Shikaigaku
Online ISSN : 2189-647X
Print ISSN : 0030-6150
ISSN-L : 0030-6150
10 Effects of premedication on salivary secretion in the rat submandibular gland
Satoko TaniwaKenji UchihashiJunichiro KotaniYasuo Nishikawa
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2009 Volume 72 Issue 1 Pages 43-44

Details
Abstract

During anesthesia, muscarinic parasympathetic antagonists can be used as a preoperative medication on order to reduce salivary flow, tracheobronchial secretions, and pharyngeal secretions, as well as to decrease the acidity of gastric secretions. We did an in vivo study to examine whether muscarinic receptor subtypes play a role in the exocrine function of the rat submandibular gland. The effects of atropine, pirenzepine, methoctramine, 4-diphenylacetoxy-N-dimethylpiperidinium (4-DAMP) and glycopyrrolate were examined on secretion from the submandibular gland evoked by acetylcholine in pentobarbital-anesthetized rats. Glycopyrrolate caused less elevation in heart rate compared with other anticholinergics. Atropine, 4-DAMP and glycopyrrolate markedly inhibited acetylcholine-evoked fluid responses. Pirenzepine showed significantly lower inhibitory potency than atropine, 4-DAMP or glycopyrrolate, while methoctramine had even less of an inhibitory effect. Pirenzepine, 4-DAMP and glycopyrrolate significantly inhibited both protein concentration and amylase activity in the acetylcholine-evoked submandibular saliva, while methoctramine did not affect the responses. The reduction of the protein concentration and amylase activity in submandibular saliva caused by pirenzepine, 4-DAMP and glycopyrrolate were inhibited by N^G-Nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME). Thus, it might be effective to administer anticholinergic drugs together with L-NAME as premedication. These results suggest that glycopyrrolate significantly decreases the salivary secretion, and has significantly fewer side effects than other muscarinic parasympathetic antagonists. Further controlled studies are required to determine the safety, efficacy and patient tolerance of glycopyrrolate.

Content from these authors
© 2009 Osaka Odontological Society
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top