Journal of Japanese Society of Oral Implantology
Online ISSN : 2187-9117
Print ISSN : 0914-6695
ISSN-L : 0914-6695
Original Papers
Effect of Prosthetic Form in the Maxilla on Mandibular Cortical Width
Shogo KANDAYuji EHARAYoshiyuki ONISHIAkihiko KUWABARANaoto MATSUKIAkiyoshi YAMAGAMI
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2019 Volume 32 Issue 1 Pages 43-47

Details
Abstract

Objectives : In this study, we investigated the influence of differences of prosthetic mode of maxillary molars on the thickness of mandibular cortical bone.

Subjects and Methods : The subjects were women aged 45 years or older who agreed to this research by January 2017 in two branches of our research institute, with healthy lower jaw dentition, and a fixed-type prosthesis or implant-supporting prosthetic device. The mandibular cortical width (MCW) with respect to the difference in prosthetic mode on each side of the maxilla was measured using a computer aided diagnostic system (CAD) on a panoramic X-ray photograph.

Results : The subjects were 90 women aged 45 to 90 with an average age of 67.4 years. The target prostheses were 135 fixed-type prostheses and 22 restorative prostheses for each side on maxillary molars The 135 cases of fixed-type prostheses included 56 fixed prostheses and 79 implant support prostheses in the mandibular molars. On the other hand, the 22 restorative prostheses were 18 fixed prostheses and 4 implant-supported prostheses in the mandibular molars.

The average MCW was 3.84 mm for the fixed-type prostheses and 3.63 mm for the implant-supported prostheses, both decreasing with age. The MCW for the prosthetic mode of the maxillary molars was as follows. The average MCW of the 135 fixed-type prostheses was 3.70 mm, which showed a decrease with age. The average MCW of the 22 restorative prostheses was 3.14 mm, which showed a decrease with age like the fixed prostheses.

Conclusion : The loss of teeth in the maxilla and mandible affected MCW, and the MCW decreased with age. It is suggested that the occlusal force had an influence on MCW.

Content from these authors
© 2019 Japanese Society of Oral Implantology
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top