Research Journal of Educational Methods
Online ISSN : 2189-907X
Print ISSN : 0385-9746
ISSN-L : 0385-9746
Comparative analysis of Japanese and German educators' perceptions of early childhood education using multi-vocal ethnography : Clarifying their practical knowledge through frequently used key words
Hiroshi ASHIDAKiyomi AKITAMasatoshi SUZUKIRiyo KADOTATakako NOGUCHIYutaka ODA
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2007 Volume 32 Pages 107-117

Details
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to clarify and to compare perceptions of early childhood education as representations of tacit practical knowledge of Japanese and German early childhood educators, using video-cued multi-vocal ethnography. For the method for analysis, the authors interpreted the data with identifying key words included most frequently in the discourse of early childhood educators, and categorizing the contents of sentences that include those key words. In doing so, one can speculate that which key words are commonly used between cultures of Japanese and German early childhood education, and what is argued by those terminologies. The central themes of each culture's own shared perception and practical knowledge regarding early childhood education are depicted through such analysis. As a result, three common themes are found: 'respect for children's autonomy and independence/opposition to teachers' instruction', 'standpoint of emphasizing children's social development', and 'concern for safety'. However, the internal structures of those perspectives are different from Japanese to German concepts, reflecting each country's history, culture, and system of early childhood education. Elucidating such differences gave meaningful suggestions for educational reform in both countries. Also, 'consideration for traditional gender role' emerged as a unique category from the German side. This point, though, does not resulted only from the difference in culture of early childhood education, but also from the cultures of each society as a whole.
Content from these authors
© 2007 National Association for the Study of Educational Methods
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top