Progress of Digestive Endoscopy
Online ISSN : 2187-4999
Print ISSN : 1348-9844
ISSN-L : 1348-9844
Risk factors for rebleeding following endoscopic hemostasis in peptic ulcers
Tomoyuki KitagawaKoichiro SatoYuuki YoshidaSayo ItoTakeshi SuzukiKenji TominagaMitsuru KatoYukio TakenakaKaho HirayamaMakiko MoriIruru Maetani
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2013 Volume 82 Issue 1 Pages 60-63

Details
Abstract
Background and Aim : Although development of endoscopic procedures enables hemostasis to be achieved endoscopically, some cases still prove difficult for this procedure. Re-bleeding or even fatal cases have occurred. We retrospectively analyzed endoscopic hemostasis for hemorrhagic peptic ulcer bleeding in our department.
Subjects and Method : A total of 141 patients underwent endoscopic hemostasis for hemorrhagic gastroduodenal ulcer in our department between January 2008 and November 2012. These patients were divided into two groups : successful and re-bleeding. Multivariate analysis was used to examine various factors─patient background, endoscopy-related and surgeon-related─as risk factors for rebleeding.
Results : In the 141 cases, the average age was 67.2±16 and the male-to-female sex ratio was 104 : 37. In the successful group, average age was 66.5±16 and male-to-female ratio was 88 : 34. In the re-bleeding group, average age was 71.7±16, and male-to-female ratio was 16 : 3. In the re-bleeding group, there were significantly more patients with comorbidity, and patients who received transfusions. Multivariate analysis results suggest that comorbidity is a risk factor for rebleeding.
Conclusion : Patients with comorbidity may be at increased risk of re-bleeding. Strict observation of patients is necessary after endoscopic hemostasis procedures.
Content from these authors
© 2013 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society Kanto Chapter
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top