Spine Surgery and Related Research
Online ISSN : 2432-261X
ISSN-L : 2432-261X
Spondylolysis repair using a pedicle screw hook or claw-hook system. -a comparison of bone fusion rates-
Ko IshidaYoichi AotaNaoto MitsugiTakashi KuniyaTakaaki MoriiTakuya KawaiKatsutaka YamadaTomoyuki Saito
Author information

2018 Volume 2 Issue 2 Pages 135-139


Introduction: To assess the bone fusion rates and clinical results of two surgical methods (pedicle screw claw-hook fixation and pedicle screw hook fixation) of lumbar spondylolysis repair.

Methods: A multicenter database of surgical patients with lumbar spondylolysis was reviewed. All patients < 20 years old with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up and computed tomography images were included. Operation time and blood loss amount were investigated. Visual analogue scale (VAS; 0-10) scores for lower back pain were evaluated to assess clinical results.

Results: A total of 17 patients met the inclusion criteria. Pedicle screw hook fixation was performed in five patients (the hook group), and pedicle screw claw-hook fixation was performed in 13 patients (the claw-hook group). One patient was included in both groups because each method was performed at different lumbar levels (L4 and L5). The bone fusion rates at 3, 6, and 9 months after surgery were significantly higher in the claw-hook group than those in the hook group. Operation time and blood loss amount were not significantly different between the groups. VAS scores improved in the claw-hook group but not in the hook group because of a small number of patients.

Conclusions: Pedicle screw claw-hook fixation was more effective than pedicle screw hook fixation in terms of bone fusion rates.

Fullsize Image
Information related to the author
© 2018 The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.

SSRR is an Open Access journal distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Anyone may download, reuse, copy, reprint, or distribute articles published in the journal for not-for-profit purposes if they cite the original authors and source properly. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
Previous article Next article