FACTORS AFFECTING THE RESOLUTION OF CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION (CNV)

SHOJI KAKIGI; TAKASHI MATSUDA; GENICHI HAGINO

doi:10.4992/psycholres1954.20.187

SHOJI KAKIGI, TAKASHI MATSUDA, GENICHI HAGINO

Author information

JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

1978 Volume 20 Issue 4 Pages 187-190

DOI https://doi.org/10.4992/psycholres1954.20.187

Details

Published: March 30, 1979 Received: April 28, 1978 Available on J-STAGE: February 24, 2009 Accepted: - Advance online publication: - Revised: -
Correction information
Date of correction: February 24, 2009 Reason for correction: - Correction: ABSTRACT Details: Wrong : The present experiment was designed to investigate the factors affecting the resolution of the contingent negative variation (CNV). In the first session, 11 subjects were tested in a standard CNV paradigm. These subjects were then tested in a probability learning paradigm in which a red or green feedback light informed the subjects whether their choice of response was correct or incorrect. The feedback stimuli were presented .75, 1, and 1.5 sec after the imperative stimulus. The results showed that the resolution of CNV occurred immediately after the motor response in the standard CNV paradigm. In the feedback paradigm, on the other hand, the resolution of CNV occurred only after the feedback stimulus. The results suggested that the resolution of CNV is contingent upon the psychological state of completion initiated by the feedback stimulus rather than the motor response.
Right : The present experiment was designed to investigate the factors affecting the resolution of the contingent negative variation (CNV). In the first session, 11 subjects were tested in a standard CNV paradigm. These subjects were then tested in a probability learning paradigm in which a red or green feedback light informed the subjects whether their choice of response was correct or incorrect. The feedback stimuli were presented. 75, 1, and 1.5 sec after the imperative stimulus. The results showed that the resolution of CNV occurred immediately after the motor response in the standard CNV paradigm. In the feedback paradigm, on the other hand, the resolution of CNV occurred only after the feedback stimulus. The results suggested that the resolution of CNV is contingent upon the psychological state of completion initiated by the feedback stimulus rather than the motor response.

Date of correction: February 24, 2009 Reason for correction: - Correction: CITATION Details: Wrong : BOSTEM, F., ROUSEAU, J. C., DEGOSSELY, M., & DONGIER, M. 1967 Psychopathological correlations of the non-specific portion of visual and auditory evoked potentials and the as- sociated contingent negative variation. Electroencephalograply and Clinical Neurophysiology, 26, Supplment, 131-138.
DONCHIN, E., GERBRANDT, L. K., LEIFER, L., & TUCKER, L. 1972 Is the contingent negative variation contingent on a motor response? Psychophysiology, 9, 178-188.
PICTON, T. W., & Low, M. D. 1971 The CNV and semantic content of stimuli in the experimental paradigm: Effects of feedback. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neuroplysiology, 31,451-456.
TECCE, J. 1972 Contingent negative variation (CNV) and psychological processes in man. Psychological Bulletin, 77, 73-108.
WALTER, W. G., COOPER, R., ALDRIDGE, V. J., MCCALLUM, W. C., & WINTER, A. L. 1964 Contingent negative variation: An electrical sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature (London), 203, 380-384.
WEINBERG, H. 1973 The contingent negative variation: Its relation to feedback and expectant attention. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 33, Supplment, 219-228.

Right : BOSTEM, F., ROUSEAU, J. C., DEGOSSELY, M., & DONGIER, M. 1967 Psychopathological correlations of the non-specific portion of visual and auditory evoked potentials and the associated contingent negative variation. Electroencephalograply and Clinical Neurophysiology, 26, Supplment, 131-138.
DONCHIN, E., GERBRANDT, L. K., LEIFER, L., & TUCKER, L. 1972 Is the contingent negative variation contingent on a motor response? Psychophysiology, 9, 178-188.
PICTON, T. W., & Low, M. D. 1971 The CNV and semantic content of stimuli in the experimental paradigm: Effects of feedback. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 31, 451-456.
TECCE, J. 1972 Contingent negative variation (CNV) and psychological processes in man. Psychological Bulletin, 77, 73-108.
WALTER, W. G., COOPER, R., ALDRIDGE, V. J., MCCALLUM, W. C., & WINTER, A. L. 1964 Contingent negative variation: An electrical sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature (London), 203, 380-384.
WEINBERG, H. 1973 The contingent negative variation: Its relation to feedback and expectant attention. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 33, Supplment, 219-228.

