Ouyou toukeigaku
Online ISSN : 1883-8081
Print ISSN : 0285-0370
ISSN-L : 0285-0370
Volume 37, Issue 2
Displaying 1-2 of 2 articles from this issue
Contributed Paper
  • Takahisa Iida, Takahiro Fukushima, Nobuo Shinozaki
    2008Volume 37Issue 2 Pages 55-76
    Published: 2008
    Released on J-STAGE: January 25, 2012
    JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS
    Consider the detection of abnormality when both continuous and categorical variables are observed. Replacing categorical variables by their dummy variables, the squared Mahalanobis distance is sometimes used. Assuming that continuous variables are conditionally normally distributed when the categorical ones are observed, the exact distribution of the squared Mahalanobis distance is derived. When only one dichotomous variable exists, it is a mixture of two shifted χ² distributions. In the case when k dichotomous variables are involved and their effects are additive on the mean vector of continuous variables, it is a mixture of k shifted χ² distributions.
    Using these results, a detection method based on Mahalanobis distance (modified Mahalanobis distance method) is constructed as a hypothesis testing procedure with exact significant level. For the case when only one dichotomous variable exists, some basic properties are shown on the conditional rejection probabilities in normal condition.
    Further, a comparison is made with the conditional detection method which is based on the conditional distribution of continuous variables when the dichotomous variable is observed. From the numerical evaluation of the power functions of these two methods, the modified Mahalanobis distance method performs better than the conditional detection method for a wide range of parameter values, especially when, for the dichotomous variable, the probability of the case with smaller probability in normal condition increases in abnormal condition.
    Download PDF (911K)
Short Note
  • Chihiro Hirotsu
    2008Volume 37Issue 2 Pages 77-88
    Published: 2008
    Released on J-STAGE: January 25, 2012
    JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS
    The paper by Tanase and Matsuda (2006) is dealing only with the pair-wise comparisons of rows under the title of ‘Multiple Comparison Procedures for Contingency Table and their Evaluation’. However, ‘the Scheffé type method of Hirotsu (1992)’ introduced in Section 4.1 of their paper is actually the old version of the year 1983 and there is also something wrong or inappropriate in the evaluation of the probability approximation method and also the power. In the present note we therefore try to make it precise by giving a new formulation of the Scheffé type method for the row-wise multiple comparisons proposed for analyzing interaction effects in two-way ANOVA model specifically to a contingency table and as well as a new result of the probability approximation. The difference of the two approaches of the Scheffé type method and the method comparing a few limited contrasts is also mentioned.
    Download PDF (714K)
feedback
Top