2021 Volume 8 Issue 1 Pages 485-491
Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare malignant tumor that typically arises in the lungs. It is especially rare in the sinonasal cavity, and treatment has not been established. In this study, we present the case of a 56-year-old woman with a large sinonasal LCNEC that extended into her brain. We performed endonasal endoscopic and transcranial combined surgery followed by chemoradiation therapy. The combined surgery enabled us to approach and remove the extensive tumor from two different directions at one time less invasively. We have achieved good tumor control for 18 months so far.
Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare malignant tumor, which was first proposed in 1991 by Travis et al. as a classification of pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors.1) Since then, LCNEC from other origins has been reported.2,3) Among them, LCNEC in the sinonasal cavity is especially rare, and no consensus has been reached regarding its treatment. In this study, we present a case of a large sinonasal LCNEC with intracranial extension. We performed radical surgical resection followed by chemoradiation therapy and have succeeded in controlling the tumor for 18 months so far. As far as we know, this is the first report to resect a large sinonasal LCNEC that extended into the brain with a combination of endonasal endoscopic and transcranial approaches, and to achieve good tumor control. In this report, we discuss the treatment of sinonasal LCNEC based on previous reports.
Case ReportThe patient is a 56-year-old woman who consulted our institute because of progressive exophthalmos, chemosis in her left eye, double vision, severe headache, and nausea. She also suffered from anosmia and tasting disturbance 1 month before consultation. Brain CT demonstrated a large mass in her left nasal cavity that had expanded into the left frontal lobe, and hence, she was admitted to our institute. Enhanced MRI showed a cystic tumor in her frontal lobe with perifocal edema, with a maximum diameter of 55 mm. MRI also showed a solid mass in her nasal cavity compressing her left eye (Fig. 1A–C). Tumor biopsy was performed from the nose under local anesthesia, and the pathological diagnosis was a small round cell tumor with neuroendocrine differentiation. Because of the rapid progression of her symptoms including increased intracranial pressure and the pathological malignancy of the tumor, we tried to resect the tumor in one session with a combination of endonasal endoscopic and transcranial approaches. Prior to surgery, angiography (Fig. 1D) and vascular embolization were performed to control hemorrhage. Two days before the surgery, under general anesthesia, left ethmoidal arteries were embolized with N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate, and left sphenopalatine artery, infraorbital artery, and lateral nasal artery were embolized with Embosphere microspheres and free/detachable coils.
The patient was placed in the supine position. Under general anesthesia, an endoscope was introduced through her left nasal cavity. The tumor had invaded the nasal mucosa of the left middle turbinate and expanded into sphenoid sinus and maxillary sinus through each ostium. The nasal septum and the right nasal cavity were intact. The tumor in the left nasal cavity was removed in a piecemeal fashion using an ultrasonic aspirator (SONOPET; Stryker, Tokyo, Japan). The tumor was solid and hemorrhagic. The transcranial surgeon performed a left frontal craniotomy, and the large intracranial cystic tumor, whose base adhered to the left frontal lobe, was removed en bloc to avoid dissemination.
The tumor had expanded into the intradural space from the left cribriform plate, and therefore, the frontal base bone was drilled out from the frontal sinus to the sphenoid sinus. The tumor, which tightly adhered to the left periorbital area and extended into the left maxillary/frontal/sphenoid/ethmoid sinuses with mucosal invasion, was dissected by a combination of endonasal endoscopic and transcranial approaches. To avoid intracranial dissemination, both surgeons did not use ultrasonic aspirator after connecting both surgical route, and most of the solid tumor was removed by transnasal approach. After macroscopic total resection of tumor, rapid histological evaluation showed positive margin in some of the surrounding mucosal tissues, and so additional resection was achieved to these lesions.
The frontal base dura was replaced with fascia lata and sealed with fibrin glue, and a nasoseptal mucosal flap that was harvested from the right side was lined up to cover the bone defect. Spinal drainage of cerebrospinal fluid continued for 1 week postoperatively.
