Interventional Radiology
Online ISSN : 2432-0935
Volume 7, Issue 3
Displaying 1-6 of 6 articles from this issue
Original Research
  • Chisami Nagata, Masashi Fujimori, Takashi Yamanaka, Yuichi Sugino, Nar ...
    Article type: Original Research
    2022 Volume 7 Issue 3 Pages 85-92
    Published: November 04, 2022
    Released on J-STAGE: November 04, 2022
    Advance online publication: October 07, 2022
    JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS

    Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the treatment outcomes of thermal ablation for renal metastatic tumors.

    Materials and Methods: Thirteen consecutive patients with small renal metastatic tumors (≤3 cm), who underwent thermal ablation between 2009 and 2020, were included in this study. Eight patients had extra-renal tumors during renal ablation. The primary tumors were adenoid cystic carcinoma in four patients, lung cancer in three, hemangiopericytoma in three, leiomyosarcoma in two, and thyroid cancer in one. The therapeutic effects, safety, survival rate, prognostic factor, and renal function were evaluated.

    Results: We performed 18 ablation sessions (cryoablation, n = 13; radiofrequency ablation, n = 5) on 19 renal metastases with a mean diameter of 1.7 cm, which resulted in a primary technique efficacy rate of 100% without procedure-related deaths or major complications. Renal function significantly declined 6 months after ablation (P = 0.0039). During the mean follow-up period of 31.2 ± 22.4 months (range, 2.7-71.4 months), one patient had local tumor progression at 11.9 months following radiofrequency ablation. The overall survival rates at 1 and 3 years after ablation were 76.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 54.0%-99.8%) and 59.3% (95% CI, 31.3%-87.3%), respectively. Tumor size ≥ 2 cm (P = 0.02) and metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer (P = 0.001) were significant worse prognostic factors in univariate analysis, and metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer (P = 0.01) was significant in multivariate analysis.

    Conclusions: Percutaneous thermal ablation for small renal metastases is safe and feasible and can control local tumors.

    Download PDF (254K)
  • Naoya Kinota, Haruyuki Takaki, Kaoru Kobayashi, Yasukazu Kako, Hiroshi ...
    Article type: Original Research
    2022 Volume 7 Issue 3 Pages 93-99
    Published: November 04, 2022
    Released on J-STAGE: November 04, 2022
    JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS

    Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of radiofrequency (RF) ablation using an ablation system (arfa RF ABLATION SYSTEM®; Japan Lifeline Co. Ltd.) for treating solid tumors in various organs.

    Material and Methods: Between October 2019 and August 2021, 80 patients (29 women, 51 men; median age, 70.0 yr) underwent 107 RF ablation sessions using the ablation system to treat 151 tumors in the liver (n = 86), lung (n = 51), adrenal gland (n = 4), pleura (n = 4), bone (n = 3), lymph node (n = 2), and kidney (n = 1). The maximum tumor diameter was 2-40 mm (median, 11 mm). This study evaluated technical success (defined as the completion of planned RF ablation), technique efficacy (defined as the complete tumor ablation on follow-up images), and adverse events. Local tumor progression in 146 curatively treated malignant tumors was evaluated.

    Results: The technical success rate was 100% (107/107). Ablation zones in two tumors were insufficient. Therefore, the primary technique efficacy rate was 98.1% (105/107). Grade 3 hepatic infarction (1.6%, 1/64) and grade 4 pleuritis (3.4%, 1/29) occurred respectively after liver and lung RF ablation. During the median follow-up period of 10.2 months (Interquartile range, 4.2 and 16.4 months), local tumor progression developed in two tumors (1.4%, 2/146).

    Conclusions: The arfa RF ABLATION SYSTEM® is a feasible, safe, and effective RF ablation device for managing solid tumors in various organs.

    Download PDF (431K)
Case Report
feedback
Top