Spine Surgery and Related Research
Online ISSN : 2432-261X
ISSN-L : 2432-261X
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Comparative Analysis of Characteristics of Lower- and Mid-Cervical Spine Injuries in the Elderly
Naoki SegiHiroaki NakashimaSadayuki ItoJun OuchidaNoriaki YokogawaTakeshi SasagawaTakeo FuruyaAtsushi YundeToru FunayamaFumihiko EtoKota WatanabeSatoshi NoriShota IkegamiMasashi UeharaKo HashimotoYoshito OnodaHideaki NakajimaHidenori SuzukiYasuaki ImajoTomohiro YamadaTomohiko HasegawaKenichi KawaguchiYohei HarutaYoshinori TerashimaRyosuke HirotaHitoshi TonomuraMunehiro SakataYoichi IizukaHiroshi UeiNobuyuki SuzukiKoji AkedaHiroyuki TominagaShoji SekiYasushi OshimaTakashi KaitoBungo OtsukiKazuo NakanishiKenichiro KakutaniHaruki FunaoToshitaka YoshiiDaisuke SakaiTetsuro OhbaMasashi MiyazakiHidetomi TeraiGen InoueSeiji OkadaShiro ImagamaSatoshi Kato
Author information
JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS

2024 Volume 8 Issue 6 Pages 560-567

Details
Abstract

Introduction: Elderly patients have a higher frequency of upper cervical fractures caused by minor trauma; nevertheless, the clinical differences between mid- and lower-cervical (C6-C7) injuries are unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the epidemiology of lower- and mid-cervical injuries in the elderly.

Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study included 451 patients aged 65 years or older who had mid- or lower-cervical fractures/dislocations. Patients' demographic and treatment data were examined and compared based on mid- and lower-cervical injuries.

Results: There were 139 patients (31%) with lower-cervical injuries and 312 (69%) with mid-cervical injuries. High-energy trauma (60% vs. 47%, p=0.025) and dislocation (55% vs. 45%, p=0.054) were significantly experienced more often by elderly patients with lower-cervical injuries than by patients with mid-cervical injuries. Although the incidence of key muscle weakness at the C5 to T1 levels were all significantly lower in patients with lower-cervical injuries than those with mid-cervical injuries, impairments at C5 occurred in 49% of them, and at C6, in 65%. No significant differences were found in the rates of death, pneumonia, or tracheostomy requirements, and no significant differences existed in ambulation or ASIA impairment scale grade for patients after 6 months of treatment.

Conclusions: Elderly patients with lower-cervical fractures/dislocations were injured by high-energy trauma significantly more often than patients with mid-cervical injuries. Furthermore, half of the patients with lower-cervical injuries had mid-cervical level neurological deficits with a relatively high rate of respiratory complications.

Fullsize Image
Content from these authors
© 2024 The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.

SSRR is an Open Access journal distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Anyone may download, reuse, copy, reprint, or distribute articles published in the journal for not-for-profit purposes if they cite the original authors and source properly. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top