Postoperative courseThe patient did not show any newly developed neurological deficits, and her headache and nausea disappeared soon after surgery. Postoperative MRI showed gross total resection of the tumor (Fig. 2). The final pathological diagnosis was LCNEC (Fig. 3), and she received adjuvant chemoradiation therapy with reference to small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC): four cycles of cisplatin (80 mg/m2/day 1) and etoposide (100 mg/m2/days 1–3) together with 40 Gy/20 fractions local radiation therapy to cover the tumor margin and boost stereotactic radiotherapy (Cyberknife: margin dose 25 Gy/5 fractions) to the tumor origin (anterior skull base). During the follow-up period of 18 months, the patient has not shown any local recurrence or metastasis as confirmed with positron emission CT, and her performance status has remained good (Karnofsky performance scale: 90).
LCNEC was introduced as a new distinct category of lung cancer by Travis et al. in 1991.1) LCNEC is histologically characterized by large cells with abundant cytoplasm, necrotic areas, a high mitotic rate, and neuroendocrine features. Since then, LCNEC has been reported in other origins including the gastrointestinal tract2) and genital organs.3) Sinonasal LCNEC is especially rare. In 2012, Kao et al. showed that patients with head and neck LCNEC are older, more commonly have advanced stage disease with a poorer prognosis, and more commonly have tumors that overexpress p53. These authors insisted that LCNECs should be separated from other carcinoids.4) According to this proposal, in the 2017 World Health Organization classification of head and neck tumors, LCNEC was defined as a poorly differentiated NEC. Thus, sinonasal LCNEC is a relatively new concept, and its treatment strategy has not been developed. Even lung LCNEC does not have any evidence-based treatments. Surgery followed by chemoradiation therapy is often conducted for lung LCNEC based on the regimen for SCLC.5) Hence, here we performed surgery and adjuvant chemoradiation therapy with the SCLC regimen.
To plan the surgery, we referred to treatment for malignant tumors in the anterior skull base. Esthesioneuroblastoma, for example, is treated with radical resection of the tumor and postoperative radiotherapy.6) In such cases, the craniofacial approach, which was first described in 1963, is chosen to expose the tumor.7) The approach enables removal of the tumor en bloc with a safe tumor margin, whereas internal decompression is not recommended to prevent dissemination of malignant cells. A previous study showed that negative margins were achieved in a higher percentage of cases with en bloc resection than with piecemeal resections, and recurrence-free survival was superior with en bloc resection.8) Therefore, one-piece removal with the craniofacial approach has been considered the gold standard for anterior skull base malignant tumors.9)
However, the craniofacial approach requires a large facial skin incision, which may lead to morbidities such as osteomyelitis, wound infection, facial anesthesia, and diplopia, and postoperative cosmetic results are not satisfactory and involve a longer recovery time.10) The endoscopic endonasal approach, which can help overcome these problems, was initially limited to benign disease in the nasal cavity and has been developed and started to be adopted for malignant tumors that extend into the anterior skull base with piecemeal resection as first reported by Yuen et al. in 1997.11) This method has been criticized because it ignores the common principal that malignant tumors should be resected en bloc.8,9) However, some recent reports showed that less invasive methods with endoscopic endonasal tumor removal result in the same tumor control rate as conventional craniofacial resection with better cosmetic results.10,12) To select the appropriate approach in each case, Naunheim et al. proposed an algorithm of approaches for malignant tumors in the anterior skull base. He suggested the following four approaches depending on the tumor location and extent: endoscopic, endoscopic and craniotomy, transfacial, and transfacial and craniotomy.13)
Based on these previous studies, we adopted the endoscopic endonasal approach instead of the craniofacial approach, combined with the transcranial approach. In our institute, the combined endoscopic endonasal and transcranial approaches have often been adopted to resect adenomas, and we have expertise in the combined approach.14) Here we succeeded in radical resection of the large LCNEC without cutting the patient’s face. After postoperative chemoradiation therapy, no local recurrence or metastasis have been detected in the 18-month follow-up. Our case supports the efficacy of piecemeal resection of a malignant tumor with a less invasive approach.
