Journal of Japanese Society of Oral Implantology
Online ISSN : 2187-9117
Print ISSN : 0914-6695
ISSN-L : 0914-6695
A Case Report about Mobility of Implants by PERIO TEST
Part 2.SUMICIKON's PERIO TEST Values, Distinctions of Sex and Age
Hiroki MurakamiTetsuo MatsudaTamisuke KishiMasanori NashimotoTomohiko KatoUtena Tsunosue
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

1991 Volume 4 Issue 2 Pages 221-230

Details
Abstract
Last year, we reported about mobility of implants by PERIO TEST(Part.1). We took many measurements of SUMICIKON implants with PERIO TEST (PT) by the same method. PT revealed us a relation between in implant and a bone, which had many objective and quantitative results for us at chairside. We had some interesting results that distinguished of sex and age.
Those results were as follows:
1. The distinction of sex(male; n=20, female; n=19)Before this examination, we felt better results on the male in clinical situation. But the result was proved not to be distinction of sex. SUMICIKON is a“ Bio-integrated implant type”, has a transmit ability of a bone by HAP. That fact was, the distinction of sex<“Bio-integrated effect.
2. The distinction of age(a.35~44 years old;n=9,b.45~54 years old;n=16, 55 years old~;n=14) We classed 3 generations of age. We researched about PT value influences of genontology, specially about the aged of females who became osteoporosis after amemorrhea. But the result proved not to be a distinction of age.
Content from these authors
© 1991 Japanese Society of Oral Implantology
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top