Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences
Online ISSN : 1880-2206
Print ISSN : 1347-3182
ISSN-L : 1347-3182
Influence of Gadolinium-based Contrast Media and Inter-reader Variation on the Estimation of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) Parameters in Breast MR Imaging
Barbara J. FuegerRaoul VargaPanagiotis KapetasNina PötschThomas H. HelbichPascal A.T. Baltzer Paola Clauser
著者情報
ジャーナル オープンアクセス 早期公開

論文ID: mp.2023-0131

詳細
抄録

Purpose: Gadolinium-based contrast media (GBCM) may affect apparent diffusion coefficient measurements on diffusion-weighted imaging. We aimed at investigating the effect of GBCM and inter-reader variation on intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) parameters in breast lesions.

Methods: A total of 89 patients referred to 3T breast MRI with at least one histologically verified lesion were included. IVIM data were acquired using a single-shot echo planar imaging sequence before and after GBCM administration. D (true diffusion coefficient), D* (pseudo-diffusion coefficient) and f (perfusion fraction) were calculated and measured by two readers (R1, R2). Inter-reader and intra-reader agreements were assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland–Altman plots.

Results: D was comparable before and after GBCM administration and between readers. D* and f decreased after GBCM administration and showed a lower agreement between readers. Intra-reader agreement before and after GBCM administration was almost perfect for D for both R1 and R2 (ICC 0.955 and 0.887). The intra-reader agreement was substantial to moderate for D* (ICC R1 0.708, R2 0.583) and moderate for f (ICC R1 0.529 and R2 0.425). Inter-reader agreement before GBCM administration was almost perfect for D (ICC 0.905), substantial for D* (ICC 0.733), and moderate for f (ICC 0.404); after contrast media administration, it was almost perfect for D (ICC 0.876) and substantial for D* (ICC 0.654) and f (ICC 0.606). Bland–Altman plots revealed no significant bias.

Conclusion: Administration of GBCM seems to have a stronger effect on D* and f values than on D values. This should be considered when applying IVIM in clinical practice.

著者関連情報
© 2024 by Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons [Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International] license.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
前の記事 次の記事
feedback
Top