Abstract
Though the concept of “relevance” is one of the key concepts of Schutz's theory, it seems to be hard to understand to us. One of the reason why seems that he use the concept in various meanings in his various contexts.
First, to analyse his concept of “relevance”, I will try to follow his descriptions.
Second, by summarizing the interpretations given to the concept, I will show the fact that the meaning of his “relevance” could be interpreted into three different meanings as follows :
1. an attribute ascribed by an individual to selected aspects
2. function or action of selection
3. correlation of type or knowledge
Third, regarding “the problem of relevance”, we could consider it as the problem that is to clear many propositions underlining our daily thinking but never appearing in our “natural attitude”. Then, from what points of view did he approach the problem ? We can state that Schutz had two different view points- (1) Phenomenological reflection and (2) (Scientific) observer.
Thus the three different interpretations of his concept of “relevance” become to clear. He used his concept in three different ways corresponding three different viewpoints of (1) natural attitude, (2) phenomenological reflection, and (3) (scientific) observer.
Finally, I will point out the peculiar aspect of “the problem of relevance” and review how we could continue to consider his problem