Including our case, 12 sinonasal LCNECs have been reported (Table 1).4,15–20) Eight cases were resected surgically. The endoscopic approach was used in two cases (Lahma et al.18) and our case), and the combined endoscopic and transcranial approaches were used only in our case according to our review of published papers. In four cases, the tumor extended into the intracranial fossa. Our case is the only report of resection of a tumor with intracranial extension and achievement of good tumor control.
| Author, year | Age/sex | Symptoms | Location, size (mm) | Treatments | Follow-up period (months), postoperative course |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mendis and Malik, 200815) | 73/male | Right nasal obstruction, discharge, epistaxis | Right nasal cavity, frontal sinus, bilateral ethmoid/maxillary sinuses | S+R | 20, NED |
| Kao et al., 20124) | 39/male | ND | Sinonasal tract-nasal cavity | S+R | 45, NED |
| 42/male | ND | Sinonasal tract-ethmoid sinus | S+C+R | 26, DWD | |
| 80/male | ND | Sinonasal tract-nasal cavity | S+C+R | 53, DWD | |
| Gudlavalleti et al., 201616) | 81/male | Headache, right eye ptosis, restricted extraocular movements | Right nasal cavity, orbit, maxilla, cribriform plate, intracranial fossa | C+R | ND |
| Thompson et al., 201617) | 58/male | ND | Sinonasal cavity, intracranial fossa | S+C+R | 12, DWD |
| 66/male | ND | Sinonasal cavity, neck metastasis | C+R | 18, DWD | |
| 70/female | ND | Sinonasal cavity, intracranial fossa | S+C+R | 9, AWD | |
| Lahma et al., 201818) | 70/male | Nasal obstruction, epistaxis | Nasal cavity, 40 × 28 × 35 | S+C+R | 6, NED |
| Campos et al., 201819) | 68/female | Right ocular pruritus, edema, wasting, proptosis, ocular pain, and secretion | Right orbit, maxillary/ethmoid/sphenoid sinuses | C+R | 36, NED |
| Zhao et al., 201920) | 40/male | Nasal obstruction, olfactory anesthesia | Left nasal cavity, bilateral maxillary/ethmoid/frontal/sphenoid sinuses, 70 × 52 | C+R | 10, NED |
| Our case | 56/female | Exophthalmos, left chemosis, double vision, headache, nausea, anosmia, tasting disturbance | Left nasal cavity, maxillary/ethmoid/sphenoid/frontal sinuses, frontal lobe, 83 × 51 × 34 | S+C+R | 18, NED |
AWD: alive with disease, C: chemotherapy, DWD: dead with disease, LCNEC: large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, ND: not described, NED: no evidence of disease (alive), R: radiation therapy, S: surgery.
Interestingly, the LCNECs in Campos’s and Zhao’s reports achieved complete remission with chemoradiation therapy without surgical resection, although the tumor sizes were relatively large.19,20) However, the LCNECs in both cases did not extend into the intracranial fossa. Sensitivity to chemoradiation therapy may be different according to tumor size, extension, complications, and molecular findings. Therefore, we do not know whether chemoradiation therapy without surgery is sufficient to achieve complete remission for sinonasal LCNEC with intracranial extension like our case. We also note that complete remission during the relatively short follow-up periods in Campos’s and Zhao’s papers does not always mean a good longer-term prognosis. To investigate better treatments for LCNECs, we need more cases with longer follow-up. We also need to consider other strategies. For example, recent studies showed that lung LCNEC has a quite specific pattern of programmed cell-death-protein-1-ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression, which is associated with prognosis.21,22) Thus, immunotherapy may be a new strategy to manage LCNEC in the near future, although only a case report23) and a small cohort study24) have been reported in lung. We need more studies from various standpoints to address sinonasal LCNEC.
A large sinonasal LCNEC that extended into the intracranial fossa was successfully controlled by radical surgical resection with an endoscopic endonasal and transcranial combined approach followed by chemoradiation therapy.
The patient provided written informed consent.
We thank Dr. Shinji Ito at the Department of Pathology, Toranomon Hospital for pathological analysis. We also thank Dr. Wataro Tsuruta at the Department of Neuro-Endovascular Therapy, Toranomon Hospital for vascular embolization.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
