Retrospective Study of Surgical Gastrojejunostomy versus Gastroduodenal Stenting for Malignant Gastroduodenal Obstruction

Abstract

Background: We retrospectively compared endscopic gastroduodenal stenting with gastrojejunostomy as a means of palliating malignant gastric and duodenal obstruction. Methods: This retrospective study investigated patients treated for malignant gastric and duodenal obstruction from April 2011 to April 2015 at Shikoku Cancer Center. Results: Of the 40 patients in this study, 25 underwent gastroduodenal stenting and 15 had operative gastrojejunostomy. Comparing the stenting and operative patients, technical success rate was 100% in both group, clinical success rate was 84% in stenting patients and 93% in operative patients. The median time to fluid intake was significantly shorter in stenting patients than operative patients(0 day vs 2 days, p=0.0003), and the median time to intake of solids was also significantly shorter in stenting patients(1day vs 3 days, p<0.0001).The median hospital stay was significantly shorter in stenting patients(9 days vs 23 days, p=0.0116). Median cost of hospitalization is more expensive in operative patients than stenting patients(¥1,106,170 vs ¥752,290, p=0.0052). Conclusion: Our study suggested that gastoroduodenal stent was less length of time to fluid/solid intake, and less costly than gastrojejunostomy.