2025 年 11 巻 1 号 論文ID: cr.25-0182
INTRODUCTION: Aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) is the most common congenital anomaly of the subclavian artery, occurring in 0.2%–1.5% of the population. While typically asymptomatic, ARSA can cause dysphagia in older patients due to esophageal compression. In pediatric cases, it is less frequent and usually presents with chronic respiratory symptoms resulting from tracheal compression. Acute respiratory failure as a presentation of ARSA is extremely rare. This case report describes a pediatric patient with ARSA-associated esophageal stricture, leading to severe respiratory distress following food intake and requiring surgical treatment.
CASE PRESENTATION: A 1.8-year-old girl developed an inspiratory stridor after eating. Initial inhalation therapy provided temporary relief, but persistent respiratory distress prompted further evaluation. CT revealed an esophageal foreign body, which was successfully extracted using a balloon catheter. However, continued respiratory distress necessitated intubation and intensive care. Bronchoscopy and enhanced CT confirmed tracheal compression due to ARSA, along with esophageal stenosis. Despite initial medical management, recurrent respiratory distress and feeding difficulties required surgical intervention. A right thoracotomy was performed to reposition the aberrant artery anterior to the trachea, alleviating the vascular compression. Postoperatively, the patient made a full recovery, resumed a normal diet, and remained symptom-free at the 6-month follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic ARSA is rare in pediatric patients but can cause severe respiratory distress due to esophageal and tracheal compression. In cases of recurrent or severe symptoms, surgical intervention is essential to prevent life-threatening complications. This case highlights the importance of considering ARSA in pediatric patients with unexplained respiratory distress, especially when associated with feeding difficulties.
aberrant right subclavian artery
SDstandard deviation
Variations in the anatomy of the aortic arch are common in the general population and are often detected incidentally. A left-sided aortic arch with an ARSA is the most frequently occurring congenital anomaly of the subclavian artery, affecting 0.2%–1.5% of the population.1)
Most ARSA cases remain asymptomatic and are identified incidentally. When symptoms do occur, they typically involve dysphagia resulting from esophageal compression by an abnormally positioned blood vessel. Dysphagia is more commonly observed in older patients, as arteriosclerosis can exacerbate the compression-related symptoms.2) By contrast, ARSA is seldom diagnosed in pediatric patients. However, when symptoms manifest, they have been documented to primarily manifest as chronic airway symptoms. The etiology of respiratory symptoms in children is believed to be attributed to both the abnormal vascular course and the relative lack of tracheal rigidity during early childhood.3)
This report presents a pediatric case of acute respiratory failure triggered by an esophageal foreign body. The foreign body resulted from esophageal stricture caused by posterior compression of the esophagus by ARSA, ultimate necessitating surgical intervention.
A 1.8-year-old girl with no known medical history was transferred to our hospital due to inspiratory stridor following food intake. At admission, her body weight and height were 9.5 kg (+0.2 SD) and 81 cm (+1.7 SD), respectively. This finding indicated an absence of growth retardation, thereby suggesting that the patient did not have a chronic eating disorder.
The stridor first appeared after she consumed a meal, one before her transfer. She initially visited the emergency department at a local hospital, where inhalation therapy provided temporary symptom relief. However, as the stridor persisted, she sought further evaluation at a pediatric outpatient clinic the next day. A CT scan revealed an esophageal foreign body, prompting her transfer to our hospital for additional evaluation and treatment.
Upon arrival, the patient exhibited significant respiratory distress, characterized by accessory muscle use, retractions, and pronounced inspiratory stridor. Given the previous hospital’s CT findings indicating an esophageal foreign body, an emergency fluoroscopic examination was conducted (Fig. 1). The foreign body, a piece of eggplant, was successfully extracted using a balloon catheter. Additionally, the esophagus showed evidence of external compression from the dorsal side.
Despite the immediate relief of the esophageal obstruction, the patient’s respiratory distress persisted, necessitating endotracheal intubation and close monitoring in the pediatric ICU. To determine the underlying cause, she underwent flexible bronchoscopy and dynamic enhanced CT imaging. Bronchoscopy revealed external tracheal compression along with tracheomalacia. Enhanced CT imaging demonstrated that the 1st branch of the aortic arch gave rise only to the common carotid artery, while the 4th branch coursed posterior to the esophagus before forming the right subclavian artery (Fig. 2), consistent with ARSA.
A, artery; ARSA, aberrant right subclavian artery; Lt, left; Rt, right; V, vein
After a 5-day course of intravenous steroids and inhaled epinephrine, the patient’s respiratory symptoms temporarily stabilized. She was successfully extubated. Given the improvement of her symptoms following the medical therapy, the decision was made to discharge her without undergoing surgical intervention, as the symptoms were deemed to be transient. She was subsequently discharged from the hospital.
Approximately 1 month after discharge, she developed worsening symptoms of poor oral intake and dyspnea. Eventually, she presented to our hospital’s emergency department with respiratory distress triggered by solid food intake.
A CT scan revealed esophageal stenosis, characterized by wall thickening and dilation on the oral side due to compression from ARSA. Additionally, the trachea was compressed by the dilated and thickened esophagus, resulting in tracheal stenosis (Fig. 3). Based on these findings, we concluded that the severe stridor in the present case was due to narrowing of the trachea caused by compression of the trachea by the dilated esophagus. The contents found in the esophagus were consistent with masticated food, rather than a solid state. It was determined that the condition had progressed since the previous episode. Surgical intervention was deemed necessary for definitive resolution of the respiratory condition.
