Purpose: The brush-on technique was developed to compensate for polymerization shrinkage. In this study, we assess the dimensional accuracy of autopolymerized resin applied using a brush-on technique.
Materials and Methods: Each of five autopolymerized resins, Unifast II (GC), Unifast Trad (GC), Provinice (Shofu), Metafast (Sun Medical), and Miky (Nissin), was applied three times inside a ceramic cylinder (10 mm internal diameter; 5 mm width) using a brush-on technique (horsehair resin brush, Seiundo). As controls, the five resins were applied inside cylinders after the polymer and monomer were mixed at 0.5 mL/g for 10 s. After polymerization, the cylinders were cut into 3-mm wide pieces using a precision cutting machine. The maximum gaps between the ceramics and resins were measured using a scanning electron microscope at a magnification of x500. The dimensional accuracy (n=5) was assessed as the shrinkage percentage (the gaps divided by the internal diameter of the tubes). The data were analyzed by ANOVA/Tukey’s test (α=0.05).
Results: Excluding Metafast, the brush-on technique differed significantly from the controls (p<0.05). Using the brush-on technique, Metafast had the greatest shrinkage, and Unifast had the lowest shrinkage. However, there was no significant difference among all the resins tested (p>0.05).
Conclusion: The dimensional accuracy of the autopolymerized resin using the brush-on technique was better than that of the conventionally mixed polymer and monomer because the polymer and monomer ratio using the brush-on technique was lower and polymerization shrinkage was minimized due to the brush-on technique.
View full abstract