Published: 1956 Received: -Available on J-STAGE: February 24, 2009Accepted: -
Advance online publication: -
Revised: -
Correction information
Date of correction: February 24, 2009Reason for correction: -Correction: CITATIONDetails: Wrong : 1) Gibson, J. J.: Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of curved lines. J. Exp. Psychol., 1933, 16, 1-31. 2) Gibson, J. J. and Radner, M.: Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines I. J. Exp. Psychol., 1937, 20, 453-467. 3) Gibson, J. J.: Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines II. J. Exp. Psychol.,1937, 20, 553-569. 4) Köhler, W.: Dynamics in Psychology, N. Y.: Liveright co., 1940. 5) Köhler, W. and Wallach, H.: Figural after-effect; an investigation of visual process. Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc., 1944, 88, 269-357. 6) Motokawa, K.: Physiological basis of sensation, Kagaku., 1948, 18, 526-537. 7) Nozawa, S.: On the figural after-effect by intermittent presentation of inspection figure., Jap. Psychol. Research., 1955, 2, 9-16. 8) Kaneko, T. and Obonai, T.: Factors of intensity, quantity and distance in psychophysiological induction. Jap. J. Psychol., 1952, 23, 73-79. 9) Ohkawa, N. : The effect of Various figures upon C. F. F. of a flickering small patch. Jap. Psychol. Research., 1954, 1,34-44. 10) Yokose, Z. and Uchiyama, M.: The measurement of the field forces in visual perception. lap. J. Psychol., 1952, 22, 41-56. 11) Yokose, Z.: “The law of the field” in visual form perception (I)-A theoretical formula to seek the field strength of the form and its experimental proof-. Jap. Psychol. Research., 1954, 1, 55-64
Right : 1) Gibson, J. J.: Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of curved lines. J. Exp. Psychol., 1933, 16, 1-31. 2) Gibson, J. J. and Radner, M.: Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines I. J. Exp. Psychol., 1937, 20, 453-467. 3) Gibson, J. J.: Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines II. J. Exp. Psychol., 1937, 20, 553-569. 4) Köhler, W.: Dynamics in Psychology, N. Y.: Liveright co., 1940. 5) Köhler, W. and Wallach, H.: Figural after-effect; an investigation of visual process. Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc., 1944, 88, 269-357. 6) Motokawa, K.: Physiological basis of sensation, Kagaku., 1948, 18, 526-537. 7) Nozawa, S.: On the figural after-effect by intermittent presentation of inspection figure., Jap. Psychol. Research., 1955, 2, 9-16. 8) Kaneko, T. and Obonai, T.: Factors of intensity, quantity and distance in psychophysiological induction. Jap. J. Psychol., 1952, 23, 73-79. 9) Ohkawa, N.: The effect of Various figures upon C. F. F. of a flickering small patch. Jap. Psychol. Research., 1954, 1, 34-44. 10) Yokose, Z. and Uchiyama, M.: The measurement of the field forces in visual perception. Jap. J. Psychol., 1952, 22, 41-56. 11) Yokose, Z.: “The law of the field” in visual form perception (I)-A theoretical formula to seek the field strength of the form and its experimental proof-. Jap. Psychol. Research., 1954, 1, 55-64
Date of correction: February 24, 2009Reason for correction: -Correction: PDF FILEDetails: -
Date of correction: February 24, 2009Reason for correction: -Correction: CITATIONDetails: Wrong : 1) Gibson, J. J.: Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of curved lines. J. Exp. Psychol., 1933, 16, 1-31. 2) Gibson, J. J. and Radner, M.: Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines I. J. Exp. Psychol., 1937, 20, 453-467. 3) Gibson, J. J.: Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines II. J. Exp. Psychol., 1937, 20, 553-569. 4) Köhler, W.: Dynamics in Psychology, N. Y.: Liveright co., 1940. 5) Köhler, W. and Wallach, H.: Figural after-effect; an investigation of visual process. Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc., 1944, 88, 269-357. 6) Motokawa, K.: Physiological basis of sensation, Kagaku., 1948, 18, 526-537. 7) Nozawa, S.: On the figural after-effect by intermittent presentation of inspection figure., Jap. Psychol. Research., 1955, 2, 9-16. 8) Kaneko, T. and Obonai, T.: Factors of intensity, quantity and distance in psychophysiological induction. Jap. J. Psychol., 1952, 23, 73-79. 9) Ohkawa, N.: The effect of Various figures upon C. F. F. of a flickering small patch. Jap. Psychol. Research., 1954, 1, 34-44. 10) Yokose, Z. and Uchiyama, M.: The measurement of the field forces in visual perception. Jap. J. Psychol., 1952, 22, 41-56. 11) Yokose, Z.: “The law of the field” in visual form perception (I)-A theoretical formula to seek the field strength of the form and its experimental proof-. Jap. Psychol. Research., 1954, 1, 55-64
Right : 1) Gibson, J. J.: Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of curved lines. J. Exp. Psychol., 1933, 16, 1-31. 2) Gibson, J. J. and Radner, M.: Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines I. J. Exp. Psychol., 1937, 20, 453-467. 3) Gibson, J. J.: Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines II. J. Exp. Psychol., 1937, 20, 553-569. 4) Köhler, W.: Dynamics in Psychology, N. Y.: Liveright co., 1940. 5) Köhler, W. and Wallach, H.: Figural after-effect; an investigation of visual process. Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc., 1944, 88, 269-357. 6) Motokawa, K.: Physiological basis of sensation, Kagaku., 1948, 18, 526-537. 7) Nozawa, S.: On the figural after-effect by intermittent presentation of inspection figure., Jap. Psychol. Research., 1955, 2, 9-16. 8) Kaneko, T. and Obonai, T.: Factors of intensity, quantity and distance in psychophysiological induction. Jap. J. Psychol., 1952, 23, 73-79. 9) Ohkawa, N.: The effect of Various figures upon C. F. F. of a flickering small patch. Jap. Psychol. Research., 1954, 1, 34-44. 10) Yokose, Z. and Uchiyama, M.: The measurement of the field forces in visual perception. Jap. J. Psychol., 1952, 22, 41-56. 11) Yokose, Z.:“The law of the field” in visual form perception (I)-A theoretical formula to seek the field strength of the form and its experimental proof-. Jap. Psychol. Research., 1954, 1, 55-64