ARSA, aberrant right subclavian artery
A right thoracotomy was performed at the 3rd intercostal space to access the ARSA, which was identified as originating from the descending aorta. The ARSA was observed to pass posterior to the esophagus. ARSA was transected at the point of sufficient length for reconstruction, and its central portion was closed using double 6-0 Prolene sutures (Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ, USA). The aberrant artery was then repositioned anterior to the trachea. The right common carotid artery was temporarily side-clamped while monitoring cerebral oxygen saturation to ensure stability during the procedure. A longitudinal incision was made at the clamped site, and the ARSA was anastomosed to the right common carotid artery in an end-to-side configuration using 7-0 Prolene sutures (Fig. 4).
A, artery; ARSA, aberrant right subclavian artery; E, esophagus; N, nerve; Prolene, Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; SVC, supra vena cava; V, vein; Ver, vertebra
The postoperative course was uneventful. Fluoroscopic evaluation confirmed adequate esophageal clearance, allowing the patient to resume a normal diet.
At the 6-month follow-up, a CT scan was performed to assess the surgical outcome (Fig. 5). The scan showed no stenosis at the reconstructed vessel site and no airway deformity. The patient remained asymptomatic, with no respiratory difficulties or oral intake restrictions in daily life.
ARSA, aberrant right subclavian artery; RCA, right common carotid artery; RSA, right subclavian artery
ARSA was first described by Hunald in 1735, and in 1787, Bayford identified its association with dysphagia, later termed dysphagia lusoria.4) ARSA is the most common congenital anomaly of the aortic arch, with a reported prevalence of 0.2%–1.5% in the general population, according to a systemic review.1) In individuals with ARSA, 4 major vessels arise from the aortic arch, with the aberrant artery originating as the 4th branch from the thoracic aorta, distal to the left subclavian artery. ARSA typically follows an abnormal course, passing posterior to the esophagus in approximately 80% of cases. Less commonly, it traverses between the trachea and the esophagus (13%) or follows a peritracheal route (5%).5)
Most ARSA cases remain asymptomatic, with over half of affected individuals never developing symptoms. The anomaly is often detected incidentally through imaging studies or autopsy.5) However, when symptoms do occur, more than 70% of patients experience dysphagia due to esophageal compression caused by the aberrant artery. Dysphagia is more frequently observed in older patients, as atherosclerosis can exacerbate the compression.2)
By contrast, ARSA cases in children are uncommon and are primarily associated with chronic respiratory symptoms. The higher prevalence of respiratory issues in pediatric patients has been linked to the reduced tracheal rigidity in early childhood compared with adults.3)
A literature review of 25 pediatric ARSA cases was conducted in 2012.6) Upon analysis, it was reported that 14 of the 25 cases presented with respiratory symptoms. Further analysis of the literature indicated that 9 of the 14 cases with respiratory symptoms were attributed to infection. Furthermore, in 6 of those 9 cases, the esophagus was revealed to be dilated or compressed posteriorly. Although not described in detail in the literature, it was assumed that these cases could have caused aspiration due to impaired esophageal transit. To further investigate symptomatic pediatric ARSA cases, a literature review was conducted on studies published after the 2012 review article. A PubMed search identified 18 cases across 13 reports published since 2013.7–19) The findings indicated that dysphagia was the most commonly reported symptom, while respiratory involvement was noted in only 1 case.13)
Conversely, the present case of recurrent severe stridor is uncommon. A review of the literature reveals only 2 documented cases of stridor. In both cases, the esophagus was reported to be dilated. Similar to our case, the dilated esophagus may have compressed the trachea from the posterior, resulting in stridor.
An analysis of reviews of the literature and the symptoms exhibited by the present case revealed that ARSA in children also frequently results in dysphagia due to esophageal compression. In some cases, this condition arises from dysphagia, while in others, it is precipitated by a respiratory infection resulting from aspiration. In rare instances, as evidenced in the present case, it can result in recurrent severe stridor.
Currently, no established guidelines define the precise indications for surgical intervention in ARSA. Although the management of asymptomatic cases remains a topic of debate,20) there is general agreement that symptomatic patients should undergo treatment. Indications for surgical intervention typically encompass dysphagia or respiratory distress, in addition to gastrointestinal bleeding associated with fistulas or aneurysms.21,22) In this case, the patient experienced severe recurrent respiratory distress, making surgical intervention necessary for definitive resolution. The treatment was deemed successful, as the respiratory symptoms ultimately resolved.
While ARSA is a relatively common vascular anomaly, symptomatic cases in pediatric patients are rare and can be life-threatening. Patients with feeding difficulties may subsequently develop respiratory symptoms that can be fatal. Surgical intervention should be considered for patients with feeding difficulties because anatomic structures resulting from abnormal blood vessels do not improve spontaneously.
This research did not receive any specific grants from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Authors’ contributionsArticle writing: WS.
Data collection: KN.
Clinical practice: WS, KN, KO, YI, YO, and HM.
Proofing: WS, KN, KO, YI, YO, and HM.
All authors agree to take responsibility for all aspects of the study.
All authors have read and approved the manuscript.
Availability of data and materialsThe datasets used in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Ethics approval and consent to participateThis work does not require ethical considerations or approval. Informed consent to participate in this study was obtained from the patient.
Consent for publicationWritten consent was obtained from the patient for publication.
Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.