1) Physical Laboratory, College of Science, Imperial University of Tokyo
訂正後 :
1) Physical Laboratory, College of Science. Imperial University of Tokyo
訂正日: 2006/03/27訂正理由: -訂正箇所: 引用文献情報訂正内容: Wrong : S. Kusakabe. The Proceesings of the Tokyo Physico-mathematical Society. Vol. II. No. 11. April. 1904. R. Fa. b. Grundzüge zu einer theorie der Edbeben und Vulkanausbrücke. 1869. B. Koto. On the Cause of the Great Earthquake in Central Japan. The Journal of the Coll of Sci. Imp. Univ. of Tokyo. Vol. V. 1891. F. Omori. On the Aftershocks of Earthquakes. The Journal of the Coll. of Sci. Imp. Univ. of Tokyo, Vol. VII. B. Koto. Loc. cited. p. 307. B. Koto. Loc. cited. Georogy and Topography of Mino and Owari. A catalogue of the earthquakes described in these monographs is published in "The Journ. of the Coll. of Scie., Imp. Univ. of Tokyo," Vol. XI. Part 4, 1899. E. Omori. Notes on the E. I. C. Cataogue of Japanese Earthquakes. The above cited Journal. It may be here noted that Professor Omori assumes, in that paper, the continuity of surface intensity, so that the tables given by him are not statistics of real facts but they contain some out-comes of imagination. This fact is noted by the professor himself in his another paper, "the Reports of the E. I. C. Vol. 26," published in Japanese, though he unfortunately neglected to note it in the above cited paper. In the case of No. 137, Table I. e.g., three Provinces i. e. Shimotsuke and Iwashiro. De montessus de Ballore. Relation entre le Relife et la Sismicite Comptes Rendus. CXXX., 1895.
Right : * S. Kusakabe. The Proceedings of the Tokyo Physico-mathematical Scciety. Vol. II. No. 11. April. 1904. * R. Fa b. Grundzüge zu einer theorie der Erdbeben und Vulkanausbrücke. 1869. * B. Koto. On the Cause of the Great Earthquake in Central Japan. The Journal of the Coll of Sci. Imp. Univ. of Tokyo. Vol V. 1891. † F. Omori. On the Aftershocks of Earthquakes. The Journal of the Coll. of Sci. Imp. Univ. of Tokyo, Vol. VII. ‡ B. Koto. Loc. cited. p. 307. * This is simply an analogy, conventionally adopted for sake of illustration. The general rule that an analogy, however perfect, does not explain all the facts connected with it is also true in the case. † B. Koto. Loc. cited. Geology and Topography of Mino and Owari. * A catalogue of the earthpuakes described in these monographs is published in “The Jour. of the Coll. of Scie., Imp. Univ. of Tokyo,” Vol. XI. Part 4, 1899. † E. Omori. Notes on the E. I. C. Catalogue of Japanese Earthquakes. The above cited journal. It may be here noted that Professor Omori assumes, in that paper, the continuity of surface intensity, so that the tables given by him are not statistics of real facts but they contain some out-comes of imagination. This fact is noted by the professor himself in his another paper, “the Reports of the E. I. C. Vol. 26,” published in Japanese, though he unfortunately neglected to note it in the above cited paper. In the case of No. 137, Table I, e.g., three Provinces i.e. Shimotsuke, Iwaki and Iwashiro are given as regions severely shaken, meanwhile we have records only for Shimotsuke and Iwashiro. * The boundary of these two provinces, which were devided in 718 A. D. from the Province of Mutsu, was a little different from that we have it now-a-days. The Cainozoic region arround Shirakawa, which was united to the Province of Iwaki in the early period of Meiji, belonged in those days to the Province of Iwashiro or Iwase as it was called in olden times. * De montessus de Ballore. Relation entre le Relief et la Sismicité. Comptes Rendus. CXX., 1895.