There is excellent English-language work available on the years leading up to Japan's Meiji Restoration—and specifically how and why a certain domain, Chōshū (modern-day Yamaguchi Prefecture), played such a prominent role in the overthrow of the Tokugawa Shogunate. Still, questions remain. What enabled the radical reformers of Chōshū to come to power, and allowed them to achieve victory over an enormous punitive force dispatched to chastise them? Why did Chōshū succeed when so many other domains stood on the sidelines or, like Mito, fell apart too early to play a revolutionary role? Part one of this article seeks to answer these questions. Part two, however, is devoted to a troubling historiographical issue: a single English-language work, namely Albert Craig’s
Chōshū in the Meiji Restoration (published over fifty years ago), appears to have “won” the debates over Chōshū's exceptionalism. Worse yet, even mild challenge to Craig’s interpretation was met with a blistering rebuke, effectively shutting down debate, or even questions, about Craig’s admittedly quite persuasive position. But should scholarship rely so completely on a single book, to the point of rather harshly criticizing those who might disagree? This article seeks not only to answer these historiographical questions but also to provide a detailed yet accessible account of Chōshū in the years before the Meiji Restoration, intervening in the stalled historiographic debates to suggest a view that synthesizes the strengths of each. This is a critically important task, because understanding the root causes of Chōshū's strength is a vital step towards understanding how the Meiji Restoration unfolded in the way it did—and unlocking the secrets of the Meiji Restoration is fundamental to making sense of all subsequent Japanese history.
View full abstract