Abstract
This paper examines the possible conclusion of international conference
of LAWS(Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems) under the
CCW(Convention on prohibitions or restrictions on the use of
certain conventional weapons)
LAWS does not exist yet, and there are on definition about that, but the
negotiation of ban and limitation to use LAWS conducts in international
conference. It goes without saying that it is desirable that LAWS be
regulated to some extent, considering the risk that could arise if it were
to be operated without restriction. Conference of LAWS have achieved
to some extent, with the adoption of 11 Guiding principles as guideline
for domestic operating of LAWS, but there are some difference in that
interpretation of that words between participating nations. Therefore,
nations submitted of that commentaries, which clarified their claims to
certain extent.
This paper clarifies the difference of that interpretations of “human
responsibility”,“meaningful human control” and“accountability”, which
are considered to particularly important elements, and concludes which
is the most appropriate outcome in the conference. And in order to reach
a conclusion, in addition to the principle of like a distinction and
proportionality that have been considered as the principles of the Law
of armed conflict, and how to deal with issue of “ethics” will assume a
key role.
https://ror.org/03tcq6k11 
