日本印刷学会誌
Online ISSN : 1882-4935
Print ISSN : 0914-3319
ISSN-L : 0914-3319
論文
Comparison of Corporative Allocation Methods and Product Cumulative Methods for Printing Service Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
清水 宏和永田 勝也ハンスエブサイ アラン
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー

2012 年 49 巻 4 号 p. 263-271

詳細
抄録
Printing Service LCCO2e is schematized during the process of the set-in of Carbon Footprint of Products and then developed as Printing Service Integrated LCA to evaluate not only CO2e emission but also other impact categories such as natural recourses, energy drain, waste disposal and so forth. While some printers try to start calculating environmental load for printed matters, they can select either one of two quantification methods which are approved to be utilized; one is "allocation method" based on corporate activity based manner and the other is "cumulative method" based on product based manner. LCA study usually does not allow organizations to compete each other by numerical number of environmental load, but most of print-buyers or consumers might accept everything for what it is whenever they have a look. A case study of paper package production is attempted to be validated by the scale of CO2e emission for long⁄mid⁄short-run jobs to understand actual difference in practice. In conclusion, printers ideally can utilize allocation method for calculating organizational load to reduce corporate environmental load and cumulative method for calculating the load from actual product production. It is significant for all levels of printers to be able to utilize both allocation and cumulative methods for reducing existing environmental load and taking future outside pressure off from print-buyers to improve corporate and product performance.
著者関連情報
© 2012 The Japanese Society of Printing Science and Technology
前の記事 次の記事
feedback
Top