Abstract
MACS (Mastery and Assessment of Clinical Skills) was conducted to evaluate the clinical practices of third year students of physical therapy. Results from MACS, questionnaires to supervisors (SVs) and present conventional evaluation forms were examined and clarification was made of the following.
① Assessment by finer criteria of MACS is better. ② The usefulness of MACS in teaching PT practice is more in the second half of clinical practice. ③ Communication between SVs is very important. ④ A challenging approval system (double examination) is quite important.