Date of correction: February 24, 2009 Reason for correction: - Correction: PDF FILE Details: -

Date of correction: February 24, 2009 Reason for correction: - Correction: ABSTRACT Details: Wrong : The present experiment was designed to investigate the factors affecting the resolution of the contingent negative variation (CNV). In the first session, 11 subjects were tested in a standard CNV paradigm. These subjects were then tested in a probability learning paradigm in which a red or green feedback light informed the subjects whether their choice of response was correct or incorrect. The feedback stimuli were presented. 75, 1, and 1.5 sec after the imperative stimulus. The results showed that the resolution of CNV occurred immediately after the motor response in the standard CNV paradigm. In the feedback paradigm, on the other hand, the resolution of CNV occurred only after the feedback stimulus. The results suggested that the resolution of CNV is contingent upon the psychological state of completion initiated by the feedback stimulus rather than the motor response.
Right : The present experiment was designed to investigate the factors affecting the resolution of the contingent negative variation (CNV). In the first session, 11 subjects were tested in a standard CNV paradigm. These subjects were then tested in a probability learning paradigm in which a red or green feedback light informed the subjects whether their choice of response was correct or incorrect. The feedback stimuli were presented.75, 1, and 1.5 sec after the imperative stimulus. The results showed that the resolution of CNV occurred immediately after the motor response in the standard CNV paradigm. In the feedback paradigm, on the other hand, the resolution of CNV occurred only after the feedback stimulus. The results suggested that the resolution of CNV is contingent upon the psychological state of completion initiated by the feedback stimulus rather than the motor response.

Date of correction: February 24, 2009 Reason for correction: - Correction: CITATION Details: Wrong : BOSTEM, F., ROUSEAU, J. C., DEGOSSELY, M., & DONGIER, M. 1967 Psychopathological correlations of the non-specific portion of visual and auditory evoked potentials and the associated contingent negative variation. Electroencephalograply and Clinical Neurophysiology, 26, Supplment, 131-138.
DONCHIN, E., GERBRANDT, L. K., LEIFER, L., & TUCKER, L. 1972 Is the contingent negative variation contingent on a motor response? Psychophysiology, 9, 178-188.
PICTON, T. W., & Low, M. D. 1971 The CNV and semantic content of stimuli in the experimental paradigm: Effects of feedback. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 31, 451-456.
TECCE, J. 1972 Contingent negative variation (CNV) and psychological processes in man. Psychological Bulletin, 77, 73-108.
WALTER, W. G., COOPER, R., ALDRIDGE, V. J., MCCALLUM, W. C., & WINTER, A. L. 1964 Contingent negative variation: An electrical sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature (London), 203, 380-384.
WEINBERG, H. 1973 The contingent negative variation: Its relation to feedback and expectant attention. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 33, Supplment, 219-228.

Right : BOSTEM, F., ROUSEAU, J. C., DEGOSSELY, M., & DONGIER, M. 1967 Psychopathological correlations of the non-specific portion of visual and auditory evoked potentials and the associated contingent negative variation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 26, Supplment, 131-138.
DONCHIN, E., GERBRANDT, L. K., LEIFER, L., & TUCKER, L. 1972 Is the contingent negative variation contingent on a motor response? Psychophysiology, 9, 178-188.
PICTON, T. W., & Low, M. D. 1971 The CNV and semantic content of stimuli in the experimental paradigm: Effects of feedback. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 31, 451-456.
TECCE, J. 1972 Contingent negative variation (CNV) and psychological processes in man. Psychological Bulletin, 77, 73-108.
WALTER, W. G., COOPER, R., ALDRIDGE, V. J., McCALLUM, W. C., & WINTER, A. L. 1964 Contingent negative variation: An electrical sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature (London), 203, 380-384.
WEINBERG, H. 1973 The contingent negative variation: Its relation to feedback and expectant attention. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 33, Supplment, 219-228.

Abstract

The present experiment was designed to investigate the factors affecting the resolution of the contingent negative variation (CNV). In the first session, 11 subjects were tested in a standard CNV paradigm. These subjects were then tested in a probability learning paradigm in which a red or green feedback light informed the subjects whether their choice of response was correct or incorrect. The feedback stimuli were presented.75, 1, and 1.5 sec after the imperative stimulus. The results showed that the resolution of CNV occurred immediately after the motor response in the standard CNV paradigm. In the feedback paradigm, on the other hand, the resolution of CNV occurred only after the feedback stimulus. The results suggested that the resolution of CNV is contingent upon the psychological state of completion initiated by the feedback stimulus rather than the motor response.

Corresponding author

Correction information

Register with J-STAGE for free!