Transformation of the Concept of Responsibility in Human-Artifacts Networks

Abstract

This paper analyzes responsibility in human-artifacts networks from the perspective of “extended mediation theory,” examining new forms of accountability. The traditional concept of autonomy assumes that the consequences of actions can be predicted and controlled. However, human-artifacts networks extend beyond human control in this regard, creating a “responsibility gap.” Therefore, this problem cannot be adequately addressed by the traditional “autonomous individual subject.” Through an analysis of “distributed responsibility” and “relational autonomy,” this paper proposes alternatives such as “responsibility unevenly distributed across the network” and “role-based distribution of responsibility.” It also discusses the need for a normative debate that incorporates a dialogical and critical perspective on this issue.