2018 Volume 7 Issue 2 Pages 50-56
It is little known about how and when contradictory institutional logics can be complementary to each other. By quantitatively comparing whether difference practices of Shinkin banks would bring a different degree of complementarity between the communities’ common interest and Shinkin banks’ self-interest. I argue that how contradictory institutional logics were instantiated in practices would influence the complementarity between them. Furthermore, I argue that the complementary effect of different types of instantiation would be influenced by the proportion of different types of instantiations in the total cases of instantiations of the field.
