2025 Volume 101 Issue 10 Pages 657-658
In this paper, Fig. 7 and Table 2 show that CRrev1 has high performance as well as IA and the following should be corrected as follows:

Relationships between (a) Eobs and Einv, (b) Eobs and ECR_conv, (c) Eobs and ECR_rev1, and (d) Eobs and ECR_rev2 based on yearly analyses.
| Order | First | Second | Third | Fourth | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IA | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 9 |
| CRconv | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| CRrev1 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| CRrev2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
Note: Total number of cases is three land uses × three time unit.
First: Regression coefficient is 0.9–1.1.
Second: Regression coefficient is 0.8–0.9 or 1.1–1.2.
Third: Regression coefficient is 0.7–0.8 or 1.2–1.3.
Fourth: Regression coefficient is <0.7 or >1.3.
In Table 3, the total average of monthly value should be corrected as follows:
| IA Eobs-Einv |
CRconv Eobs-ECR_conv |
CRrev1 Eobs-ECR_rev1 |
CRrev2 Eobs-ECR_rev 2 |
Eobs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total average | 17.2 | 26.7 | 20.7 | 35.4 | 49.6 |
In Tables 7–9 in Appendix C–E, the following should be corrected as follows:
| Table | Land use | Item | IA | CRconv | CRrev1 | CRrev2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eobs vs. Einv | Eobs vs. ECR_rev | Eobs vs. ECR_conv | Eobs vs. ECR_rev | |||||||
| Slope | R2 | Slope | R2 | Slope | R2 | Slope | R2 | |||
| 7 | Forest | Average | 0.834 | 0.621 | 1.094 | 0.817 | 1.040 | 0.828 | 0.681 | 0.593 |
| Farmland | Average | 0.821 | 0.665 | 0.926 | 0.916 | 0.924 | 0.913 | 0.376 | 0.696 | |
| Dryland | Average | 0.422 | 0.327 | 1.293 | 0.688 | 1.177 | 0.785 | 0.721 | 0.494 | |
| Total average | 0.692 | 0.537 | 1.104 | 0.807 | 1.047 | 0.842 | 0.592 | 0.594 | ||
| 8 | Forest | Average | 0.986 | 0.933 | 1.146 | 0.920 | 0.964 | 0.941 | 0.726 | 0.872 |
| Farmland | Average | 0.960 | 0.966 | 0.970 | 0.945 | 0.972 | 0.974 | 0.443 | 0.768 | |
| Dryland | Average | 0.672 | 0.709 | 1.357 | 0.737 | 1.266 | 0.857 | 0.857 | 0.725 | |
| Total average | 0.873 | 0.869 | 1.158 | 0.867 | 1.067 | 0.924 | 0.675 | 0.788 | ||
| 9 | Forest | Average | 1.043 | 0.992 | 1.077 | 0.981 | 1.089 | 0.973 | 0.754 | 0.968 |
| Farmland | Average | 0.961 | 0.994 | 0.880 | 0.989 | 0.968 | 0.995 | 0.496 | 0.979 | |
| Dryland | Average | 0.945 | 0.962 | 1.444 | 0.967 | 1.436 | 0.986 | 1.070 | 0.918 | |
| Total average | 0.983 | 0.983 | 1.134 | 0.979 | 1.164 | 0.985 | 0.773 | 0.955 | ||