necatrix isolates recovered from diseased roots show higher virulence than those recovered from the soil (Ikeda et al., 2005). These findings imply that the proper management of root-associated soil may be important for the efficient prevention of white root rot in orchards. Although the present study showed that the biochar amendment decreased soil antagonism against R. necatrix to some extent, the results obtained also indicate that R. necatrix did not grow using pruned branch biochar as a nutrient source (Supplementary Fig. S3). Therefore, the disease may be controlled if biochar is applied to an appropriate location without the root system of the fruit tree. We suggest applying pruned branch biochar to soil away from the tree trunk at a distance far from root-associated soil, which will avoid increasing the risk of white root rot in orchards. In addition, prior to the application of biochar, the detection and quantification of R. necatrix in the targeted orchard is required to decide whether to consider the use of biochar.

Conclusion

We showed that soil antagonism against the white root rot fungus R. necatrix decreased in soils amended with 20% (v/v) biochar. Soil pH was neutralized and aeration was promoted by the biochar amendment, which may be favorable for disease occurrence. An investigation of microbial communities surrounding R. necatrix mycelia indicated that the antagonistic fungi affiliated with Chaetomiaceae and Trichoderma were selectively excluded from the mycosphere community in BS. Therefore, we propose that the enrichment of these indigenous antagonistic fungi may be particularly important for controlling white root rot in BS. Further studies enhancing the environmental adaptation of the soil microbiome may open new avenues for the development of information-based biocontrol strategies for R. necatrix that are suitable for carbon-sinking cultivation systems. We do not recommend the application of pruned branch biochar to the soil area associated with the roots of fruit trees in order to avoid increasing the risk of white root rot in orchards.

Citation

Guo, Y., Horii, S., and Kanematsu, S. (2024) Evaluation of Soil Antagonism against the White Root Rot Fungus Rosellinia necatrix and Pathogen Mycosphere Communities in Biochar-amended Soil. Microbes Environ 39: ME24060.

https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.ME24060

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Hitoshi Nakamura for his technical assistance with the experiments. We also thank Mr. Masayoshi Oshida and Mr. Natsuki Kaneko for their assistance with sample collection. This study was supported by the Green Innovation Fund Projects of the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO), Japan.

References
 
© 2024 by Japanese Society of Microbial Ecology / Japanese Society of Soil Microbiology / Taiwan Society of Microbial Ecology / Japanese Society of Plant Microbe Interactions / Japanese Society for Extremophiles.

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons [Attribution 4.0 International] license.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
feedback
Top