Abstract
In Japan, there are two commonly used regulations on respirable dust concentration: the Occupational Exposure Limit (OEL), recommended by the Japan Society for Occupational Health, and the Administrative Control Level (ACL). Both depend on the crystalline silica content in dust. Until 2004, the ACL for respirable dust conformed to the OEL. However, the ACL was revised in 2005 in light of the OEL and the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH)'s Threshold Limit Value (TLV), same value as National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)'s Recommended Exposure Limit (REL). In this paper, the author intends to clarify the stringency of the current ACL by comparing it with the OEL and the ACGIH's TLV. In addition, the effect of the analytical error due to the phosphoric acid method in the current and former ACLs is shown.
