Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai Kaishi (Journal of the Japanese Society of Periodontology)
Online ISSN : 1880-408X
Print ISSN : 0385-0110
ISSN-L : 0385-0110
A Clinical Evaluation of an S 30 Dentifrice on Periodontal Disease using the Double Blind Method
Tadashi NAKASHIZUKAKatsumi MIZUNOHitoshi ITOIsao TAKADAMasaru KAWAIYoh WATANABEYuzo OHNOToru NISHIMURASumio OHTAYushin TAKAHASHIHiroshi OKADATakao MIKIHiroshi YAMAGAMIKeiji KINOSHITAKenji ADACHIYoshio NOMURAKazumasa SOGAKazuyuki KUBOTAKeiko FUNABIKIShiro KINOSHITAIsao ISHIKAWAToshihide NOGUCHIMitsunori OSHUGIKatsunori IZUMISAWATomomi NAKAJIMARyohei MATSUOShigeru ODATetsuichiro SATOYasumi ISOMakoto OHNOYasuaki OTAHiroyuki KUROKAWASetsuko SIRATORIIchiro SIOZUToshikatsu NAKAZAKIKatsumi IKEDAToru HIKIMAKimihito KUSUNOKIYukio WATANABEHiroshi FUJIHASHIKiichiro HIYOSHITakahiro SHIMOJIMA
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

1982 Volume 24 Issue 4 Pages 633-654

Details
Abstract
The clinical effect of an S 30 dentifrice, containing a hypertonic salt, on simple gingivitis and marginal periodontitis was examined, using the double blind method, with an inactive placebo as the control. The S 30 dentifrice contains 30% sodium chloride, 0.05% isopropyl methylphenol, 0.01% thymol and 0.1% clove oil in a toothpaste base. Using the Scrubbing or Bass method, tooth brushing was performed by all the patients three times a day for 4 weeks.
The clinical effect of the S 30 dentifrice was assessed using the Mann-Whitney U-test based on the reduction ratio of the total scores of the indices to 4 clinical assessments (gingival redness, swelling, bleeding and pus-discharge) and the total number of the clinical conditions to 9 clinical assessments (plaque, calculus, redness, swelling, pocket depth, bleeding, pus-discharge, mobility and halitosis) respectively in an initial examination before using the S30 dentifrice was initiated and at the end of every weeks thereafter for the entire 4 weeks of the evaluation.
The results were as follows:
1. Simple gingivitis showed a statistically significant difference (P<0.01 and/or P<0.05), in the reduction ratio between the S 30 dentifrice and the placebo on the total scores and number of both the 4 clinical assessments after 2 and 3 weeks and the 9 clinical assessments after 1, 2 and 3 weeks, respectively.
2. Marginal periodontitis showed no significant difference in the reduction ratio between the S 30 dentifrice and the placebo on the total scores of the 4 clinical assessments: however, after 3 weeks, showed a significant difference (P<0.05), on the total number of the 9 clinical assessments.
3. Periodontal disease (gingivitis and periodontitis) showed a significant difference (P<0.01 and/or P<0.05), in the reduction ratio between the S 30 dentifrice and placebo on the total scores of the 4 clinical assessments after 3 weeks, and on the total number of the 4 clinical assessments after 1, 2 and 3 weeks, and on the total scores of the 9 clinical assessments after 2 and 3 weeks and on the total number of the 9 clinical assessments after 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks, respectively.
4. The side effects were slight in 3 patients using the S 30 dentifrice and in 1 patient using the placebo.
Content from these authors
© The Japanese Society of Periodontology
Previous article
feedback
Top