Journal of Japanese Society of Oral Implantology
Online ISSN : 2187-9117
Print ISSN : 0914-6695
ISSN-L : 0914-6695
Statistical Study of SUMICIKON and Bonefit,about Availability of Connecting to Natural Teeth
Hiroki MurakamiYutaka NishijimaOsamu OkamotoRyuhei EndoRyuichi YamamotoToru HirataHideki Sasaki
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

1993 Volume 6 Issue 2 Pages 237-242

Details
Abstract

Purpose: The prosthetic methods for implantation, 1. connection method of implant and natural teeth abutments and 2. independent method-using implant abutment only, are thought to be determined by various conditions of the defective part in general-use implant types. We researched statisticaly SUMICIKON's and Bonefit's PERIO TEST data on effectiveness of connection to natural teeth.
Method: We measured (average and standard deviation) from just after operation to 600 days after implantation. And we measured natural molar teeth which were used as controls.
Result: 1. natural teeth: 6.93 (n=132 persons × 4 type teeth × 4 blocks=2112, S.D.=0.87) 1) first premolar: 5.83, 2) second premolar: 7.06, 3)first molar: 5.92, 4)second molar: 8.93
2. Implant (n=247): 1)SUMICIKON:6.00 (n=42, S.D.=0.94), 2)Bonefit: 0.36 (n=205, S.D.=0.66)
Consideration:1. Natural teeth connecting bone growth and implant bone growth conditions and 2. adjacent and antagonistic teeth conditions are thought to be most important for Perio Test values related to connection and independent methods for natural teeth. This time we took 1. into consideration.
In case 2 molars are defected in blade-type implant, Bonefit prosthetic method for wide clinical application is generally the method for premolar 2-abutment. The desirable connection is thought to be an implant abutment of Perio Test value of 5.83<X<8.93, if the ideal Perio Test value of the implant abutment is X, from the result of natural teeth.
Conclusion: If Perio Test values are limited, 1. SUMICIKON is the optimum implant for the natural teeth-connecting prosthetic method while the stress concentration of the implant neck section is dangerous in natural teeth connection of 2. Bonefit.

Content from these authors
© 1993 Japanese Society of Oral Implantology
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top